open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0696
본 연구는 심리적 임파워먼트가 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 있어서의 자율적 동기화(자기결정감)의 매개효과를 검증하고자 하였고, 객관적인 수행자료에 근거하여 고수행자와 저수행자를 구분하여 두 집단간 심리적 임파워먼트 및 자율적 동기화 수준에서의 차이를 밝히고자 하였다. 조사 대상자는 국내 K 생명회사의 212명의 재직자들이었으며, 인사고과 자료에 근거하여 상하위 20%의 종업원을 선별하여 설문조사를 실시하였다. 수집한 자료를 분석한 결과, 고수행자집단이 저수행자집단보다 심리적 임파워먼트의 3요소(유능성, 결정성, 의미성), 자율적 동기화, 및 조직몰입 모두에서 유의하게 더 높은 수준을 보였다. 또한 심리적 임파워먼트의 3요소 각각이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 있어 자율적 동기화의 매개효과를 분석한 결과, 부분매개효과를 보인 의미성을 제외하고는 모두 자율적 동기화의 완전매개효과가 나타났다. 고수행자집단과 저수행자집단간에 매개효과의 차이가 있는 지를 추가적으로 살펴보았는 데, 의미성에서 두 집단간에 차이가 있었다. 마지막으로 분석결과의 의미를 자기결정감이론의 맥락에서 논의하였다.
The purpose of this study was to examine the mediating effects of autonomous motivation on the relationship between psychological empowerment(meaning, competence, autonomy) and organizational commitment. And also this study was aimed to discover the difference between high performance group and low performance group on the level of perceived psychological empowerment and autonomous motivation. The results of analysis of the survey data collected from 214 employees at a Korean insurance company showed that there were significant differences between high and performance groups on the three psychological empowerment elements. Further, the result showed that the mediating effects of autonomous motivation were also significant on the all the three empowerment elements. Finally, the theoretical and practical implications of this research were discussed based on the self-determination theory, and the limitation of his study and several directions for future research were also suggested.
이재훈 (1998). 조직공정성과 임파워먼트가 조직몰입에 미치는 영향. 경영연구, 13(1), 253-272.
장재윤(1997). 상사와의 학력일치가 R & D 전문가의 조직 및 전문분야몰입에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 10(2), 79-103.
장재윤, 구자숙 (1998). 보상이 내재적 동기 및 창의성에 미치는 효과: 개관과 적용. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 12(2). 39-77.
황운용, 정진철 (2005). 심리적 임파워먼트가 직무만족에 미치는 영향력에 대한 직무몰입의 조절역할: 호텔서비스 종업원을 중심으로. 산업경제연구, 18(4), 1541- 1564.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Colorado: Westview Press.
Barron, R. M, & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Bhatnagar, J. (2005). The power of psychological empowerment as an antecedents to organizational commitment in Indian managers. Human Resource Development International, 8, 419-433.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-482.
Deci. E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. NY: Plenum Press.
Eby, L. T., Freeman, D. M., Rush, M. C., & Lance, C. E. (1999). Motivational bases of affective commitment: A partial test of an integrative theoretical model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 463-483.
Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Guay, F. (1995). Academic motivation and school performance: toward a structural model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 257- 274.
Gagne, M., & Deci. E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.
Gagne, M., Senecal, C., & Koestner, R. (1997). Proximal job characteristics, feelings of empowerment, and intrinsic motivation: A multidimensional model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1222-1240.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: an experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890-898.
Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of the situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24, 175-213.
Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Kirman, B. L. & Rosen, B. (1997). A model of work team empowerment. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (pp. 131-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Kohn, A. (1993). Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 54-63.
Lawler, E. E. (1992). The ultimate advantage: Creating the high involvement organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 407-416.
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 991-117.
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages. NY: Academic Press.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V.(1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technician, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.
Robbins, T. L., Crino, M. D., & Fredendall, L. D. (2002). An integrative model of the empowerment process. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 419-444.
Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the interpersonal sphere: an extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., & Reis, H. R. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270 1279.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 483-504.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46-56.
Thomas, K. W. (2002). 열정과 몰입의 방법 (장재윤, 구자숙 역). 서울: 지식공작소. (원전은 2000년에 출판).
Thomas, K. W., & Tymon, W. G. (1993). Empowerment inventory. Tuxedo, NY: Xicom.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161-1176.
Williams, L. Z., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover model: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 219-232.
