Space and Environment
- P-ISSN1225-6706
- E-ISSN2733-4295
- KCI
ISSN : 1225-6706
Browse Articles
- 2024 (Vol.34)
- 2023 (Vol.33)
- 2022 (Vol.32)
- 2021 (Vol.31)
- 2020 (Vol.30)
- 2019 (Vol.29)
- 2018 (Vol.28)
- 2017 (Vol.27)
- 2016 (Vol.26)
- 2015 (Vol.25)
- 2014 (Vol.24)
- 2013 (Vol.23)
- 2012 (Vol.22)
- 2011 (Vol.21)
- 2010 (No.33)
- 2009 (No.31)
- 2008 (No.29)
- 2007 (No.27)
- 2006 (No.26)
- 2005 (No.23)
- 2004 (No.21)
- 2003 (No.19)
- 2002 (No.17)
- 2001 (No.15)
- 2000 (Vol.13)
- 1999 (Vol.11)
- 1998 (Vol.10)
- 1997 (Vol.8)
- 1996 (Vol.7)
- 1995 (Vol.5)
- 1994 (Vol.4)
- 1993 (Vol.3)
- 1992 (Vol.2)
- 1991 (Vol.1)
Vol.25 No.3
Abstract
There have been many criticisms leveled against the rational planning model forvarious reasons. Developmental state theory, however, maintains to the concept of‘plan rational’ referring that coherent, internally consistent plans designed by elitebureaucrats were the key to developmental states’ success. This paper seeks to question existing accounts by tracing the planning of SouthKorea’s first comprehensive national physical development plan. It will focus onthe dynamic interactions between planning theories and sociopolitical realities withinthe Ministry of Construction(MOC), which was responsible for the plan’sdevelopment. MOC officials who were ignorant of planning theory had to learnmethods of planning to set up the large scale national plan and due to the lackof civilian experts, they became self-taught experts. While applying the theory intoan executable plan, however, they encountered various technical constraints and politicaldemands, which forced them to veer away from the original theoreticalframework. By examining the tinkering processes during the formation of national plan, thispaper reveals the plan’s rationality was a patchwork quilted with planning theoriesand sociopolitical contexts.
Abstract
This paper criticizes the formal-informal dichotomy in previous studies on streetvending in South Korea, and proposes the concept of urban informality which emphasizesthe dynamic interaction between formal and informal sectors. First, we arguethat street vending research in Korea needs to take into account that informalityis the result of dynamic interaction between different economies and spaces. Second,street vending should be understood in a concrete actor and space-oriented context. For policy makers, street vending is something to be ousted from the public space,whereas for researchers it is the necessary result of changes in the macroeconomicstructures which have excluded vendors from the formal sector. We focus on theproactive role of street vendors in creating a landscape through the dynamic interactionbetween various actors and institutions in a place. This perspective can leadto a change in the way urban planners and city government officials regard streetvendors as passive and marginal actors.
Abstract
최근 에너지 사용량 증가로 인하여 전력난이 심화되면서 중앙정부는 물론 지방정부에서도 신재생에너지에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 본 논문은 정부가 추진중인 신재생에너지 정책 가운데 폐기물 정책의 운영과정에서 나타나는 전반적인성과와 문제점을 밝혀내어 신재생에너지 정책의 개선방안을 제시하는 것이다. 이를 위해 폐기물 정책에 초점을 맞추고 연구방법은 전문가 심층면접 방법을 활용하였다. 전문가 심층면접 결과에서 폐기물 정책의 성과는 폐기물에 대한 인식개선, 폐기물의 감량화, 신재생에너지 생산, 지역의 일자리 창출 등으로 나타났다. 반면에 폐기물 정책의 문제점으로는 시민참여 부족과 입지과정에서의 갈등 발생,정부의 비일관적 에너지화 정책, 에너지 시장상황을 고려하지 않은 정책 추진, 신재생에너지 정책의 공동 합의기구가 구축되지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 폐기물 정책의 개선방안으로 지역특성을 고려한 입지결정과 자원순환시설의 클러스터화, 신재생에너지 정책 추진체계의 일원화를 통한 효율적 정책 추진, 에너지정책·신재생에너지 정책·폐자원에너지 정책의 연계, 신재생에너지 정책에 대한 공동 합의기구 설치 등을 제안하였다.
Abstract
The space where we live is constituted of multiple relationships between humanand non-human actors. Thus actor-network theory has much significance at twopoints: that is, this theory leads us to overcome various types of dualism, givingattention to networks or hybrid associations (i.e. assemblages) of human and non-humanactors; and it enables us to think about relational or topological concept ofspace with actor-networks. In particular, suggesting topological concept of space,actor-network theorists have tried to understand multiplicity of social spaces establishedwith actor-networks, considering, for example, 4 types of topology, that is,of region, network, fluidity and fire. Despite some worries about overproducing topologicalconcepts of space, we can elaborate further topological concept of space, byassociating ANT’s topological concept of space with that of other theorists (for example,Deleuze’s topology of rhizome, Agamben’s concept of ‘space of exception’,etc.). In conclusion, it can be argued that the significance of any topological conceptof space would depend on both to what extend it gives heuristic insights for empiricalanalysis, and how much it can pursue practices for forming and transforming ofactor-networks.