A Study on the Korean-American’s Sense of Place Type and Characteristic of NGO’s for North Korea Place-Based Psychological Approach

오인혜

doi:10.19097/kaser.2014.24.4.121

Space and Environment

P-ISSN1225-6706
E-ISSN2733-4295
KCI

Home

ISSN : 1225-6706

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.24 No.4

Citation Share

A Study on the Korean-American’s Sense of Place Type and Characteristic of NGO’s for North Korea Place-Based Psychological Approach

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295

2014, v.24 no.4, pp.121-159

https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2014.24.4.121

(2014). A Study on the Korean-American’s Sense of Place Type and Characteristic of NGO’s for North Korea Place-Based Psychological Approach. Space and Environment, 24(4), 121-159, https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2014.24.4.121

copy

Abstract

This study is from the perspective of the place-based psychology and aims atunderstanding the links of Korean-American’s sense of place and their preferredactivities in North Korea. The Korean-American contributed to the establishmentof Pyongyang General Hospital, Pyongyang University of Science and Technology,actively engaged in human rights movement in North Korea, and preparing to proposethe North Kore Orphans Adoption Law to the Congress. The sense of placetoward North Korea is divided into four categories based of Korean American’sviewpoint of North Korea; ethnic topophilia, ethnic topophobia, other topophilia,other topophobia. This study tried to explain the NGO activities in view of theirsense of place and intense experiences in North Korea. It is found that ‘the ethnictopophilia group’ concentrates on various exchange programs and official aid activitiesgeared to unification, while ‘the other topophilia group’ is more for internationalaids and USA-North Korea exchanges seeing North Korea as a less-developed countryor a country of extreme poverty, ‘the ethnic topophobia group’ helping NorthKorean defectors and non-official aids activities, and ‘the other topophobia group’indifferent, sympathize with the hawkish attitude of the mainstream Americans supportingputting pressure on North Korea.

keywords: 장소감, 장소심리학, 토포필리아, 토포포비아, 대북 NGO, Sense of Place, Place-based Psychology, Topophilia, Topophobia, NGOs for North Korea

Reference

강상경. 2011. 인간행동과 사회환경 . 나남신서.

강연안. 2005. 레비나스의 철학 . 문학과 지성사.

구동회. 2010. ｢로컬리티 연구에 관한 방법론적 논쟁｣. ≪국토지리학회지≫, 44(4),509～523쪽.

권영락. 2005. ｢장소기반 환경교육에서 장소감의 발달과 환경의식의 변화: ‘시화호생명지킴이’ 생태안내자 양성과정을 사례로｣. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

김동수. 1992. ｢북미 이산가족의 북한 고향방문 조사보고｣. ≪월간사회평론≫, 92(10), 54～69쪽.

김병로. 2009. ｢실용주의 대북정책 구상－대북지원과 인권의제를 중심으로｣. 서울대학교 통일평화연구원. ≪통일과 평화≫, 1, 207～242쪽.

김용창. 2011. ｢지역연구의 부활, 시대 공간 역사성의 조사와 기록, Museum Review｣ (서울역사박물관), 2, 34～47쪽.

김유정. 2010. ｢내 형제를 지키는 자: 교포 정체성 역학과 북한 인권운동｣. 서울대학교 국제대학원 석사학위논문.

김태현 외 2003. ｢외교정책 신념체계와 국가 이미지에 관한 실증 사례 연구: 한국인들의 북한 이미지를 중심으로｣. ≪한국정치학회보≫, 37(3), 151～174쪽.

10.

김택환. 2000. ｢남북정상회담 이후 북한 이미지: 한국 언론과 북한 전문가들의 북한이미지 변화를 중심으로｣. ≪계간사상≫, 9, 145～170쪽.

11.

류우익. 1978. ｢지리학에 있어서 공간개념의 문제에 대하여｣. ≪지리학논총≫, 5, 서울대학교 사회과학대학 지리학과, 55～65쪽.

