ISSN : 1229-4632
농민문학, 프로문학뿐만 아니라 민족문학의 범주로서도 자리매김하고 있는 이기영은 사회주의 여성해방론을 지녔음에도 불구하고 가부장제 유교 이념의 봉건가정에서 성장하여 작품 속에 혼효되는 양상을 보이고 있다. 첫 번째 남성중심적 시각으로 묘사된 여성상에서는 11살의 모친 사별과 14살의 조혼경험의 결정적 인상에 기인하는 투사적 계급형 인물이 이상화되거나 관념적으로 묘사되고 있어 작가가 고통받는 여성의 현실을 제대로 이해하지 못하고 이데올로기만 주입하고 있음을 알 수 있다. 또한 아내들은 구여성이든 신여성이든 이기적이고 위선적인 속물주의자, 처세주의자, 성욕 물질욕이 강한 현실주의자로 관찰되며 여성의 용모는 아름답고 신비화된 성적 대상으로 그려진다. 각성의 계기로 본 남녀 성차에서는 여성의 주체획득 과정이 남성과 차이를 보이고 있음을 주시한 부분이다. 문제적 개인이 남성인 경우 자발적인 향상심이나 내적 고뇌가 계기가 되지만 여성들은 대부분 남성과의 실연 이후에 나타나며 의식화 과정에서도 남성 지식인이 개입되어 있고 남성이 귀농, 귀향 후의 활약이 돋보이는 비해 여성들은 고향으로 가지 않고 있어 공사이분법의 경계를 탈피하지 못하고 정절 이데올로기를 극복하지 못하고 있다. 마지막으로 젠더, 민족, 계급의 삼중 억압 속에 식민지 한국여성들의 열악한 위치가 매매혼, 심청 모티프에서 단적으로 드러난다. 그럼에도 불구하고 이기영의 ‘여성해방’ 소설에서 꾸준히 천착해온 여성문제는 유의미하며 이러한 난제들이 현재 남성작가에게서도 여전히 재현되고 있다는 점에서 오늘날의 문제로 남아있다.
This article has analyzed literature of Giyeong I, one of the renowned writers in the colonial period in view of feminism. The writer who had literary view of Marxism and women's liberation revealed confused aspects due to his growth in a feudalistic family of patriarchal confucianism. First, seeing the idealized aspect of woman described in male oriented view, it is as a result of early separation by death of his mother and heart broken experience from early marriage in his childhood. The classified characters described such as warrior and fighter is the result that the writer has just infused ideology without proper understanding on the reality of women in agony. Also, all the wives in his works described as selfish or hypocritical and completely materialistic person, opportunist, and realist with strong sexual and material desire while the women in his novels are referred to as beautiful and mystified sexual objects. In the sexual difference of man and woman with the view of awakening, it is noticeable part that there is difference in the process of recovering subjectivity for a woman from that for a man. A woman became to undergo the world of man in order to achieve self-awakening and if a man's personal process of problem is to say as a result of aspiration for self-improvement or internal suffering, most of women appeared to have self-awakening after suffering from broken heart with a man and even a man intellectual is related in the process of self-consciousness. Also the hero became to run away from home to be an individual of trouble and return home and to the farm after a few years. Then he solve difficulties in his hometown. But on the other hand, most of heroines do not return to their home and break from the border of the dichotomy of public and private. Such factors indicate that still woman is the object dependent and to be trained and enlightened by man and it is because the writer sticks the man initiative view not getting out of fidelity ideology. Finally, the inferior position of Korean women in colonial period is frankly revealed in the motive of purchase marriage and Simcheong under the triple suppression of gender, people and class. It displays the reality that woman does not establish identity of herself due to failure to acquire decision making authority on sexuality, be under control by the head of family such as father or husband and shared as property of man. Though the writer had the literary view of Marxism and women's liberation with the attitude of anti-feudalism and anti-imperialism under the rule of Japanese imperialism, he left contradictory world of his works with the limit of Marxist feminism focused on liberation of the class without awareness on characteristics of gender. Because his growth process under the feudalistic patriarchal family contended tightly with his literary view and his works. However, the issue on woman continuously pursued in his literature has considerable meaning and it is left as the matter of today in the fact that his weak point still reappears in the works of male writers today.