ISSN : 1225-6706
새정부가 들어서면서 ‘공공지원주택’, ‘공적 임대주택’이라는 새로운 용어가 등장했고, 이로 인해 공공임대주택 중심으로 추진돼 온 우리나라 저렴주택 공급 정책에 변화가 예상된다. 하지만, 새롭게 제시된 용어들을 정책적으로 어떻게 실체화할 것인지에 대해서는 아직 구체적인 논의가 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는 서울의 경험을 바탕으로 공공지원주택과 공공임대주택을 아우르는 공적 임대주택의 공급체계를 모색하는 데 초점을 두었다. 공적 임대주택을 뒷받침하는 이론적 논의, 공공임대주택 공급의 제약요인, 서울시 사회주택 정책의 경험 등을 검토하면서, 본 연구는 공공지원주택, 공적 임대주택의 용어를 지렛대로 삼아 기존 정책의 재구조화 또는 새로운 제도화를 모색하는 계기로 삼을 것을 주장했다. 그리고 그 일환으로 공공임대주택과 공공지원주택의 통합적 운영, 공공지원주택의 사업모델 확립, 주택도시기금과 재정 운용 원칙 재정립, 지자체의 역할 확대, 근거 법률의 정비를 중심으로 공적 임대주택 공급체계를 재정비할 것을 제안했다.
In 2017, new terms such as 'public assisted-private rental housing' and 'social housing' emerged when the new government was launched. As a result, changes in the public rental housing centered supply policy in Korea are expected. However, there is still a lack of concrete discussion on how to embody newly presented terms in housing policy. Therefore, this study focused on seeking a supply system for social housing that includes public rental housing and public assisted-private rental housing, based on the experience of Seoul Metropolitan Government. While examining theoretical arguments supporting social housing, constraints on the supply of public rental housing, and the experience of Seoul's Social Housing Policy, this study suggested that the terms of public assisted-private rental housing and social housing should be used as a trigger to restructure existing policies or to seek new institutionalization. As part of that, this study proposed the following tasks: (1) the integrated operation of public rental housing and public assisted-private rental housing, (2) establishing the supply model for public assisted-private rental housing, (3) re-establishing operation principles of the National Housing Fund of central government, (4) expanding the role of local governments, (5) amending the existing law to support the social housing policy.
국토교통부. 2016. 「주택도시기금 업무편람」.
국토교통부 보도자료. “집주인 임대주택 사업, 다양해지고 지원이 강화됩니다”(2017년 4월 6일).
김태성·성경륭. 1993. 「복지국가론」. 나남출판.
김혜승 외. 2004. 「주거복지 지원 및 전달체계 구축방안 연구」. 안양: 국토연구원.
남원석 외. 2016. 「서울공공주택 공급계획 수립 연구」. 서울특별시.
남원석 외. 2017. 「저소득가구 주거소요에 민감한 구조 갖추고 주거재생 확대하는 주택정책으로 전환 필요」. Issue Paper 2017-OR-05. 서울연구원.
남원석·임동현. 2017. 「시유지를 활용한 공공임대주택 공급가능량 분석: 서울시를 사례로」. 「한국주거학회논문집」, vol.28(4), 77∼84쪽.
Abrahamson, P. 1995, “Welfare Pluralism: Towards A New Consensus for a European Social Policy?” Current Politics and Economics of Europe, vol.5(1), pp.29∼42.
Bahle, T. 2003. “The Changing Institutionalization of Social Services in England and Wales, France and Germany: Is the Welfare State on the Retreat?” Journal of European Social Policy, vol.13(1), pp.5∼20.
CECODHAS. 2012. The Housing Europe Review 2012: The Nuts and Bolts of European Social Housing System. Brussels.
Doling, J. 1997. Comparative Housing Policy. Macmillan Press.
Earles, W. & J. Moon. 2000. “Pathways to the Enabling State: Changing Modes of Social Provision in Western Australian Community Services.” Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol.59(4), pp.11∼24.
Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. 1999. Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies. Oxford University Press.
Evers, A. 1990. “Shifts in the Welfare Mix: Introducing a New Approach for the Study of Transformations in Welfare and Social Policy.” in A. Evers & H. Wintersberger (eds.). Shifts in the Welfare Mix: Their Impact on Work. Social Services and Welfare Policies. Colorado: Westview Press, pp.7∼30.
Ha, S. 2004. “Housing Poverty and the Role of Urban Governance in Korea.” Environment & Urbanization, vol.16(1), pp.139∼153.
Haffner, M. et al. 2009. Bridging the Gap between Social and Market Rented Housing in Six European Countries. IOS Press.
Kemeny, J. 1995. From Public Housing to the Social Market: Rental Policy Strategies in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
Lawson, J. and V. Milligan. 2007. International Trends in Housing and Policy Responses. No.110. AHURI.
Lund, B. 1993. “An Agenda for Welfare Pluralism in Housing.” Social Policy &Administration, vol.27(4), pp.309∼322.
Oxley, M. et al. 2011. “Using the Private Rented Sector as a Form of Social Housing.” OTB Working Paper 2011-03. Delft University of Technology.
Skelton, I. 1997. “Planning Under Welfare Pluralism: Social Housing Targets and Allocations in Ontario, Canada.” Geoforum, vol.28(1), pp.79∼89.
Whitehead, C. 2007. Social Housing in Europe. LSE London.
吉原雅昭. 1991. 「Welfare Pluralismと福祉ミックス論: 英國と日本における社會福祉改革「論」についての一考察」. ≪社會問題研究≫, 第40巻 第1·2合併號, 147∼176쪽.
武川正吾. 2005. 「福祉國家と福祉社會の関係の再構築: 東北アジアのなかで考える」. 日本福祉大學COE推進委員會 編. 「福祉社會開発學の構築」. 京都:みネルヴァ書房, 35∼44쪽.
正村公宏. 2000. 「福祉國家から福祉社會へ: 福祉の思想と保障の原理」. 東京: 築摩書房.
국가통계포털. www.kosis.kr.