Civic Engagement and Place Attachment of Immigrants in an Ethnic Cluster: Daerim-dong as a Case Study

신지연; 박인권

doi:10.19097/kaser.2021.31.1.168

Space and Environment

P-ISSN1225-6706
E-ISSN2733-4295
KCI

Home

ISSN : 1225-6706

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.31 No.1

Citation Share

Civic Engagement and Place Attachment of Immigrants in an Ethnic Cluster: Daerim-dong as a Case Study

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295

2021, v.31 no.1, pp.168-207

https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2021.31.1.168

& (2021). Civic Engagement and Place Attachment of Immigrants in an Ethnic Cluster: Daerim-dong as a Case Study. Space and Environment, 31(1), 168-207, https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2021.31.1.168

copy

Abstract

This study aims to identify the factors and effects of civic engagement in improving the community in an ethnic cluster, and its relationship with place attachment by applying a grounded theory method to the experiences of volunteers of the Daerim-dong Foreigners’ Voluntary Crime Prevention Patrol (FVCPP) in Seoul. The results show both the specificity of immigrants as well as the generality. First, in addition to general factors such as positive perception of the ethnic cluster and personal characteristics, in the case of immigrants, special factors such as their adaptation to local society and awareness of the ethnic community act as causal conditions for place attachment and civic engagement. In addition, negative local public opinion on immigrants and the cluster motivates them to volunteer in the community, and their social ties connect them to engage. Immigrant civic engagement drives personal, social, and environmental development, as well as the development of the civic activity itself, which in turn reinforces place attachment. From this, we can derive the conditions in which immigrants’ local adaptation, place attachment, civic engagement, and community improvement can make synergistic effects with each other.

keywords: Ethnic cluster, Civic engagement, Immigrant, Place attachment, Volunteer, Grounded theory, Daerim-dong, 외국인 밀집지, 시민행동, 이주자, 장소애착심, 지역봉사, 근거이론, 대림동

Reference

고민경. 2019. ｢결혼이주여성의 가정 너머 불안정성 : (잠재적) 다문화강사의 가 정 너머 불안정성의 생산 사례를 중심으로｣. ≪공간과 사회≫, 68, 63~95쪽.

김은재. 2018. ｢여성 결혼이민자들의 지역사회 자원 봉사활동 참여 경험에 대한 현상학적 연구｣. ≪한국지역사회학회≫, 26(4), 65~90쪽.

김현선. 2010. ｢한국 체류 조선족의 밀집거주지역과 정주의식: 서울시 구로·영등포구를 중심으로｣. ≪사회와 역사≫, 87, 231~264쪽.

남성진·최정호·이재모. 2011. ｢근거이론을 통한 지역사회복지사업의 주민참여에 관한 연구｣. ≪한국지역사회복지학≫, 39, 101~128쪽.

문경연 . 2019. ｢대만에서 ‘시민 되기’: 중국 출신 결혼이주자의 조직화｣. ≪다문화사회연구≫, 12(3), 73~106쪽.

박세훈·이영아·김은란·정소양. 2009. ｢다문화사회에 대응하는 도시정책 연구(I): 외국인 밀집지역의 현황과 정책과제｣. 국토연구원.

박세훈. 2010. ｢한국의 외국인 밀집지역 : 역사적 형성과정과 사회공간적 변화｣. ≪도시행정학보≫, 23, 69~100쪽.

박세훈. 2011. ｢한국 지방자치단체 외국인정책의 비판적 성찰 : ‘다문화 도시정책’의 제언｣. ≪공간과 사회≫, 36, 5~34쪽.

박윤환. 2011. ｢빈곤층과 외국인 주민 거주지분리에 대한 연구: 서울시 사례연구｣. ≪서울도시연구≫, 12(4), 103~122쪽.

10.

서지수. 2012. ｢서울 대림동의 조선족 “통로(Portal)” 로서 장소성 형성｣. ≪지리학논총≫, 49~75쪽.