12.

리처드 니스벳, 최인철 역. 2004. 생각의 지도 , 김영사(Richard E. Nisbett. 2003. The Geography of Thought, Brockman).

13.

박명규 외. 2011. ｢현상과 이미지－북한 이미지의 측정과 분석｣. ≪통일과 평화≫, 3(1), 129～173쪽.

14.

베노 베를렌, 안영진 역. 2003. 사회공간론 , 한울아카데미(Werlen, B. 1987. Sozialgeographie, Paul Haupt Berne).

15.

안득기. 2008. ｢대북지원 NGO의 기능과 역할에 관한 연구｣. ≪북한연구학회보≫, 12(2), 179～210쪽.

16.

에드워드 렐프, 김덕현 외 역. 2005. 장소와 장소상실 , 논형(Relph, E. 1976. Place and Placelessness. Pion Limited).

17.

이은숙. 2004. ｢해방 전 재미한인 이민문학에 나타난 고향의식과 그 지리적 의미｣. ≪문화역사지리≫, 16(1), 183～196쪽.

18.

이정만. 1998. ｢도시문화지리학에 있어서 ‘문화’와 ‘환경’의 개념｣. ≪대한지리학회지≫, 33, Special Edition, 677～684쪽.

19.

이-푸 투안, 구동회·심승회 역. 2005. 공간과 장소 . 대윤(Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press).

20.

이-푸 투안, 이옥진 역. 2011. 토포필리아－환경지각, 태도, 가치의 연구 . 부산대학교 한국민족문화연구소 로컬리티 번역총서 L6(Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1974. Topophilia:A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Prentice Hall Inc.).

21.

조아라. 2007. ｢문화관광지의 지역성 재구성 과정｣. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.

22.

최종오. 2010. 인간행동과 사회환경의 이해 . 홍익출판사.

23.

폴트루니에, 정동섭·박영민 역. 1995. 모험으로 사는 인생 . IVP(Tournier, P. 1965. L’aventure do la vie. Delachaux et Niestle, Neuchated et Paris).

24.

허근. 1994. ｢재미교포의 대북경제교류, 현황과 의미: 시장경제체제 접목시키는 인적자원｣. ≪통일한국≫, 5, 42～45쪽.

25.

홍기선 외. 1980. ｢재미교포의 대한 안보관에 대한 연구－나성지역에서의 설문조사｣. 한국언론학회, ≪한국언론학보≫, 83～106쪽.

26.

Auburn, T. & R. Barnes. 2006. “Producing Place: A Neo-Schutzian Perspective on the ‘Psychology of Place’.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, pp. 38～50.

27.

Bardo, J. W. 1976. “Dimensions of Community Satisfaction in a British New Town.” Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research, 2, pp. 129～134.

28.

Billig, M. 2006. “Is My Home My Castle? Place Attachment, Risk Perception, and Religious Faith.” Environment and Behavior, 38(2), pp. 248～265.

29.

Butz, D. and Eyles. 1997. “Reconceptualizing Senses of Place: Social Relations, Ideology and Ecology.” Geografiska Annaler, 79B(1), pp. 1～25.

30.

Canter, D. V. 1975. Environmental Interaction: Psychological Approaches to Our Physical Surroundings. Surrey University Press.

31.

Canter, D. V. 1977. The Psychology of Place. Palgrave Macmillan.

32.

Cohen, A. P. 1982. Belonging: Identity and Social Organisation in British Rural Cultures. Manchester University Press.

33.

Cottrell, C. A. and S. L. Neuberg. 2005. “Different Emotional Reactions to Different Groups: A Sociofunctional Threat-Based Approach to ‘Prejudice’, 2005.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), pp. 770～789.

34.

De Young, R. 1999. “Environmental Psychology.” in D. E., Alexander & R. W. Fairbridge (Eds.). Encylopedia of Environmental Science. Retrieved from http://www-personal.umich.edu/～rdeyoung/envtpsych.html.

