바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-6706
  • E-ISSN2733-4295
  • KCI

이동통치와 불안계급의 공간전략

Governmobility and the precariat’s spatial strategies

공간과 사회 / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2017, v.27 no.4, pp.9-35
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2017.27.4.9
신혜란 (서울대학교)

초록

이 연구는 현대사회에서 증가하는 불안정성과 개인들의 대응전략이 상호 구성하는 것을 공간과 이동 중심으로 보는 이론적 탐색이다. 불안계급 논의는 구조와개인의 문제를 통합하는 관점에서 현대사회의 특징을 볼 수 있게 하였다. 하지만이동을 주어진 조건으로 전제하여 이동에 내재되어 있는 권력의 문제, 불안정성과 공간전략의 상호작용에는 충분히 관심을 기울이지 않았다. 그 한계를 극복하기 위해 이 연구는 다음을 주장한다. 첫째, 불안사회에서 이동을 통한 통치와 그에 대한 개인들의 공간적 대응이 상호구성하며 순환한다. 자본과 인간의 이동은통치술이자 생존전략이며, 동원이자 자발이고, 동시에 그 복잡한 결합이다. 이동통치는 권력의 작동인 동시에 국가나 사회가 세계적 불안정성에 대응하는 공간전략이다. 둘째, 불안정화되는 사회구조와 그 전환 속에 놓인 사회구성원은 공간전략을 통해 항해하며 대응한다. 초국적 이주자의 사례에서 두드러지게 보이는 반복적 이동과 장소 만들기가 그러한 전략의 일환이며, 그 전략과 실천들이 서로상호작용한다.

keywords
이동, 통치, 불안계급, 공간전략, 불안정성, 항해, Precarity, precariat, mobilities, governing, governmobility, migrants, navigation

Abstract

This study introduces the concepts of governmobility and navigation to the conversation on precarity. This research analyzes the effects precarity has on the precariat while considering spatial strategies, mobilities, and interactive responses to precarity. By opening a discussion on the nature of contemporary societies, the study sees how people deemed to be the precariat work within the current social structure. Previous studies have treated mobilities as a given and not paid enough attention to the interactive dynamics of those mobilities on the precariat. Focusing on the governing and survival strategies of transnational migrants as an articulated example of the precariat, this research puts forth two arguments. First, mobilities of capital and population are complicated combinations of governmobilities, survival strategies, mobilization, and voluntary decisions. Governmobility refers to governing through mobilities, but it also constitutes the spatial strategy of the society and the nation state to manage global precarity. Second, migrants navigate the precarious and shifting social structure by developing social strategies including repeated mobilities and place-making.

keywords
이동, 통치, 불안계급, 공간전략, 불안정성, 항해, Precarity, precariat, mobilities, governing, governmobility, migrants, navigation

참고문헌

1.

곽노완. 2013. 「노동의 재구성과 기본소득」. ≪마르크스주의 연구≫, 제10권 제3호, 94∼114쪽.

2.

김동완·신혜란. 2016. 「대항품행 그리고 성미산 스타일」. ≪경제와 사회≫, 제111권, 174∼204쪽.

3.

박미선. 2017. 한국 주거불안계급의 특징과 양상: 1인 청년가구를 중심으로 . ≪공간과 사회≫, 제27권 4호, 110∼140쪽.

4.

박인권. 2017. 도시의 사회적 약자 불안정화 과정: 불안계급 이론의 비판과 확장. ≪공간과 사회≫, 제27권 4호, 36∼78쪽.

5.

신혜란. 2017. 이동통치와 불안계급의 공간전략 . ≪공간과 사회≫, 제27권 4호, 9∼35쪽.

6.

오세일·조재현. 2016. 「한국 사회의 삶의 질 저하 현상에 관한 사회학적 성찰-신자유주의 노동시장의 불안정성을 중심으로」. ≪생명연구≫, 제42권, 127∼167쪽.

7.

이광일. 2013. 「신자유주의 지구화시대, 프레카리아트의 형성과 ‘해방의 정치’」. ≪마르크스주의 연구≫, 제10권 제3호, 115∼143쪽.

8.

이병렬·김희자. 2011. 「한국이주정책의 성격과 전망」. ≪경제와 사회≫, 제90권, 320∼362쪽.

9.

이영아. 2017. 불안 공간과 도시 빈곤층의 불안한 삶 . ≪공간과 사회≫, 제27권 4호, 79∼109쪽.

10.

