바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

  • P-ISSN1225-6706
  • E-ISSN2733-4295
  • KCI

Smart City and Its Discontent:Smart City and the Dilemma of Urban Affect

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2021, v.31 no.3, pp.198-231
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2021.31.3.198

Abstract

In urban studies, the issue of affect has been surveyed from various angles. This paper critically assesses what affects implies to the smart city project. To this end, first, I clarify the fundamental purpose of smart cities. After explicating the notion of affect, I argue that the smart city project faces a dilemma concerning urban affect. Smart cities aim not only to solve or relieve problems of urbanization but also to improve the quality of urban life. Since affect is essential to the quality of life, smart cities must deal with improving positive urban affects as one of their central tasks. If they avoid this task, they will encounter affective alienation, the problem of neglecting affects essential to quality of life. If they do, they must collect and process massive biometric data of citizens, and this will lead to body surveillance, which is deeply problematic in terms of human rights. This situation raises a dilemma: if smart cities attempt to improve positive urban affect, they inevitably commit to the body surveillance, and if they do not concern urban affect, affect alienation occurs. As far as information and communication technologies, which enable massive data collecting and processing, are constitutive of smart cities, and in so far as affects are bodily phenomena in nature, it is hard to see how the smart city project can address this dilemma. If the analyses and arguments in this paper are on the right track, they will help us to reconsider what is missing in the smart city project.

keywords
스마트시티, 정동, 정서, 느낌, 삶의 질, 정동 소외, 신체 감시, 정동 계산, 정서 AI, smart city, affect, emotion, feeling, quality of life, affective alienation, body surveillance, affective computing, emotional AI

Reference

1.

김준수. 2018. 「한국의 발전주의 도시화와 ‘국가-자연' 관계의 재조정: 감응의 통치를 통해 바라본도시 비둘기」, 『공간과 사회』, 제28권, 1호, pp.55-100.

2.

대니얼 카너먼·에드 디너·노르베르트 슈바르츠. 2020. 『행복의 과학』, 임종기 옮김, 아카넷.

3.

도승연. 2017. “푸코(Foucault)의 `문제화` 방식으로 스마트시티를 사유하기”, 『공간과 사회』, 제59권, 0호, pp.15-38.

4.

리사 펠드먼 배럿. 2018. 『감정은 어떻게 만들어지는가?』, 최호영 옮김, 생각연구소.

5.

멜리사 그레그·그레고리 시그워스 편저. 2016. 『정동 이론』, 최성희·김지영·박혜정 옮김, 갈무리.

6.

박배균. 2020. 「스마트 도시론의 급진적 재구성: 르페브르의 ‘도시혁명’론을 바탕으로」, 『공간과 사회』, 제30권, 2호, pp.141-171.

7.

박주상. 2007. 「유비쿼터스 기술을 활용한 범죄예방 활동」, 『한국콘텐츠학회논문지』, 제7권, 1호, pp.169-175.

8.

박준·유승호. 2017. 「스마트시티의 함의에 대한 비판적 이해: 정보통신기술, 거버넌스, 지속가능성, 도시개발 측면을 중심으로」, 『공간과 사회』, 제27권, 1호, pp.128-155.

9.

브라이언 마수미. 2018. 『정동정치』, 조성훈 옮김, 갈무리.

10.

신진숙. 2019. 「조선산업을 통해 본 산업도시의 정동 정치: 정동적 도시론을 중심으로」, 『대한지리학회지』, 제54권, 2호, pp.177-198.

11.

신진숙. 2020. 「철원의 문화적 재현을 통해 본 접경도시의 정동적 지형학」, 『통일인문학』, 제82권, pp.231-276.

12.

신현준. 2016. 「아시아 도시의 대안적 공간화 실천을 위한 서설(序說): 정동, 공간, 정치」, 『사이間SAI』, 제21권, pp.287-325.

13.

전명근·문기영. 2005. 「생체정보 이용과 프라이버시 보호」, 『情報保護學會誌』, 제15권, 6호, pp.11-18.

14.

최봉문. 2011. 「‘스마트’ 용어의 적용사례 분석을 통한 ‘스마트시티’의 개념정립을 위한 연구」, 『한국콘텐츠학회논문지』, 제11권, 12호, pp.943-994.

15.

최원. 2016. 「‘정동 이론` 비판: 알튀세르의 이데올로기론과의 쟁점을 중심으로」, 『문화과학』, 제86호, pp.82-112.

16.

폴 애크먼. 2020. 『표정의 심리학』, 허우성·허주형 옮김, 바다출판사.

17.

4차산업혁명위원회. 2018. 도시혁신 및 미래성장동력 창출을 위한 스마트시티 추진전략

18.

TTA. 2018. 4차 산업혁명 핵심 융합사례: 스마트시티 개념과 표준화 현황.

19.

중소벤쳐기업부·TIPA·NICE평가정보. 2018. 중소기업 전략기술로드맵: 스마트시티.

20.

Anderson, B. 2006. “Becoming and being hopeful: towards a theory of affect”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol.24, pp.733-752.

21.

Anderson, B. and Holden, A. 2008. “Affective Urbanism and the Event of Hope”, Space and Culture, Vol.11, no.2, pp.142-159.

22.

