- P-ISSN1225-6706
- E-ISSN2733-4295
- KCI
과학기술 시티즌십에 기반을 둔 참여형 환경정책 모형 설계
Designing a Participatory Model of Environmental Policy Based on Scientific Technological Citizenship
Abstract
이 논문은 ‘과학기술 시티즌십’ 개념에 근거하여 시민참여형 환경정책 모형을정립하고 이에 따라 스웨덴과 덴마크의 사례를 분석한 것이다. 참여 민주주의의연장으로 과학기술 시티즌십을 정착시켜온 스웨덴과 덴마크 사례는 우리나라 환경정책에도 시사점을 제공한다. 스웨덴과 덴마크 사례에서 주요 정책 참여자인 정책기구, 과학기술전문단체, 이해관계자와 일반시민 모두 과학기술 사안에 적극 관여하며 상호작용을 행하고 있다. 공공참여 방식은 전문가들의 다양한 이견까지 공개함으로써 정보제공과 이해확보를 꾀할 뿐만 아니라 참여자 간의 의사소통과 인식공유, 자문, 실행 참여에 이르기까지 중첩적으로 나타났다. 시민참여의 제도화 전략으로는 입법전략, 행정전략, 주민 간의 자발적 네트워크가 활용되었다. 과학기술 시티즌십은 정책과정 전반에 걸쳐 적용되고 있는데 특히 정책결정단계에서 가장 활발히 적용되고 있었다. 우리나라 환경정책에 과학기술 시티즌십을 정착시키기 위해서는, 4대강살리기사업 사례에서 나타난 것과 같이, 정책의 공개성과 투명성, 시민참여 시행을 위한정부의 의지가 중요하며 전문가단체의 개방된 인식과 태도가 필요하다. 과학기술시티즌십은 우리나라 과학기술계의 전문가적 독립성을 유지하는 데도 중요하며,정책을 둘러싼 정치적 논쟁을 합리적이고 과학적인 논의로 전환하여 정책 신뢰도를 높이는 데도 기여할 것이다.
- keywords
- 과학기술 시티즌십, 환경정책, 시민참여, 스웨덴, 덴마크, 4대강살리기사업, scientific technological citizenship, environmental policy, participation, Sweden, Denmark, Four Major Rivers Restoration
참고문헌
김건호. 2010. ｢권두언: 4대강 살리기 사업과 국격 향상｣. ≪물과 미래≫, 43(2), 6~10쪽.
김두환. 2000a. ｢사회적 학습과정으로서 협력적 계획모델의 적용: 합의회의를 사례로｣. 서울대학교 환경대학원 석사학위논문.
김두환. 2000b. ｢제2차 생명복제기술 합의회의: 평가 그리고 전망｣. 합의회의 국내도입을 위한 워크숍 발표논문집. 63~78쪽.
김명진. 2006. ｢합의회의에 대한 평가와 전망｣. ≪과학과 기술≫, 9월호.
김명진·이영희. 2002. 과학기술, 환경, 시민참여 . 서울: 한울.
김철규·이지웅. 2009. ｢4대강 사업과 팔당 유기농 공동체｣. ≪ECO≫, 13(2), 43~67쪽.
김환석. 1999. ｢시민참여를 실험하다: ‘유전자조작식품 합의회의’ 체험기｣. 참여연대과학기술민주화를위한모임 편. 진보의 패러독스 , 289~321쪽. 서울: 당대.
대니얼 리 클라인맨(엮음). 2013. 과학 기술 민주주의 . 김명진 외 옮김. 서울: 갈무리.
박창근. 2009. ｢녹색성장 정책과 4대강 살리기 사업의 문제｣. ≪경제와 사회≫, 83, 117~142쪽.
신필균. 2011. 복지국가 스웨덴 . 서울: 후마니타스.
심명필. 2009. ｢권두언: 4대강 살리기 사업의 순항을 바라며｣. ≪물과 미래≫, 42(1), 6~8쪽.
오정일. 2012. ｢비용편익분석의 유용성에 관한 이론적 검토｣. ≪정책분석평가학회보≫, 22(1), 33~57쪽.
이상헌. 2010. ｢통합적 수자원 관리원칙에 의한 4대강 사업의 정당성 검토｣. ≪EC O≫, 14(1), 63~96쪽.
이순자. 2010. ｢수질환경보전을 위한 4대강 사업과 현행 제도의 검토｣. ≪환경법과정책≫, 제4권, 51~108쪽.
이영희. 2011. 과학기술과 민주주의 . 서울: 문학과지성사.
최희경. 2013. 스웨덴의 환경책임 실천모형: 지역 거버넌스 사례 . 서울: 집문당.
키이스 포크. 2009. 시티즌십: 시민정치론 강의 . 이병천 옮김. 서울: 아르케.