이진경. 2012. 「프롤레타리아트와 프레카리아트: 정규직 노동자와 비정규직 노동자의 비대칭성에 관하여」. ≪마르크스주의 연구≫, 제9권 제1호, 173∼201쪽.

11.

Bærenholdt, J. O. 2013. “Governmobility: The powers of mobility.” Mobilities, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 20∼34.

12.

Banki, S. 2013. “Precarity of place: A complement to the growing precariat literature.”Global Discourse, Vol. 3(3-4), pp. 450∼463.

13.

Barry, C. R. and P. W. Miller. 2005. “Do enclaves matter in immigrant adjustment?”City & Community, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 5∼35.

14.

Bastia, T. 2014. “Transnational Migration and Urban Informality: Ethnicity in Buenos Aires’ Informal Settlements.” Urban Studies, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 1810∼1825.

15.

Beck, U. 1992. Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

16.

Boncea, I. 2015. “Brain drain or circular migration: the case of Romanian physicians.” Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 32, pp. 649∼656.

17.

Butler, J. 2006. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.

18.

Cadman, L. 2010. “How (not) to be governed: Foucault, critique, and the political.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 539∼556.

19.

Castells, M. 1996. The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

20.

Castells, M. 1997. The power of identity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

21.

Castells, M. 1998. End of millenium. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

22.

Chauvin, S., and B. Garcés-Mascareñas. 2012. “Beyond Informal Citizenship: The New Moral Economy of Migrant Illegality.” International Political Sociology, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 241∼259.

23.

Coe, N. M. 2012. “Geographies of production III.” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 271∼284.

24.

Collins, F. L. 2012. “Transnational mobilities and urban spatialities: Notes from the Asia-Pacific.” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 316∼335.

25.

Conradson, D. and D. Mckay. 2007. “Translocal subjectivities: Mobility, connection, emotion.” Mobilities, Vol. 2, pp. 167∼174.

26.

Cresswell, T. 2006. On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. Taylor & Francis.

27.

Cresswell, T. 2014. “Mobilities III Moving on.” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 712∼721.

28.

Death, C. 2011. “Counter-conducts in South Africa: power, government and dissent at the world summit.” Globalizations, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 425∼438.

29.

El, H. 2009. “Constituting citizenship through the emotions: Singaporean transmigrants in London.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 99, pp. 788∼804.

30.

Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality. Volume one: An Introduction. Pantheon.

31.

Foucault, M. 1982. “The subject and power.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 777∼795.

32.

Gandini, A. 2015. “The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review.” ephemera, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 193∼205.

33.

Garbin, D. 2014. “Regrounding the sacred: transnational religion, place making and the politics of diaspora among the Congolese in London and Atlanta.” Global Networks, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 363∼382.

34.

Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford:Stanford university press.

35.

Guo, M., N. W. Chow and L. A. Palinkas. 2011. “Circular migration and life course of female domestic workers in Beijing.” Asian Population Studies, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 51∼67.

36.

Habermas, J. 1975. Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon.

37.

Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1. Trans. T. McCarthy. Toronto, Canada: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.

38.

Habermas, J. 1987. The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2. Trans. T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon.

39.

Huschke, S. 2014. “Fragile Fabric: Illegality Knowledge, Social Capital and Health-seeking of Undocumented Latin American Migrants in Berlin.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 40, No. 12, pp. 2010∼2029.

40.

Jensen, A. 2011. “Mobility, space and power: On the multiplicities of seeing mobility.”Mobilities, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 255∼271.

41.

Jørgensen, M. B. 2016. “Precariat-What it is and isn’t-Towards an understanding of what it does.” Critical Sociology, Vol. 42, No. 7-8, pp. 959∼974.

42.

Katila, S. and Ö. Wahlbeck. 2012. “The Role of (Transnational) Social Capital in the Start-up Processes of Immigrant Businesses: The Case of Chinese and Turkish Restaurant Businesses in Finland.” International Small Business Journal, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 294∼309.

43.

Kim, D. Y. 2017. “Resisting migrant precarity: a critique of human rights advocacy for marriage migrants in South Korea.” Critical Asian Studies, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 1∼17.

44.

Kim, Y., and HR. Shin, forthcoming. “Governed mobilities and the expansion of spatial capability of Vietnamese marriage migrant activist women in South Korea.”Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography.

45.

Lemke, T. 2002. “Foucault, governmentality, and critique.” Rethinking Marxism, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 49∼64.

46.

