바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.34 No.1

Citation Share

대명사의 성별단서에 담긴 사회인지적 표상

Social-Cognitive Representations for Pronoun’s Gender Cue

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2015, v.34 no.1, pp.87-107
이재호 (계명대학교)
이재호. (2015). 대명사의 성별단서에 담긴 사회인지적 표상. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 34(1), 87-107.

초록

삼인칭 대명사의 성별단서가 참가자의 성과 정서적 평가와 상호작용하는 과정을 밝히기 위해서 두 개의 실험이 실시되었다. 실험 1은 SOA 150ms에서 대명사를 점화하여 정서 단어의 명명반응을 참가자 성에 따라 측정하였다. ‘그’ 점화가 ‘그녀’ 점화에 비해서 명명시간이 빨랐으며, 두 대명사와 정서 단어의 이원상호작용이 관찰되었다. 남녀 모두 성별단서 ‘그’ 점화는 긍정과 부정의 차이를 보였지만 ‘그녀’ 점화는 차이가 없었다. 실험 2는 세 변인의 효과를 SOA 1000ms에서 관찰하였다. 참가자 성, 대명사 성별, 및 정서단어의 삼원상호작용 경향성이 관찰되었다. 참가자 여자가 ‘그녀’ 점화에서 긍정과 부정 단어의 차이를 보였다. 두 실험에서 대명사 ‘그’는 정서적 평가의 긍정적 촉진 효과가 관찰되었고, ‘그녀’는 여자 참가자에서 부정적 억제 효과가 관찰되었다. 대명사의 성별단서는 참가자 성과 정서적 평가에서 역동적인 상호작용이 있음을 확인하였다.

keywords
참가자 성, 삼인칭 대명사, 점화효과, 시간경과, 사회 인지, 정서적 평가, 명명과제, participant’s sex, personal gender pronoun, priming effect, social cognition, emotional evaluation

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to explore the interaction of participant’s sex (male and female), personal gender pronoun (e.g. ‘he’ and ‘she’) and emotional evaluation (e.g. positive and negative). Using time-course approach (e.g. SOA 150-1000ms) and primed naming task), in Experiment 1, Participants were presented personal pronoun as primes at SOA 150ms and were asked to respond emotional words which were different in emotional attributes. The results showed that the main effects of personal pronoun were observed and the main effects of emotional words were observed marginally and the interaction effects of personal pronoun and emotional words were also observed. In Experiment 2, Participants were presented personal pronoun as primes at SOA 1000ms and were asked to response emotional words which were differed in emotional attributes. The results showed that the main effects of personal pronoun and emotional words were observed marginally, and the three way interaction effects of participant’s sex, personal gender pronoun and emotional words were observed marginally. Two experiments suggested that male pronoun ‘he’ has positive facilitation effect for emotional evaluation at short SOA, whereas female pronoun ‘she’ has negative inhibition effects at long SOA only for female participants. These results were discussed from a point of view of dynamic processes of social cognition for gender.

keywords
참가자 성, 삼인칭 대명사, 점화효과, 시간경과, 사회 인지, 정서적 평가, 명명과제, participant’s sex, personal gender pronoun, priming effect, social cognition, emotional evaluation

참고문헌

1.

김한샘 (2005). 현대 국어 사용 빈도 조사 2. 서울: 국립국어원.

2.

이재호 (2006). 성별 고정관념의 암묵적 표상과 자동적 점화. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 11, 41-61.

3.

이재호 (2012a). 대명사 ‘나’와 ‘너’의 사회 인지적 표상 차이. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31, 261-278.

4.

이재호 (2012b). 인칭 대명사 ‘나’와 ‘너’의 평가적 표상 차이. 인지과학, 23, 323-348.

5.

이재호, 김성일 (1998). 언어 이해과정의 연구 방법. 이정모, 이재호 (편), 인지심리학의 제 문제 II: 언어와 인지 (155-182쪽). 서울: 학지사.

6.

이재호, 방희정 (2003). 성별 고정관념의 암묵적 표상: 성별의 속성 전형성과 집단 일치성의 점화효과. 인지과학, 14, 37-48.

7.

이재호, 이정모 (2000). 개념 지식의 유형에 따른 표상 차이: 범주와 각본의 위계성과 전형성 비교. 인지과학, 11, 73-81.

8.

이정모, 이재호 (2004). 담화글의 이해과정: 대명사 참조해결의 성별 표지와 초점 효과. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 16, 151-168.

9.

Aidman, V. A., & Carroll, S. M. (2003). Implicit individual differences: Relationships between implicit self-esteem, gender identity, gender attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 17, 19-37.

10.

Banaji, M., & Hardin, C. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136-141.

11.

Baranowski, M. (2002). Current usage of the epicene pronoun in written English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 378-392.

12.

Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912.

13.

Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditionally automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 104-128.

14.

Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142-1163.

15.

Blanton, H., & Stapel, D. A. (2008). Unconscious and spontaneous and ... complex: The three selves model of social comparison assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1018-1032.

16.

Cacciari, C., & Padovani, R. (2007). Further evidence on gender stereotype priming in language: semantic facilitation and inhibition on Italian role nouns. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 277-293

17.

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. E. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-426.

18.

Cvencek, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2012). Balanced identity theory: Evidence for implicit consistency in social cognition. In Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A unifying concept in social psychology (pp.157-177). New York: Guilford Press.

19.

De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., & Spruyt, A. (2001). Affective priming of pronunciation reponses: Effects of target degradation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 85-91.

20.

Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.

21.

Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.

22.

Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu. D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50. 229-238.

23.

Glaser, J., & Banaji, M.. R. (1999). When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse Priming in automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 669-687.

24.

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitude, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.

25.

Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). An unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3-25.

26.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.

27.

Housley, M. K., Claypool, H. M., Garcia-Marques, T., & Mackie, D. M. (2010). “We” are familiar but “It” is not: Ingroup pronouns trigger feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 114-119.

28.

Klauer, K. C., Rossnagel, C., & Musch, J. (1997). List-context effects in evaluative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 246-255.

29.

Kunda, Z. (2000). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

30.

Lee, J-M., & Lee, J-H. (2005). Contrast information processing in discourse comprehension. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 16, 69-92.

31.

Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology. 51, 93- 120.

32.

Martindale, C., & Moore, K. (1988). Priming, prototypicality, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 661-670.

33.

MacLeod, C. M. (2007). The concept of inhibition in cognition. In D. S. Gorfein and C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 3-23). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

34.

Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B., & Solomon, K. O. (2000). Are there kinds of concepts? Annual Review of Psychology. 51, 121-147.

35.

Musch, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). The psychology of evaluation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

36.

Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.

37.

Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp.264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

38.

Perdue, C. W., Dovidio, J. F., Gurtman, M. B., & Tyler, R. B. (1990). Us and them: Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 475-486.

39.

Rudman, L. Greenwald, A., & McGhee, D. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164-1178.

40.

Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1270-1281.

41.

Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2004). Non-associative semantic priming: Episodic affective priming of naming responses. Acta Psychologica, 116, 39-54.

42.

Stapel, D. A., & Koomen, W. (1998). When stereotype activation results in (counter) stereotypical judgments: Priming stereotype- relevant traits and exemplars. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 136-163.

43.

Stapel, D. A., & Winkielman, P. (1998). Assimilation and contrast as a function of context-target similarity, distinctness, and dimensional relevance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 634-646.

44.

Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책