바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

ISSN : 1225-6706

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.21 No.1

Citation Share

New Urban Development Paradigm and Construction of Development Strategies for Sharing Growth Benefits

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2011, v.21 no.1, pp.107-152

(2011). New Urban Development Paradigm and Construction of Development Strategies for Sharing Growth Benefits. Space and Environment, 21(1), 107-152.

Abstract

Recently modernist urban development models have been criticized in terms of failing the sustainability of nature and human, human-nature relation, human-human relation. This paper critically investigates the limits of modernist urban development models and analysis the features of new urban paradigms including mega-region and MetroNation, global city, network city, creative city, ubiquitous city,eco-city and town, healthy city, slow city, smart growth, new urbanism and urban village, compact city, Japanese new urban village, local agenda 21. Finally complementary conceptual frameworks or pathways need to enlarge alternatives of new urban paradigms based on reestablishment of spatial efficiency concept, use and excavation of urban specific assets, new concept of growth engine and market, conversion of modernist planning and guarantee of democratic assets in the urban political process, endogenous development strategy for sharing growth benefits.

keywords
도시발전 패러다임, 도시계획, 근대도시발전 모델, 내포적 발전, urban development paradigm, urban planning, modernist urban planning, endogenous development

Reference

1.

국제도시개발협회 편(대한주택공사 역). 1994. 신도시전망(I): 전원도시에서 도시재개발까지 . 대한주택공사.

2.

김용창. 1998. ｢지구적 공간통합과 네트워크 도시｣. 현대도시이론의 전환 (한국공간환경학회 엮음), 한울, 59～95.

3.

김용창. 2010. ｢개발패러다임의 변화와 LH의 역할｣. 녹색의 나라, 보금자리의 꿈 , 토지주택연구원편저, 629～655.

4.

김정훈‧강현수 외. 2005. ｢유비쿼터스와 도시계획｣. ≪도시정보≫ 277호(2005년 4월호), 대한국토도시계획학회.

5.

김천권. 2002. ｢압축도시(Compact City): 지속 가능한 도시개발을 위한 대안인가｣. ≪토지연구≫ 제13권 제3호(통권 제64호), 한국토지주택공사, 95～107.

6.

김현식‧김은정. 2009. ｢오바마 신행정부의 새로운 국토비전: 대도시권국가 (MetroNation)론｣. ≪국토정책 Brief≫ 제22호(2009.5.11), 국토연구원.

7.

김흥순. 2006. ｢뉴어바니즘 근대적 접근인가 탈근대적 접근인가｣. ≪도시행정학보≫ 제9집, 한국도시행정학회, 47～72.

8.

류우익. 1983. ｢한국 지리학에 있어 지역정책의 쟁점｣. ≪지리학논총≫ 제10호, 87～106.

9.

마쓰나가 야스미쓰 지음(진영환‧김진범‧정윤희 옮김). 2009. 도시계획의 신조류 . 한울아카데미.

10.

손정원. 2009. ｢영국의 에코타운 계획｣. ≪토지연구≫ 제29권(통권 제87호), 한국토지주택공사, 119～135.

11.

이기석. 1983. ｢80년대 국가발전을 위한 과제: 도시개발 분야｣. ≪현대사회≫ 여름호, 201～211.

12.

이상헌. 1998. ｢생태도시의 이론적 구성｣. 현대 도시이론의 전환 , 한울.

13.

이주일‧김인희. 2009. 국토 및 도시계획체계의 재정립을 위한 국제비교 연구 . 서울시정개발연구원.

14.

이희연. 2008. ｢창조도시: 개념과 전략｣. ≪국토≫ 통권 322호(8월호), 국토연구원, 6～15.

15.

임희지. 2001. ｢지속가능한 도시조성을 위한 신전통주의 계획이론 분석 연구: 우리나라 도시개발 기법의 실태와 개선방향을 중심으로｣. ≪국토연구≫ 제32권, 95～111.