Bullington, J. 2005. “'Affective' computing and emotion recognition systems: the future of biometric surveillance?”, Proceedings of the 2nd annual conference on Information security curriculum development, pp.95–99.

23.

Bollen, J., Mao, H. and Pepe, A. 2011. “Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena”. Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Vol.5, no.1, https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14171

24.

CenterforCities. 2014. ”What is a Smart City?” https://www.centreforcities.org/reader/smartcities/what-is-a-smart-city/ (최종검색일: 2021년 2월 26일)

25.

Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., Danigelis, N.L., Dickinson, J., Elliott, C., Farley, J., Gayer, D.E., Glenn, L.M., Hudspeth, T.R., Mahoney, D.F., McCahill, L., McIntosh, B., Reed, B., Rizvi, A.T., Rizzo, D.M., Simpatico, T., Snapp, R., Mainguy, G. 2008. “An Integrative Approach to Quality of Life Measurement, Research, and Policy", S.A.P.I.EN.S. Vol.1, no.1, https://journals.openedition.org/sapiens/169

26.

DataCulture&Society. “Large Grant Win Will Facilitate Research on Emotional AI in Smart Cities at the University of Edinburgh” https://www.cdcs.ed.ac.uk/news/large-grant-win-will-facilitate-researchemotional-ai-smart-cities?fbclid=IwAR08BXpETTB38Ww5SxBBk6K2xxGcgtxqUVsjadMV0Fmx-YSu4gdriBCTwuA (최종검색일: 2021년 2월 27일)

27.

De Choudhury, M. Counts, S., and Gamon, M. 2012. “Not all moods are created equal! exploring human emotional states in social media”. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol.6, no.1, https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14279

28.

Farvizi, L. 2014. City Mood, Master Thesis, Malmö University.

29.

Gao, Y., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., and Meng, H. 2012. “What does touch tell us about emotions in touchscreen based gameplay?” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Article No.31https://doi.org/10.1145/2395131.2395138

30.

Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M., and Whatmore, S. eds. 2009. "Quality of Life". Dictionary of Human Geography (5th ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

31.

Holland, R. 2008. “Will the real smart city please stand up?: Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?”. City, Vol.12, no.3, pp.303-320.

32.

Jabbari J.A., Man, O.M., Shrisankaraan, V.S., and Trevan, J. 2019. International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction (ICSIC), pp.571-576.

33.

Kahneman, D. and Deaton, A. 2010. “High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol.107, no.38, pp.16489–16493.

34.

Kim, H. and Choi, Y. 2012. “Exploring emotional preference for smartphone applications”. IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), pp. 245-249.

35.

Kitchin, R. and Dodge, M. 2011. Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

36.

Kushner, L. 2019. “A Smart City Is Rarely Smart Enough to Account for People’s Feelings” https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-14/in-san-francisco-a-smart-city-copes-withemotions?fbclid=IwAR3P4kT3QrHnWDDz4EfB6xjljq9FMSYXXrK7yvBmp4f4spjIcW3pdIy2Mgo (최종검색일: 2021년 2월 27일)

37.

Layard, R. 2006. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Penguin.

38.

Lin, C., Zhao, G., Yu, C., Wu, Y.J. 2019. “Smart City Development and Residents’ Well-Being”Sustainability, Vol.11, no.3, 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030676

39.

LiKamWa, R, Liu, Y., Lane, N.D., and Zhong, L. 2013. “Moodscope: Building a mood sensor from smartphone usage patterns”. Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. pp.389–402. https://doi.org/10.1145/2462456.2464449

40.

Nielek, R. and Wierzbicki, A. 2010. “Emotion aware mobile application”. In: Pan JS., Chen SM., Nguyen N.T. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications. ICCCI 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol.6422. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16732-4_14

41.

Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. eds. 1993. The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

42.

Picard, R. 1997. Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

43.

Picard, R. and Klein, J. 2002. “Computers that recognize and respond to user emotion: Theoretical and practical implications”, Interacting with Computers, Vol.14, pp.141-169.

44.

Reynolds, C. and Picard, R. 2004. Affective sensors, privacy, and ethical contracts. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp.1103-1106.

45.

Scherer, K., Johnstone, T. and Klasmeyer, G. 2003. “Vocal expression of emotion”. Handbook of affective sciences, pp.433–456.

46.

Smartcity. 2020. “Smart Cities Still Have A Long Way To Go Before Using Emotional AI” https://www.smartcity.press/emotional-ai (최종검색일: 2021년 2월 27일)

47.

SmarDubai. 2019. “HAPPINESS AGENDA”, https://www.smartdubai.ae/initiatives/happiness-agenda (최종검색일: 2021년 2월 21일)

48.

Thrift, N. 2007. Non-representational Thepry: Space, politics, affect, London and New York:Routledge

49.

Townsend, A.M. 2013. Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

50.

Yoon, J. 2011. “Cisco to spend $47 mil. on Songdo”, The Korea Times, https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/tech/2020/07/129_90217.html (최종검색일: 2021년 2월 26일)

51.

Yu, C., Ye, B., Lin, C., and Wu, Y.J. 2020. “Can Smart City Development Promote Residents’ Emotional Well-Being? Evidence From China”, IEEE Access, Vol.8, pp.116024-116040.

Space and Environment