4대강 새물결 홈페이지. www.riverguide.go.kr.
≪가톨릭신문≫. 2012. “키워드로 보는 두물머리 유기농지의 기록”. 8.23.
≪경향신문≫. 2012. “‘MB 임기 내 완성’ 압박이 4대강 담합 불러”. 10.23.
≪시사IN≫. 2010. “4대강 양심선언 김이태 연구원, 2년 만에 ‘왕따’”. 9.25.
≪연합뉴스≫. 2012a. “‘4대강 비판교수’ 고소에 반발 잇따라”. 7.10.
≪연합뉴스≫. 2012b. 박근혜 “과학기술을 국정운영 중심에 둘 것”. 10.4.
≪프레시안≫. 2012. “수질오염 누명 쓴 팔당 유기농의 진실”. 8.8.
≪한겨레≫. 2009. “토론 막는 ‘4대강 공청회’”. 5.25.
≪한겨레≫. 2012. “4대강 공사업체, 비용 부풀려 40억 비자금 조성”. 5.23.
≪한국과총Webzine≫. 2009. “4대강 사업, 토목학회 제안으로 시작: 대한토목학회 편종근 회장 인터뷰”. 4.20.
≪MBN≫. 2012. “낙동강 비리 … 공무원·건설사 임직원 적발”. 5.24.
≪MK뉴스≫. 2009. “영국서 혈장 수혈 후 인간광우병 감염 첫 발견”. 2.15.
<PD수첩>. 2009. “착공 한 달 전, 기로에 선 4대강”. 828회. 9.8.
<PD수첩>. 2010. “4대강 수심 6m의 비밀”. 828회. 869회. 8.24.
Andersen, Ida-Elisabeth and Jaeger, Birgit. 2002. “Danish Participatory Models, Scenario Workshops and Consensus Conferences: towards more democratic decision-making.” Pantaneto, Issue 6, April.
Bergstrom, E. 2011. “City Center on the Water.” Europe in the World. (www.schoolvoor journalistiek.com/europe/).
Bjällås, Ulf. 2010. “Experiences of Sweden’s Environmental Courts.” Journal of Court Innovation, 3(1), pp. 177~184.
Blok, A. 2007. “Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference.” Public Understanding of Science, 16, PP. 163~182.
Bonney, D. et al. 2009. Public Participation in Scientific Research: A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Washington, DC: CAISE(Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education).
British Council. 2010. Science and Citizenship: Ten years on from the House of Lords report. London: British Council.
Calabrese Barton, A. M. 2012. “Citizen(s’) Science,” Democracy & Education, 20(2), Article 12.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P and Barthe, Y. 2009. Acting in and Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Cameron, David. 2012. “Cameron’s ‘Moral Capitalism’ Speech.” Politics.co.uk, 19 January.
Commission of the European Communities. 2002. Communication from the Commission on the Collection and Use of Expertise by the Commission: Principles and Guidelines. Com(2002) 713 Final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Community Research and Development Information Service. (Homepage: http://cordis. europa.eu.).
Cooper, C. B. 2012. “Links and Distinctions Among Citizenship, Science, and Citizen Science.” Democracy & Education, 20(2), Article 13.
Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T. and Bonney, R. 2007. “Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems.” Ecology and Society, 12(2), Article 1. Danish Board of Technology. (www.tekno.dk).
Energy Development Island Nations. “Samso̸, Denmark, Strives to Become a Carbon- Neutral Island.” (www.edinenergy.org).
EURHONET(European Housing Network). 2010. Successful Examples: City planning for social integration in the Eurhonet companies. Eurhonet.
Featherstone, H., Wilkinson, C and Bultitude, K. 2009. Public Engagement Map: Report to the Science for All Expert Group. Bristol: University of the West of England.
Forssander, Y. et al. 2011. Manifesto of RiverCity Pop-up. Centrala Älvstaden. (www.central aalvstaden.nu).
Glynn et al. 2003. Typifying Scientific Advisory Structures and Scientific Advice Production Methodologies: Final Report. Directorate-General Research, European Commission. Göteborg Stad. 2011. RiverCity Gothenburg. Göteborg Stad.
Hermansen, S. 2011. “The Samso̸ Project ― the Danish renewable energy island.” Presented in The Adlerbert Research Foundation Jubilee Conference. 22 Nov. University of Gothenburg.
House of Lords (UK). 2000. Science and Society. London: Committee of Science and Technology.
Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. 2010. “Changing Mass Priorities: The Link Between Modernization and Democracy.” Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), pp. 551~567.
Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen Science: a Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
ISO. 2010. Guidance on Social Responsibility(ISO 26000). Geneva: ISO.
Jones, S. 2012. “Sweden Wants Your Trash.” The Two-Way: NPR(National Public Radio). October 28.
