바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Scientism and the reorganization of gendered definitions of emotion–196,70s Jounal 『Yeohaksaeng』

Feminism and Korean Literature / Feminism and Korean Literature, (P)1229-4632; (E)2733-5925
2019, v.0 no.48, pp.295-322
https://doi.org/10.15686/fkl.2019..48.295
Sun-Ok Lee
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This paper closely analyzes the discourse of scientism and the construction of gender in 1960s and 1970s South Korea. Existing scholarship on the 1960s and 1970s often discusses cold war politics, militarism, the New Town Movement, and the discourse of productivity. To supplement this scholarship, this essay designates scientism as an additional defining characteristic of this period in South Korean history. More specifically, I explicate the formation of the concept of girlness through an analysis articles appearing in the magazine 『Yeohaksaeng』(Schoolgirl). I show that the nature of editorials appearing in 『Yeohaksaeng』 differ greatly from the 1960s to 1970s. Articles from the 1960s concentrate on ideal constructions of girlhood. In particular, controlling one’s emotions and taking care of one’s body constitute a large portion of writing from this decade. The emotions of girls are spoken of in terms of cheerfulness, sentimentality, vanity, and jealously. Among these, cheerfulness and sentimentality are the main terms defining emotions and temperament. Cheerfulness is the main term used to define the ideal personality of the girl. Images of ideal girlness describe young girls as a bouquet of flowers which brightens the lives of family members. The undesirable personality of the girl is defined by excessive sentimentality, vanity, and jealousy. The concept of cheerfulness is inseparable from the state policy of creating a “cheerful society.” Indeed, ideal girlhood can be seen as a representation of the state ideology of cheerfulness. It was typical for so-called “cheerful novels” and romance to appear in 『Yeohaksaeng』, which demonstrates the interconnectedness of discourses informing the concept of girlness. Indeed, the redefining of emotional temperament centered on the nature of girlness. In this essay, the discourse of scientism (including discourses on hormones and puberty) is analyzed for how it was deployed to naturalize the concept of girlness and proper emotional temperament. The era of the 1970s can be said to begin on December 5th, 1968 with the promulgation of the National Charter for Education. The 1970s signals the full-scale arrival of the enlightenment period and magazine articles typically emphasized the need for the discipline and management of rebellious youth. The 1970s emerged as a decade distinguishing between polluted girlness and pure girlness. An article from August 1970 titled “The Absconding of Schoolgirls” succinctly reflects the dominant discourse of the period. Articles discussing “wandering runway teenagers,” purity, and relations with the opposite sex increased dramatically during this period. In addition, considerable emphasis was placed on the category of shame as an important emotional category. Commercialized eroticism also emerged as the dominant culture in the 1970s. This period saw a rapid increase in girls moving to Seoul and working in factories which necessitated the management and discipline of young girls. In this context, it is significant that shame became a concept central to emotional health. Indeed, the directing of shame and hatred toward specific nefarious individuals can be viewed within the larger project of forming uniform subjects of the state. Modern state-building projects sought to create uniform subjects for the purpose of guaranteeing male labor power and restoring eroded post-war male subjectivity. Moreover, the concept of girlness is also intimately related to the transformation of the productive power of the male into the “mechanical body.” It can be deduced that the discarding of the fragile, imperfect, and shameful physical body was achieved through the construction of girlness. The reorganization of gendered definitions of emotion in the 1960s and 1970s is one method for conducting an analysis of making national body under Park Chung-hee’s modernization project.

keywords
1960s, 1970s, Park Chung-hee’s modernization project, magazine 『Yeohaksaeng』(Schoolgirl), emotion, gender, 과학주의, 1960년대, 1970년대, 박정희근대화프로젝트, 잡지 여학생, 감정, 젠더

Reference

1.

『여학생』, 여학생사, 1965.12월-1990.11월

2.

공제욱, 『국가와 일상』, 한울, 2008, 14-15쪽.

3.

니시카와 나가오, 윤대석 역, 『국민이라는 괴물』, 소명출판, 2002, 32쪽-69쪽.

4.

루쓰 코완, 김성희 외 공역, 『과학기술과 가사노동』, 도서출판신정, 1997, 175-177쪽.

5.

마사 너스바움, 조계숙 역, 『혐오와 수치심』, 민음사, 2015, 205쪽, 367, 378~384쪽.

6.

미셸 푸코, 박홍규 역, 『감시와 처벌』, 강원대출판부, 1993, 185-190쪽.

7.

송성수 편역, 『우리에게 기술은 무엇인가』, 도서출판녹두, 1995, 28-43쪽.

8.

권인숙, 「1950-1970년대 청소년의 남성성 형성과 국민 만들기의 성별화 과정」, 『한민족운동사연구』 제56권, 한국민족운동사학회, 2008, 281-321쪽.

9.

김양선, 「1960년대 여성의 문학・교양 형성의 세대적 특성:잡지 『여학생』의 문학란을 중심으로」, 『현대문학이론연구』 제61집, 현대문학이론학회, 2015, 27-49쪽.

10.

김윤경, 「해방 후 여학생 연구」, 『비평문학』 제47권, 한국비평문학회, 2013, 37-62쪽.

11.

김지영, 「1960-1970년대 청소년과학소설 장르 연구-『한국과학소설(SF)전집』(1975) 수록 작품을 중심으로」, 『동남어문논집』 제35집, 동남어문논집, 2013, 125-149쪽.

12.

나윤경, 「60-70년대 개발국가 시대의 학생잡지를 통해서 본 10대 여학생 주체형성과 관련한 담론분석」, 『한국민족운동사연구』 제56권, 한국민족운동사학회, 2008, 323-374쪽.

13.

송효정, 「실험실의 미친 과학자와 제국주의적 향수」, 『대중서사연구』 제20권3호, 대중서사학회, 2014, 271-308쪽.

14.

이선옥, 「1960년대 과학주의담론의 신체화—잡지 『여학생』에 나타난 소녀와 사춘기」, 『여성문학연구』 제42호, 한국여성문학학회, 2017, 225-254쪽.

15.

이선옥, 「1960년대 과학주의와 젠더의 재구성—『사상계』를 중심으로」, 『여성문학연구』 제39호, 한국여성문학학회, 2016, 261-302쪽.

16.

장수경, 「1960년대 과학소설의 팽창주의 욕망과 남성성」, 『아동청소년문학연구』 제23호, 아동청소년문학학회, 2018, 245-277쪽.

17.

정미지, 「1960년대 문학소녀 표상과 독서양상 연구」, 성균관대학교 석사논문, 2011, 1-140쪽.

18.

조계숙, 「국가이데올로기와 SF, 한국 청소년 과학소설—『학생과학』지 수록작을중심으로」, 『대중서사연구』 제20권3호, 대중서사학회, 2014, 415-441쪽.

19.

천정환, 「교양의 재구성, 대중의 재구성: 박정희 군사독재 시대의 ‘교양’과 자유교양운동」, 『한국현대문학연구』 제35집, 한국현대문학회, 2011, 281-315쪽.

20.

최애순, 「우주시대의 과학소설—1970년대 아동전집 SF를 중심으로」, 『한국문학이론과비평』 제60집, 한국문학이론과비평, 2013, 213-242쪽.

21.

허 윤, 「1960년대 불량소녀의 지형학」, 『대중서사연구』 제20권 2호, 대중서사학회, 2014, 103-130쪽.

Feminism and Korean Literature