16.

장세룡. 2009. ｢헤테로토피아: (탈)근대적 공간 이해를 위한 시론｣. ≪대구사학≫ 제95집, 대구사학회, 285～317.

17.

정 석‧조준범‧김남선. 1999. 주민 참여형 마을 단위 도시계획을 위한 기본 방향설정: 주민참여형 마을 만들기 사례연구 . 서울시정개발연구원.

18.

조영태. 2008. ｢도시계획 패러다임 변화와 발전방향｣. 수도권 광역경제권 포럼 발표자료.

19.

최대식‧강명수. 2006. ｢여유로운 삶의 구현: 슬로시티｣. ≪국토도시브리프≫ 제3호, 한국토지공사 국토도시연구원.

20.

최병두‧홍인옥‧강현수‧안영진. 2004. ｢지속가능한 발전과 새로운 도시화: 개념적 고찰｣. ≪대한지리학회지≫ 제39권 제1호, 70～87.

21.

하원규‧김동환‧최남희. 2002. 유비쿼터스 IT혁명과 제3공간 . 전자신문사.

22.

한국보건산업진흥원. 2005. 건강도시 건설 및 운영을 위한 계획지침의 개발 . 보건복지부.

23.

허우긍‧김용창 외. 2010. 21세기 국토공간 관리방안 연구 . 토지주택연구원.

24.

Antrop, M. 2004. “Landscape Change and the Urbanization Process in Europe.” Landscape and Urban Planning 67, 9～26.

25.

Arbury, J. 2005. From Urban Sprawl to Compact City: an Analysis of Urban Growth Management in Auckland, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Auckland.

26.

Arigoni, D., et.al. 2001. Affordable Housing and Smart Growth; Making the Network. National Neighborhood Coalition(Smart Growth Network).

27.

Batten, D, F. 1995. “Network Cities: Creative Urban Agglomerations for the 21st Century.” Urban Studies, 32(2), 313～327.

28.

Berube, A. 2007. MetroNation: How U.S. Metropolitan Areas Fuel American Prosperity. Brookings Institution.

29.

Burkhalter, L. and Castells, M. 2009. “Beyond the Crisis: Towards a New Urban Paradigm”, in Lei Qu. et. al(eds.), The New Urban Question: Urbanism Beyond Neo-Liberalism, International Forum on Urbanism, 21～43.

30.

CAT(Centre for Alternative Technology). 2010. Zero Carbon Britain 2030; A New Energy Strategy. The second report of the Zero Carbon Britain project.

31.

Congress for the New Urbanism. 1999. Charter of the New Urbanism, McGraw Hill(안건혁‧온영태 옮김. 2003. 뉴어바니즘 헌장 . 한울아카데미).

32.

Costa, et. al. 2007. “A Discussion on the Governance of ‘Creative Cities’: Some Insights for Policy Action.” Norwegian Journal of Geography, Vol.61, 122～132.

33.

Dirks, S. and Keeling, M. 2009. A Vision of Smarter Cities. IBM Institute for Business Value.

34.

Duhl, L. J. and Sanchez, A. K. 1999. Healthy Cities and the City Planning Process. WHO Regional Office for Europe.

35.

EPA, et. al. 2006. This is Smart Growth(이왕건‧구홍미 역. 2010. 스마트 성장 개론 . 국토연구원).

36.

Evans, G., et. al. 2006. Strategies for Creative Spaces and Cities: Lessons Learned. London Development Agency.

37.

Florida, R. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class, Routledge(이원호‧이종호‧서민철. 2008. 도시와 창조계급 . 푸른길).

38.

Florida, R., Gulden, T. and Mellander, C. 2008. “The Rise of the Mega-region.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(3), 459～476.

39.

Friedmann, J. 2005. “Globalization and the Emerging Culture of Planning.” Progress in Planning 64, 183～234.

40.