Lewis, H., P. Dwyer, S. Hodkinson, and L. Waite. 2015. “Hyper-precarious lives: Migrants, work and forced labour in the Global North.” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 580∼600.

47.

Lu, M. C., J. Zhang, H. L. Chee, and B. S. Yeoh. 2016. “Multiple mobilities and entrepreneurial modalities among Chinese marriage migrants in Malaysia.” Current Sociology, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 411∼429.

48.

Madanipour, A. 2017. “Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity and precarity.” Urban Studies, 0042098017705546.

49.

Massey, D. S., J. Arango, G. Hugo, A. Kouaouci, A., A. Pellegrino and J. E. Taylor. 1994. “An evaluation of international migration theory: The North American case.”Population and development Review, Vol. 20, Vol. 4, pp. 699∼751.

50.

McAreavey, R. 2012. “Resistance or resilience? Tracking the pathway of recent arrivals to a ‘new’rural destination.” Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 488∼507.

51.

Moisi, D. 2009. The geopolitics of emotions. How Cultures of Fear, Humiliation and Hope are Reshaping the World. London: The Bodley Head.

52.

Munck, R. 2013. “The Precariat: a view from the South.” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 747∼762.

53.

Neilson, B., and N. Rossiter. 2005. “From precarity to precariousness and back again: labour, life and unstable networks.” Fibreculture, Vol. 5, 022.

54.

Neilson, B. 2008. “Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception.” Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 25, No. 7-8, pp. 51∼72.

55.

Phillips, D. 2015. “Claiming spaces: British Muslim negotiations of urban citizenship in an era of new migration.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 62∼74.

56.

Qin, F. 2015. “Global talent, local careers: Circular migration of top Indian engineers and professionals.” Research Policy, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 405∼420.

57.

Reid-Musson, E. 2014. “Historicizing precarity: A labour geography of ‘transient’migrant workers in Ontario tobacco.” Geoforum, Vol. 56, pp. 161∼171.

58.

Rogaly, B. 2009. 2009. “Spaces of work and everyday life: labour geographies and the agency of unorganised temporary migrant workers.” Geography Compass, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 1975∼1987.

59.

Rogaly, B. 2009. “Spaces of work and everyday life: labour geographies and the agency of unorganised temporary migrant workers.” Geography Compass, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 1975∼1987.

60.

Roy, A. 2005. “Urban Informality: Toward An Epistemology of Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 147∼158.

61.

Roy, A., and N. AlSayyad. 2004. Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Oxford: Lexington Books.

62.

Schapendonk, J. 2017. “Navigating the migration industry: Migrants moving through an African-European web of facilitation/control.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1315522

63.

Schierup, C. U., R. Munck, B. Likic-Brboric and A. Neergaard, A. (Eds.). 2015. Migration, precarity, and global governance: Challenges and opportunities for labour. OUP Oxford.

64.

Schiller, N. G. and A. Çağlar. 2013. “Locating migrant pathways of economic emplacement:Thinking beyond the ethnic lens.” Ethnicities, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 494∼514.

65.

Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

66.

Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. “The new mobilities paradigm.” Environment and Planning A, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 207∼226.

67.

Sheller, M. 2016. “Uneven mobility futures: A Foucauldian approach.” Mobilities, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 15∼31.

68.

Shin, H. and S. Park. 2017. “The Regime of Urban Informality in Migration:Accommodating Undocumented Chosğnjok Migrants in their Receiving Community in Seoul, South Korea.” Pacific Affairs, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 459∼480.

69.

Standing, G. 2012. “The precariat: from denizens to citizens?” Polity, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 588∼608.

70.

Standing, G. 2016. The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

71.

Triandafyllidou, A. (Ed.). 2013. Circular migration between Europe and its neighbourhood: choice or necessity?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

72.

Vasudevan, A. 2015. “The makeshift city: Towards a global geography of squatting.”Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 338∼359.

73.

Vigh, H. 2009. “Motion squared: A second look at the concept of social navigation.”Anthropological Theory, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 419∼438.

74.

Waite, L. 2009. “A place and space for a critical geography of precarity?” Geography Compass, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 412∼433.

75.

Wang, H., W. Li, and Y. Deng. 2017 “Precarity among highly educated migrants: college graduates in Beijing, China.” Urban Geography, pp. 1∼20.

76.

Wang, Q. 2012 “Ethnic entrepreneurship studies in geography: a review.” Geography Compass, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 227∼240.

77.

Woon, C. Y. 2014. “Precarious geopolitics and the possibilities of nonviolence.” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 654∼670.

공간과 사회