35.

Foucault, M. 1986. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics, 16, pp. 22～27.

36.

Giuliani, M. V. and R. Feldman. 1993. “Place Attachment in a Developmental and Cultural context.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, pp. 267～274.

37.

Golledge, R. G. and R. J. Stimson. 1997. Spatial Behavior-A Geographic Perspective. The Guilford Press: New York. & Unwin.

38.

Hall, E. T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, N.Y.

39.

Hewitt, J. P. 1991. Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology (5th ed.). Boston:Allyn & Bacon.

40.

Jorgensen, B. S. and R. C. Stedman. 2001. “Sense of Place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners Attitudes Toward their Properties.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, pp. 233～248.

41.

Korpela, K. M. and M. Ylen. 2007. “Perceived Health is Associated with Natural Favourite Places in the Vicinity.” Health & Place, 13(1), pp. 138～151.

42.

Lalli, M. 1992. “Urban-related identity: Theory, Measurement, and Empirical Finding.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(4), pp. 285～303.

43.

Manzo, L. C. 2003. “Beyond House and Haven: Toward a Revisioning of Emotional Relationship with Place.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, pp. 47～61.

44.

Manzo, L. C. and D. D. Perkins. 2006. “Finding Common Ground: The Importance of Place Attachment to Community Participation and Planning.” Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), pp. 335～350.

45.

Marcus, C. C. 1995. “House as a Mirror of Self: Explore the Deeper Meaning of Home.” http://architecture.about.com/od/productreviews/fr/housemirror.htm.

46.

Marcus, C. C. and M. Barnes. 1999. Healing Gardens: Therapentic Benefits and Design Recommendations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York

47.

Matz, D. C. and W. Wood. 2005. “Cognitive Dissonance in Groups: The Consequences of Disagreement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), pp. 22～37.

48.

Moore, R. L. and A. R. Graefe. 1994. “Attachments to Recreation Settings: the Case of Rail-Trail Users.” Leisure Sciences, 16, pp. 17～31.

49.

Nash, C. 1998. “Mapping Emotion Environment and Planning D.” Society and Space, 16(1), pp. 1～10.

50.

Passi, A. 1986. “The Institutionalization of Regions: A Theoretical Framework of Understanding the Emergence of Regions and the Constitution of Regional Identity.” Femmia, 164(1), pp. 105～146.

51.

Piaget, J. 1953. Logic and Psychology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

52.

Proshansky, H. M. Fabian, A. K. and R. Kaminoff. 1983. “Place-Identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), pp. 57～83.

53.

Sarason, S. B. 1974. The Psychological Sense of Community: Prospects for a Community Psychology. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.

54.

Semken, S. and C. B. Freeman. “Sense of Place in the Practice and Assessment of Place-Based Science Teaching.” Science Education, 92, pp. 1042～1057.

55.

Shin, G. W. and K. J. Lee. 2011. U.S. - DPRK Educational Exchanges - Assessment and Future Strategy, Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center Books, Stanford University.

56.

Soja, E. 1995. “Postmodern Urbanisation: The Six Restructurings of Los angeles.” in K. Gibson and S. Watson(eds.). Postmodern Cities and Spaces, Cambridge, pp. 125～137.

57.

Stedman, R. C. 2002. “Toward a Social Psychology of Place - Predicting Behavior from Place-Based Cognitions, Attitude, and Identity.” Environment and Behavior, 34(5), pp. 561～581.

58.

Tuan, Yi-Fu, 1976. “Humanistic Geography.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 66, pp. 206～276.

59.

Ulrich, R. S. 1992. “Effects of Interior Design on Wellness: Theory and Recent Scientific Research.” Journal of Healthcare Design, 3, pp. 97～109.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.24 No.4

A Study on the Korean-American’s Sense of Place Type and Characteristic of NGO’s for North Korea Place-Based Psychological Approach

Abstract

Reference

Space and Environment