Grant, J. L. 2009. “Theory and Practice in Planning the Suburbs: Challenges to Implementing New Urbanism, Smart Growth, and Sustainability Principles.” Planning Theory & Practice, Vol.10(1), 11～33.

41.

Harvey, D. 2000. Spaces of Hope. University of California Press(최병두‧이상률‧박규택 역. 2001. 희망의 공간 . 한울).

42.

Humber, W. “Towards a New Urban Paradigm.” http://www.senecac.on.ca/ revitalization (access 2010).

43.

Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and life of Great American Cities. Random House(유강은 옮김. 2010. 미국 대도시의 죽음과 삶 . 그린비).

44.

K’Akumu, O. A. 2007. “Sustain No City: An Ecological Conceptualization of Urban Development.” CITY, 11(2), 221～228.

45.

Klaassen, L. H. and Paelinck, J. H. P. 1979. “The Future of Large Towns.” Environment and Planning A, Vol.11(10), 1095～1104.

46.

Lefebvre, H. 1996. Writings on Cities, translated and edited by E. Kofman and E. Lebas, Wiley-Blackwell.

47.

Litman. 2010. “Where We Want To Be: Home Location Preferences And Their Implications For Smart Growth.” Presented at The Congress for New Urbanism Transportation Summit, Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

48.

Living Cities. 2009. Green Cities: How Urban Sustainability Efforts Can and Must Drive America’s Climate Change Policies(이왕건 외 역. 2010. 그린 시티 . 국토연구원).

49.

Lombardo, T. 2006. “Future Studies.” in Contemporary Futurist Thought: Science Fiction, Future Studies, and Theories and Visions of the Future in the Last Century. AuthorHouse

50.

Meagher, S. M. 2007. “Philosophy in the Streets Walking the City with Engels and de Certeau.” CITY, 11(1), 7～20.

51.

Moulaert, F. and Djellal, F. 1995. “Information Technology Consultancy Firms: Economies of Agglomeration from a Wide-area Perspective.” Urban Studies, 32(1), 105～122.

52.

Priemus, H. 2010. “Decision-making on Mega-projects: Drifting on Political Discontinuity and Market Dynamics.” EJTIR, 10(1), 19～29.

53.

PRP Architects Ltd, URBED and Design for Homes. 2008. Beyond Eco-towns: Applying the Lessons from Europe: Report and Conclusions.

54.

PwC. 2006. Cities of the Future: Global Competition, Local Leadership.

55.

Saab, J. A. 2007. “Historical Amnesia: New Urbanism and the City of Tomorrow.” Journal of Planning History, Vol.6(3), 191～213.

56.

Salet, W. G. M. and Gualini, E. 2005. “Framing Multiple Purposed Urban Projects.” COMET Deliverable WP 9.

57.

Sarzynski, A. and Levy, A. 2010. “Spatial Efficiency and Regional Prosperity: A Literature Review and Policy Discussion.” Working Paper #41, George Washington Institute of Public Policy.

58.

Storper, M. and Scott, A. J. 2009. “Rethinking Human Capital, Creativity and Urban Growth.” Journal of Economic Geography 9, 147～167.

59.

Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., Rodriguez, A. 2002. “Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe:Large-Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy.” Antipode, Vol.34(3), 542～577.

60.

Taylor, P. J., Walker, D. R. F. and Beaverstock, J. V. 2002. “Firms and Their Global Service Networks.” in S. Sassen(ed.), Global Networks, Linked Cities, Routledge, 93～116.

61.

ULI(Urban Land Institute). 2003. Smart Growth: Myth and Fact.

62.

UN. 1993. Agenda 21: Earth Summit-The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio.

63.

UN-HABITAT. 2009. Planning Sustainable Cities: Global Report on Human Settlements 2009.

64.

Weissbourd, R. and Muro, M. 2011. Metropolitan Business Plans: A New Approach to Economic Growth. Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program.

Space and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy