바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

한국 인문지리학의 ‘동물 전환’을 위하여 : 영미 동물지리학의 발전과 주요 쟁점

Animal Geographies for More-than-human Geographies in and of Korea

공간과 사회 / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2018, v.28 no.1, pp.16-54
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2018.28.1.16
최명애 (서울대학교 환경계획연구소)

Abstract

반려동물 사육 인구 천만 명을 넘어서면서, 최근 한국 사회에서 동물에 대한 대중적·정책적 관심이 빠른 속도로 높아지고 있다. 그러나 국내 인문지리학 연구에서 동물은 아직까지 본격적인 연구 대상으로 다뤄지지 못하고 있다. 이 같은 동물에 대한 ‘침묵’은 동물지리학이 인문지리학의 한 분야로 자리 잡은 영미 지리학계의 상황과 대조된다. 지난 20여 년간 동물지리학자들은 비인간 동물의 행위성(agency)과 인간-동물의 감응적(affective) 상호작용을 탐색함으로써 동물지리학을 인간 너머 지리학(more-than-human geography)의 이론적·경험적 프론티어로 발전시켜왔다. 특히 이들은 인간과 구별되는 동물의 차이를 존중하고, 이를 번성(flourishing) 케 할 것을 요구하는 혁신적 인간-동물 관계를 모색해 왔다. 이는 인간과 동물의유사성에 주목하고 동물 학대의 종식을 목표로 하는 현실 동물 해방 운동의 입장과 구분된다. 이 논문은 한국 인문지리학 연구의 지평을 인간-동물 관계로 확장하기 위한 탐색적 연구로, 영미 동물지리학의 연구 동향을 소개하고, 국내 동물지리학 연구가 개입할 수 있는 지점들을 검토해 보고자 한다. 먼저, 1990년대 중반 영미 인문지리학에서 출현한 ‘새로운’ 동물지리학의 발전 과정과 특징을 살펴본다. 이어 영미 동물지리학에서 발전시켜 온 주요 이론적 접근법(사회적 생산·구성주의적 접근, 관계적 접근, 생명정치적 접근)을 대표 연구 성과와 함께 소개한다. 마지막으로, 최근 영미 동물지리학 연구의 주요 쟁점 네 가지를 소개하고, 국내 동물지리학 연구가 개입하고 발전시킬 수 있는 지점들을 살펴본다.

keywords
animal geographies, more-than-human geography, biopolitics, nature-society relations, animal welfare, 동물지리학, 인간 너머의 지리학, 생명정치, 자연-사회 관계, 동물복지

참고문헌

1.

고든, 콜린(Colin Gordon) 외. 2014. 『푸코 효과: 통치성에 관한 연구』. 심성보•유진•이규원•이승철•전의령•최영찬 옮김. 난장.

2.

김동진. 2013. 「17세기 호속목제 시행의 생태경제사적 요인」. ≪역사와 현실≫, 90권, 29~70쪽.

3.

김명식. 2013. 「동물윤리와 환경윤리: 동물해방론과 생태중심주의 비교. ≪환경철학≫, 15권 0호, 1~30쪽.

4.

김민정. (2012). 「물질대사 균열 관점에서 본 인간과 자연간의 관계: 가축의 사육과질병에 대한 사례를 중심으로」. ≪사회과학연구≫, 20권 1호, 8~39쪽.

5.

김숙진. 2010. 「행위자-연결망 이론을 통한 과학과 자연의 재해석」. ≪대한지리학회지≫, 45권 4호, 461~477쪽.

6.

김숙진. 2016. 「아상블라주의 개념과 지리학적 함의」. ≪대한지리학회지≫, 51권 3호, 311~326쪽.

7.

김아름•이제민•장갑수. 2017. 「제주 노루(Capreolus pygargus)의 서식지 선호도 분석」. ≪한국지리정보학회지≫, 20권 4호, 139~151쪽.

8.

김환석. 2017. 「사회과학의 ‘물질적 전환(material turn)’을 위하여」. ≪경제와사회≫, 112권, 208~231쪽.

9.

매시, 도린(Doreen Massey). 2016. 『공간을 위하여』. 박경환•이영민•이용균 옮김. 심산.

10.

박준규•김민규. 2011. 「GIS에 의한 3차원 동물서식도 제작」. ≪한국지리정보학회지≫, 14권 4호, 54~62쪽.

11.

박창길. 2005. 「환경철학과 환경운동: 동물윤리와 한국의 동물보호법 개정」. ≪환경철학≫, 4권 0호, 29~73쪽.

12.

서소정. 2014. 「대한제국기 일제의 동물원 설립과 그 성격」. ≪한국근현대사연구≫, 68권, 7~42쪽.

13.

서울시•동물보호시민단체 카라. 2017. 『동물유기 및 야생화 예방을 위한 2차 시민토론회: 산에 사는 유기견(들개) 문제 어떻게 할 것인가 시민토론회 자료집』.

14.

싱어, 피터(Peter Singer). 2012. 『동물 해방』. 김성한 옮김. 연암서가.

15.

윤익준. 2016. 「동물의 지위에 대한 법정책적 담론: 현행법상 동물의 보호와 동물복지를 중심으로」. ≪법과 정책연구≫, 16권 1호, 37~65쪽.

16.

이용숙. 2017. 「가족으로서의 반려동물의 의미와 반려동물로 인한 구별 짓기」. ≪한국문화인류학≫, 50권 2호, 337~403쪽.

17.

이종찬. 2015. 「행위자-연결망 이론을 통해 본 길고양이 중성화 사업(TNR)과 공존의정치」. 서울대 환경대학원 환경계획학과 석사 학위 논문.

18.

장신옥. 2016. 「사회구성주의와 자연」. ≪환경사회학연구 ECO≫, 20권 2호, 133~163쪽.

19.

전의령. 2017. 「“길냥이를 부탁해”: 포스트휴먼 공동체의 생정치」. ≪한국문화인류학≫, 50권 3호, 3~40쪽.

20.

최명애. 2016. 「한국 생태관광에 대한 녹색통치성 연구를 위한 소고」. ≪공간과사회≫, 26권 4호(통권 58호), 229~266쪽.

21.

최병두. 2015. 「행위자-네트워크 이론과 위상학적 공간 개념」. ≪공간과사회≫, 25권3호(통권 53호), 126~173쪽.

22.

크레스웰, 팀(Tim Cresswell). 2015. 『지리사상사』. 박경환•류연택•심승희•정현주•서태동 옮김. 시그마프레스.

23.

Agamben, G. 2004. The open: Man and animal. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

24.

Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

25.

Anderson, B. 2009. “Affective atmospheres.” Emotion, Space and Society, 2(2), pp. 77~81.

26.

Anderson, K. 1995. “Culture and nature at the Adelaide Zoo: At the frontiers of ‘human’geography.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20(3), pp. 275~294.

27.

Asdal, K., T. Druglitrø. and S. Hinchliffe. 2016. Humans, animals and biopolitics: The more-than-human condition. London: Routledge.

28.

Barua, M. 2013. “Circulating elephants: Unpacking the geographies of a cosmopolitan animal.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(4), pp. 559~573.

29.

Barua, M. 2016. “Lively commodities and encounter value.” Environment and Planning D:Society and Space, 34(4), pp. 725~744.

30.

Bear, C. and S. Eden. 2011. “Thinking like a fish? Engaging with nonhuman difference through recreational angling.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(2), pp. 336~352.

31.

Beardsworth, A. and A. Bryman. 2001. “The wild animal in late modernity: The case of the Disneyization of zoos.” Tourist Studies, 1(1), pp. 83~104.

32.

Bekoff, M. 2002. Minding animals: Awareness, emotions, and heart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

33.

Best, S. 2009. “The rise of critical animal studies: Putting theory into action and animal liberation into higher education.” Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 7(1), pp. 9~52.

34.

Bingham, N. 2006. “Bees, butterflies, and bacteria: Biotechnology and the politics of nonhuman friendship.” Environment and Planning A, 38(3), pp. 483~498.

35.

Braun, B. 2005. “Environmental issues: Writing a more-than-human urban geography.”Progress in Human Geography, 29(5), pp. 635~650.

36.

Buller, H. 2008. “Safe from the wolf: Biosecurity, biodiversity, and competing philosophies of nature.” Environment and Planning A, 40(7), pp. 1583~1597.

37.

Buller, H. 2013a. “Animal geographies I.” Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), pp. 308~318.

38.

Buller, H. 2013b. “Individuation, the mass and farm animals.” Theory, Culture & Society, 30(7-8), pp. 155~175.

39.

Buller, H. 2015. “Animal geographies II: Methods.” Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), pp. 374~384.

40.

Buller, H. 2016a. “Animal geographies.” International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment and technology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

41.

Buller, H. 2016b. “Animal geographies III: Ethics.” Progress in Human Geography, 40(3), pp. 422~430.

42.

Calarco, M. 2008. Zoographies: The question of the animal from Heidegger to Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.

43.

Candea, M. 2010. ““I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat”: Engagement and detachment in human-animal relations.” American Ethnologist, 37(2), pp. 241~258.

44.

Castree, N. 2008a. “Neoliberalising nature: processes, effects, and evaluations.” Environment and Planning A, 40(1), pp. 153~173.

45.

Castree, N. 2008b. “Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation.”Environment and Planning A, 40(1), pp. 131~152.

46.

Castree, N. and B. Braun. 2001. Social nature: Theory, practice, and politics. Oxford:Blackwell Publishers.

47.

Chang, K. S. 2010. South Korea under compressed modernity: Familial political economy in transition. Abingdon: Routledge.

48.

Choi, M. A. 2016a. “More-than-human geographies of nature: Toward a careful political ecology.” Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 51(5), pp. 613~632.

49.

Choi, M. A. 2016b. Governing deceleration: The natures, times, and spaces of ecotourism in South Korea. PhD thesis, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford.

50.

Choi, M. A. 2017. “The whale multiple: Spatial formations of whale tourism in Jangsaengpo, South Korea.” Environment and Planning A, 49(11), pp. 2536~2557.

51.

Christophers, B. 2006. “Visions of nature, spaces of empire: Framing natural history programming within geometries of power.” Geoforum, 37(6), pp. 973~985.

52.

Cloke, P. and H. C. Perkins. 2005. “Cetacean performance and tourism in Kaikoura, New Zealand.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23(6), pp. 903~924.

53.

Collard, R. C. 2013. “Putting animals back together, taking commodities apart.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(1), pp. 151~165.

54.

Collard, R. C. and J. Dempsey. 2013. “Life for sale? The politics of lively commodities.”Environment and Planning A, 45(11), pp. 2682~2699.

55.

Davies, G. 2000a. “Narrating the natural history unit: Institutional orderings and spatial strategies.” Geoforum, 31(4), pp. 539~551.

56.

Davies, G. 2000b. “Virtual animals in electronic zoos.” In: C. Philo and C. Wilbert(eds.). Animal spaces, beastly places: New geographies of human-animal relations. London:Routledge, pp. 243~266.

57.

Davies, G. 2012. “Caring for the multiple and the multitude: Assembling animal welfare and enabling ethical critique.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(4), pp. 623~638.

58.

Davies, G. 2014. “Searching for GloFish®: Aesthetics, ethics, and encounters with the neon baroque.” Environment and Planning A, 46(11), pp. 2604~2621.

59.

Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society(2nd edn). London: Sage.

60.

Derrida, J. 2008. The animal that therefore I am. New York: Fordham University Press.

61.

Duffy, R. 2014. “Interactive elephants: Nature, tourism and neoliberalism.” Annals of Tourism Research, 44, pp. 88~101.

62.

Duffy, R. and L. Moore. 2010. “Neoliberalising nature? Elephant-back tourism in Thailand and Botswana.” Antipode, 42(3), pp. 742~766.

63.

Emel, J. 1998. “Are you man enough, big and bad enough? Wolf eradication in the US.” In: J. R. Wolch and J. Emel(eds.). Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. New York: Verso. pp. 91~118.

64.

Emel, J., C. Wilbert. and J. Wolch. 2003. “Reanimating cultural geography.” In: K. Anderson(ed.). Handbook of cultural geography. London: Sage, pp. 184~206.

65.

Foucault, M. 1978. The history of sexuality, volume I. New York: Vintage.

66.

Foucault, M. 2009. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France. Basingtoke:Palgrave Macmillan.

67.

Gillespie, K. and R. C. Collard. 2015. Critical animal geographies: Politics, intersections and hierarchies in a multispecies world. New York: Taylor & Francis.

68.

Ginn, F. 2014. “Sticky lives: Slugs, detachment and more-than-human ethics in the garden.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(4), pp. 532~544.

69.

Greenhough, B. 2012. “Where species meet and mingle: Endemic human-virus relations, embodied communication and more-than-human agency at the Common Cold Unit 1946-90.” Cultural Geographies, 19(3), pp. 281~301.

70.

Greenhough, B. and E. J. Roe. 2011. “Ethics, space, and somatic sensibilities: Comparing relationships between scientific researchers and their human and animal experimental subjects.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(1), pp. 47~66.

71.

Hannah, M. G. 2011. “Biopower, life and left politics.” Antipode, 43(4), pp. 1034~1055.

72.

Haraway, D. 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

73.

Hinchliffe, S. 2007. Geographies of nature: Societies, environments, ecologies. London: Sage.

74.

Hinchliffe, S. and N. Bingham. 2008. “Securing life: The emerging practices of biosecurity.” Environment and Planning A, 40(7), pp. 1534~1551.

75.

Hinchliffe, S., M. B. Kearnes., M. Degen. and S. Whatmore. 2005. “Urban wild things:A cosmopolitical experiment.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23(5), pp. 643~658.

76.

Hinchliffe, S. and S. Whatmore. 2006. “Living cities: Towards a politics of conviviality.”Science as Culture, 15(2), pp. 123~138.

77.

Hobson, K. 2007. “Political animals? On animals as subjects in an enlarged political geography.” Political Geography, 26(3), pp. 250~267.

78.

Hodgetts, T. 2016. “Wildlife conservation, multiple biopolitics and animal subjectification:Three mammals’ tales.” Geoforum, 79, pp. 17~25.

79.

Hodgetts, T. and J. Lorimer. 2015. “Methodologies for animals’ geographies: Cultures, communication and genomics.” Cultural Geographies, 22(2), pp. 285~295.

80.

Holloway, L., C. Morris., B. Gilna. and D. Gibbs. 2009. “Biopower, genetics and livestock breeding: (Re)constituting animal populations and heterogeneous biosocial collectivities.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34(3), pp. 394~407.

81.

Hovorka, A. 2008. “Transspecies urban theory: Chickens in an African city.” Cultural Geographies, 15(1), pp. 95~117.

82.

Kirksey, E. 2014. The Multispecies salon. Durham: Duke University Press.

83.

Kirksey, S. and S. Helmreich. 2010. “The emergence of multispecies ethnography.”Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), pp. 545~576.

84.

Ko, Y. -F. 2003. “Consuming differences: ‘Hello Kitty’ and the identity crisis in Taiwan.”Postcolonial Studies: Culture, Politics, Economy, 6(2), pp. 175~189.

85.

Laurier, E. 2014. “Dissolving the dog: the home made video.” Cultural Geographies, 21(4), pp. 627~638.

86.

Latour, B. 2004. Politics of nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

87.

Lemke, T. 2011. Biopolitics: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.

88.

Lorimer, H. 2006. “Herding memories of humans and animals.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(4), pp. 497~518.

89.

Lorimer, J. 2007. “Nonhuman charisma.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(5), pp. 911~932.

90.

Lorimer, J. 2008. “Counting corncrakes: The affective science of the UK corncrake census.”Social Studies of Science, 38(3), pp. 377~405.

91.

Lorimer, J. 2010a. “Elephants as companion species: The lively biogeographies of Asian elephant conservation in Sri Lanka.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(4), pp. 491~506.

92.

Lorimer, J. 2010b. “Moving image methodologies for more-than-human geographies.”Cultural Geographies, 17(2), pp. 237~258.

93.

Lorimer, J. 2012. “Multinatural geographies for the Anthropocene.” Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), pp. 593~612.

94.

Lorimer, J. 2015. Wildlife in the Anthropocean: Conservation after nature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

95.

Lorimer, J. 2017. “Parasites, ghosts and mutualists: A relational geography of microbes for global health.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(4), pp. 544~558.

96.

Lorimer, J. and C. Driessen. 2013. “Bovine biopolitics and the promise of monsters in the rewilding of Heck cattle.” Geoforum, 48, pp. 249~259.

97.

Lorimer, J. and T. Hodgetts. 2016. “Biogeography.” International encyclopedia of geography:People, the earth, environment and technology, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

98.

Lorimer, J. and K. Srinivasan. 2013. “Animal geographies.” In: N. Johnson, R. Schein and J. Winders(eds.). The Wiley-Blackwell companion to cultural geography. Oxford: Wiley. pp. 332~342.

99.

Lorimer, J. and S. Whatmore. 2009. “After the ‘king of beasts’: Samuel Baker and the embodied historical geographies of elephant hunting in mid-nineteenth-century Ceylon.” Journal of Historical Geography, 35(4), pp. 668~689.

100.

Luke, T. 1999. “Environmentality as green governmentality.” In: É. Darier(ed.). Discourses of the environment. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 121~151.

101.

Lulka, D. 2004. “Stabilizing the herd: Fixing the identity of nonhumans.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(3), pp. 439~463.

102.

Mansfield, B. 2003. “From catfish to organic fish: Making distinctions about nature as cultural economic practice.” Geoforum, 34(3), pp. 329~342.

103.

Mansfield, B. 2006. “Assessing market-based environmental policy using a case study of North Pacific fisheries.” Global Environmental Change, 16(1), pp. 29~39.

104.

Massey, D. B. 1994. “A global sense of place.” Space, place, and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press. pp. 146~156.

105.

McVeigh, B. J. 2000. “How Hello Kitty commodifies the cute, cool and camp:‘Consumutopia’ versus ‘Control’ in Japan.” Journal of Material Culture, 5(2), pp. 225~245.

106.

Nam, J. Y. 2014. Free Jedol: The biopolitics of captive dolphin release in South Korea. MSc dissertation, School of Geographical Science, University of Bristol.

107.

Neves, K. 2010. “Cashing in on cetourism: A critical ecological engagement with dominant e-NGO discourses on whaling, cetacean conservation, and whale watching.”Antipode, 42(3), pp. 719~741.

108.

Philo, C. and C. Wilbert. 2000a. Animal spaces, beastly places: New geographies of human-animal relations. Oxford; New York: Routledge.

109.

Philo, C. and C. Wilbert. 2000b. “Introduction.” In: C. Philo and C. Wilbert(eds.). Animal spaces, beastly places: New geographies of human-animal relations. Oxford; New York: Routledge. pp. 1~36.

110.

Philo, C. and J. Wolch. 1998. “Through the geographical looking glass: Space, place, and society-animal relations.” Society and Animals, 6(2), pp. 103~118.

111.

Rabinow, P. and N. Rose. 2006. “Biopower today.” BioSocieties, 1(2), pp. 195~217.

112.

Rajan, K. S. 2006. Biocapital: The constitution of postgenomic life. Durham: Duke University Press.

113.

Regan, T. 2004. The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

114.

Rose, N. 2007. The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

115.

Rutherford, P. and S. Rutherford. 2013a. “The confusions and exuberances of biopolitics.”Geography Compass, 7(6), pp. 412~422.

116.

Rutherford, S. and P. Rutherford. 2013b. “Geography and biopolitics.” Geography Compass, 7(6), pp. 423~434.

117.

Rutherford, S. 2007. “Green governmentality: Insights and opportunities in the study of nature’s rule.” Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), pp. 291~307.

118.

Rutherford, S. 2011. Governing the wild: Ecotours of power. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

119.

Rutherford, S. 2013. “The biopolitical animal in Canadian and environmental studies.” Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue Détudes Canadiennes, 47(3), pp. 123~144.

120.

Shukin, N. 2009. Animal capital: Rendering life in biopolitical times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

121.

Srinivasan, K. 2013. “The biopolitics of animal being and welfare: Dog control and care in the UK and India.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), pp. 106~119.

122.

Stengers, I., B. Braun. and S. J. Whatmore. 2010. “Including nonhumans in political theory: Opening the Pandora’s Box?” In: B. Braun and S. Whatmore(eds.). Political matter: Technoscience, democracy, and public life, Minneapolis: University of Minesota Press, pp. 3~33.

123.

Tatar, B. 2017. “Place-making, landscape and materialities: whales and social practices in Ulsan, Korea.” Korean Cultural Anthropology, 50(2), pp. 405~446.

124.

Thrift, N. 2007. Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Abingdon: Routledge.

125.

Twine, R. 2010. Animals as biotechnology: Ethics, sustainability and critical animal studies. London: Routledge.

126.

Urbanik, J. 2012. Placing animals: An introduction to the geography of human-animal relations. Lanham; Rowman & Littlefield.

127.

Urbanik, J. and M. Morgan. 2013. “A tale of tails: The place of dog parks in the urban imaginary.” Geoforum, 44, pp. 292~302.

128.

Van Dooren, T. 2014. Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York:Columbia University Press.

129.

Vannini, P. 2015. Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research. London:Routledge.

130.

Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. London: Sage.

131.

Whatmore, S. 2006. “Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world.” Cultural Geographies, 13(4), pp. 600~609.

132.

Whatmore, S. and L. Thorne. 1998. “Wild(er)ness: Reconfiguring the geographies of wildlife.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 23(4), pp. 435~454.

133.

Wheeler, W. and L. Williams. 2012. “The animals turn.” New Formations, 76, pp. 5~7.

134.

Wolch, J. and J. Emel. 1995. “Bringing the animals back in.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13(6), pp. 632~636.

135.

Wolch, J. R. 1998. “Zoopolis.” In: J. R. Wolch and J. Emel(eds.). Animal geographies:Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. New York: Verso. pp. 119~138.

136.

Wolch, J. R. and J. Emel. 1998. Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. New York: Verso.

137.

남종영. 2017.7.3. “ ‘북한산 들개’의 탄생 … 개들은 왜 산으로 갔을까”. ≪한겨레≫.

138.

신호경. 2017.2.19. “한국인 5명 중 1명 반려동물 기른다 … 문화와 산업 됐다”. ≪연합뉴스≫.

139.

최우리. 2017.4.17. “반려동물 인구 1천만 시대 … 대선공약 오른 동물복지”. ≪한겨레≫.

공간과 사회