Joss, S. and Durant, J. 1995. Public Participation in Science: the Role of Consensus Conference in Europe. London: Science Museum.
Kasemir, B., Jaeger, C. C. and Jäger, J. 2003a. “Citizen participation in sustainability assessment.” in B. Kasemir et al.(eds). Public Participation in Sustainability Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3~36.
Kasemir, B., Jäger, J., Jaeger, C. C. and Gardner, M. T. 2003b. “Preface.” in B. Kasemiret al.(eds). Public Participation in Sustainability Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: xxiii-xxv.
Keller, A. C. 2009. Science in Environmental Policy: The Politics of Objective Advice. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Kolbert, E. 2008. “The Island in the Wind: A Danish community’s victory over carbon emissions.” The New Yorker. July 7&14, pp. 68~77.
Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Cockburn, K. 2006. Science and Citizens: Local and Global Voices. IDS Policy Briefing No. 30. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Wynne, B. 2005. “Introduction: Science, Citizenship and Globalization.” in Science and Citizens(eds). Lodon: Zed Books, pp. 3~14.
Leach, Melissa and Scoones, Ian. 2003. Science and Citizenship in a Global Context. IDS Working Paper No. 205. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Leach, Melissa. 2007. Mobilising Citizens: Social Movements and the Politics of Knowledge. IDS Working Paper No. 276. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Lundqvist, Lennart J. 2001. “Implementation from Above: The Ecology of Power in Sweden's Environmental Governance.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 14(3), pp. 319~337.
Lundqvist, Lennart J. 2004. Sweden and Ecological Governance. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Mueller, M., Tippins, D. and Bryan, L. 2012. “The Future of Citizen Science.” Democracy & Education, 20(1), pp. 1~12.
O’connor, R. E. et al. 2000. “Stakeholder involvement in climate assessment: bridging the gap between scientific research and the public.” Climate Research. 14. pp. 255~260.
Obama, Barack. 2009. “Transcript: Inaugural Address.” The New York Times. Jan 20.
OECD. 2012a. Better Regulation in Europe: Denmark. Paris: OECD.
OECD. 2012b. Better Regulation in Europe: Sweden. Paris: OECD.
Persson, Bo. 2003. Typifying Scientific Advisory Structures and Scientific Advice Production Methodologies: The Cases of Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. Stockholm: SISTER(The Swedish Institute for Studies in Education and Research).
PlanEnergi and Samso̸ Energiakademi. 2007. Samso̸― a Renewable Energy Island: 10 years of Development and Evaluation. Samso̸: Samso̸ Energy Academy.
SABO(Swedish Association of Public Housing Companies). 2011. Profitable Energy Efficiency Improvements ― Myth or Opportunity. Stockholm: SABO.
Samso̸ Energy Academy. (Homepage: www.energiakademiet.dk).
Scherhaufer, P. 2011. “Identifying critical gap between the theory and praxis of stakeholder participation: Empirical lessons from climate change vulnerability studies.” Working paper submitted to NESS 2011. Stockholm.
Science and Trust Expert Group. 2012. 2012 Review of the Group Action Plan. London: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (UK).
Science for All Expert Group. 2010. Science For All: Report and Action Plan from the Science for All Expert Group. London: Department for Business Innovations & Skills (UK).
Soneryd, L. 2011. “Methods for Stakeholder Dialogue: The Shifting Meaning of Participation in Future Workshop Methodology.” Working paper submitted to NESS 2011. Stockholm.
Swedish Ministry of Environment. 2000. The Environmental Code(in English). Swedish Ministry of Environment.
The Delegation for Sustainable Cities. 2011. Rivercity Gothenburg Project Group: The Outcome of the International Workshop. City of Gothenburg.
The Economist. 2013. “Special Report: The Nordic Countries.” February 2.
Urban Development RiverCity Gothenburg. 2011. (www.udrcg.blogspot.com)
Wakeford, Tom. 2004. Democratising Technology: Reclaiming Science for Sustainable Development. Warwickshire: ITDG(Intermediate Technology Development Group).
Weichselgartner, J. and Kasperson, R. 2010. “Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental chance research.” Global Environmental Change, 20, pp. 266~277.
Welp, M. et al. 2006. “Science-based stakeholder dialogues: Theories and tools.” Global Environmental Change, 16, pp. 170~181.
Whitmarsh, L., Swartling, A.G. and Jäger, J. 2009. “Participation of Experts and Non-Experts in a Sustainability Assessment of Mobility.” Environmental Policy and Governance, 19, pp. 232~250.
Wiek, A., Farioli, F., Fukushi, K. and Yarime, M. 2012. “Sustainability Science: bringing the gap between science and society.” Sustainability Science, July, pp. 1~4.
Young, I. M. 2006. “Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model.” Social Philosophy and Policy, 23(1), pp. 102~130.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수