바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

Exploring the Possibility of Critical Studies on Logistics in the Era of the Covid-19 Pandemic

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2021, v.31 no.4, pp.92-121
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2021.31.4.92

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to explore the possibility of critical studies on logistics by examining the structural changes of the mobilities regime in Korean society, particularly the changes of logistics as knowledge/power system as well as logistical media technology, which emerged in the current Covid-19 pandemic. It aims to examine the meaning and importance of a critical approach to the logistic knowledge/power system and logistical media technology while looking at the recent changes in Korean society from the perspective of changes in the knowledge/power system and media technologies related to logistics. First, this paper will examine the concept and origin of logistics focusing on the power-ridden characteristics of the logistic knowledge/power system. Next, this paper will address the two characteristic aspects of modern logistics in the shifting mode of capital accumulation through the establishment of global supply chains: the articulation of modern logistics with the financial system and the use of digital technologies by the modern logistics. In conclusion, in the historical conjuncture of today's pandemic, the changes of the capital accumulation regime in the global supply-chain capitalism will be examined. It is also discussed how they are related to the core theme of critical studies on logistics. I will also discuss on the implications of today's pandemic situation for both critical studies on logistics and the existing media cultural studies.

keywords
Supply-chain capitalism, Logistics, Logistical media, Mobilities, Pandemic, 공급망 자본주의, 로지스틱스, 로지스틱스 미디어, 모빌리티, 팬데믹

Reference

1.

강내희, 2011. 「미래할인의 관행과 일상문화의 변화」. 《경제와 사회》, 통권 92권, 42~71쪽.

2.

김성해ㆍ안병억, 2007. 『글로벌시대 금융저널리즘의 이해』, 서울: 한국언론재단.

3.

김수철. 2020. “인프라스트럭처와 모빌리티연구”, 『모빌리티 인프라스트럭처와 생활세계』 (8∽35쪽), 김수철 외 지음. 서울: 앨피.

4.

박대민, 2014. 「금융에 관한 문화연구를 위한 시론: 금융시장과 생활세계 간의 경계에 대한 탐구를 위하여」. 《한국언론학보》, 제58권 1호, 95∽122쪽.

5.

박성우, 2016. 「기술적 대상과 디지털 밀리유의 정치경제학: 질베르 시몽동과 기술문화연구의 접합」. 《문화와 정치》, 제3권 2호, 155∽173쪽.

6.

박승일, 2021. 『기계, 권력, 사회』, 고양: 사월의책.

7.

송준영, 2021/11/8. 「‘구조적 변화에 물류대란까지’...각광받는 물류리츠」, 《시사저널e》, URL: http://www.sisajournal-e.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=241654 (최종검색일: 2021년 11월 20일).

8.

신병현, 2014. 「금융화 시기 지대의 독점적 조직화와 문화과정」. 《경제와사회》, 통권 103권, 247∽277쪽.

9.

이현식, 2021/11/22. 「요소수 다음은? 탈(脫)세계화 거센 파도 맞닥뜨린 한국호」, 《SBS》, URL: https://n.news.naver.com/article/055/0000934606 (최종검색일: 2021년 11월 20일).

10.

이희은, 2019. 「5G 이동통신과 미디어 테크놀로지의 물질성: 인프라로서의 미디어 네트워크를 향한 탐색적 연구」, 《문화와 정치》 제6권 2호, 233∽262쪽.

11.

존 피터스, 2018. 『자연과 미디어: 고래에서 클라우드까지, 원소 미디어의 철학을 향해』, 이희은 역, 서울: 컬처룩.

12.

Cowen, Deborah. 2014. The Deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping Violence in Global Trade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

13.

Creveld, van Martin. 1977. Supplying the War: Logistics From Wallerstein to Patton, 2nd. ed. 2004. New York: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Davis, Angela. 2017. “An Interview on the Future of Black Radicalism.” In Futures of Black Radicalism, ed. Gaye Theresa Johnson and Alex Lubin, (pp. 241–48). London: Verso.

15.

Graeber, David. 2011. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House. 『부채, 그 첫 5000년』, 정명진 역, 2011, 부글북스.

16.

Grossberg, Lawrence. 2010. Modernity and commensuration. Cultural Studies, vol. 24 no. 3, pp. 295~332.

17.

Han, Clara. 2018. Precarity, Precariousness, and Vulnerability. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 47, pp. 331-43.

18.

Lazzarato, Maurizio. 2012. The Making of the Indebted Man: An Essay on the Neoliberal Condition, trans. Joshua David Jordan. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).

19.

Martin, Randy. 2002. Financialization of Daily Life. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

20.

Mezzadra, Sandra & Neilson, Brett. 2019. The Politics of Operations: Excavating contemporary capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

21.

Neilson, Brett. 2012. Five theses on understanding logistics as power. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 13 no. 3. pp. 323-340.

22.

Reich, Robert. 2020. ‘Covid-19 pandemic shines a light on a new kind of class divide and its inequalities,’ The Guardian, April 26, 2020. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/25/covid-19-pandemic-shines-a-light-on-a-new-kind-of-class-divide-and-its-inequalities (최종검색일: 2021년 11월 12일).

23.

Rossiter, Ned. 2016. Logistical Nightmares: Infrastructure, Software, Labour. London: Routledge.

24.

Peters, D. John, 2015. The Marvelous Clouds: Towards the Philosophy of Elemental Media. 『자연과 미디어: 고래에서 클라우드까지, 원소 미디어의 철학을 향해』, 이희은 역, 서울: 컬처룩, 2018.

25.

Peters, D. John. 2005. Technology and Ideology: Telegraph revisited. in Thinking With James Carey: Essays on Communication, Transportation, History. Eds. Jeremy Packer and Craig Robertson (pp. 137-155). New York: Peter Lang.

26.

Sassen, Saskia. 2014. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 『축출자본주의: 복잡한 세계경제가 낳은 잔혹한 현실』, 박슬라 역, 2016, 글항아리.

27.

Searcey, Dionne, Forsythe, Michael & Lipton, Eric. 2021/11/20. ‘A Power Struggle Over Cobalt Rattles the Clean Energy Revolution,’ The New York Times, Nov. 11th, 2021. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/20/world/china-congo-cobalt.html?smid=url-share (최종검색일: 2021년 12월 19일)

28.

Siegert, Bernhard. 2015. Cultural Techniques: Grids, filters, doors, and other articulations of the real (meaning systems). trans. by Geoffrey Withrop-Young. New York: Fordam University Press.

29.

Siegert, Bernhard. 2007. Cacography or Communication? Cultural Techniques in German Media Studies, Grey Room vol. 29, pp. 26-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/grey.2007.1.29.26.

30.

Tsing, Anna. 2009. Supply Chains and the Human Condition. Rethinking Marxism vol. 21 no. 2, pp. 148–76.

31.

Tsing, Anna. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: on the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Space and Environment