11.

양한순. 2015. ｢다문화주의 시대 귀환 중국동포의 문화적 시민권｣. ≪동북아 문화연구≫, 45, 231~254쪽.

12.

이자은. 2019. ｢근거이론 연구방법을 통한 주민들의 참여인식 및 행태변화 분석: 장위동 도시재생사업 참여주민을 대상으로｣. ≪국토계획≫, 54(7), 24~41쪽.

13.

이춘호. 2014. ｢재한 중국 동포의 정체성의 정치｣. ≪아태연구≫ 21(3), 143~180쪽.

14.

이화용·이영민. 2018. ｢중국국적 이주자 밀집지역 내 경계와 질서의 재구성｣. ≪로컬리티 인문학≫, 20, 7~41쪽.

15.

홍우영·정석. 2018. ｢근거이론을 활용한 재건축사업 정비구역 내 주민의 찬반 입장변화과정분석｣. ≪서울도시연구≫, 19(1), 41~62쪽.

16.

Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. 2005. “What Do We Mean By “Civic Engagement?”” Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), pp.236~253.

17.

Anderson, J. C., & Moore, L. F. 1978. “The Motivation to Volunteer.” Journal of Voluntary Action Research. pp.120~129.

18.

Anton, C. E., & Lawrence, C. 2014. “Home is Where the Heart is: The Effect of Place of Residence on Place Attachment and Community Participation.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, pp.451~461.

19.

Berry, J. W. 1997. “Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation.” Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), pp.5~34.

20.

Berry, J. W., & Hou, F. 2017.“ Acculturation, Discrimination and Wellbeing Among Second Generation of Immigrants in Canada.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 61, pp.29~39.

21.

Boğaç, C. 2009. “Place Attachment in a Foreign Settlement.“ Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), pp.267~278.

22.

Bonaiuto, M., Aiello, A., Perugini, M., Bonnes, M., & Ercolani, A. P. 1999. “Multidimensional Perception of Residential Environment.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, pp.331~352.

23.

Brown, B. B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. 2004. “Incivilities, Place Attachment and Crime:Block and Individual Eeffects.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), pp.359~371.

24.

Brown, B., & Perkins, D. D. 1992. “Disruptions in Place Attachment.” Place Attachment

25.

Burchfield, K. B. 2009. “Attachment as a Source of Informal Social Control in Urban Neighborhoods.” Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(1), pp.45~54.

26.

Chang, T. C. 2000. “Singapore’s Little India: A Tourist Attraction as a Contested Landscape.” Urban Studies, 37(2), pp.343~366.

27.

Clary, E., Snyder, M., & Stukas, A. A. 1996. “Volunteer Motivations: Findings from a National Survey.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(4), pp.485~505.

28.

D. R. Williams, & J. J. Vaske. 2003. “The Measurement of Place Attachment: Validity and Generalizability of a Psychometric Approach.” Forest Science, 49(6), pp.830~840.

29.

Da Silva, L., Sanson, A., Smart, D., & Toumbourou, J. 2004. “Civic Responsibility Among Australian Adolescents: Testing Two Competing Models.” Journal of Community Psychology, 32(3), pp.229~255.

30.

Devine-Wright, P., Price, J., & Leviston, Z. 2015. “My Country or My Planet? Exploring the Influence of Multiple Place Attachments and Ideological Beliefs Upon Climate Change Attitudes and Opinions.” Global Environmental Change, 30, pp.68~79.

31.

Dipasquale, D., & Glaeser, E. L. 1999. “Incentives and Social Capital: Are Homeowners Better Citizens?” Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), pp.354~384.

32.

Estrella, M. L., & Kelley, M. A. 2017. “Exploring the Meanings of Place Attachment Among Civically Engaged Puerto Rican Youth.” Journal of Community Practice, 25(3–4), pp.408~431.

33.

Flanagan, C. A., Bowes, J. M., Jonsson, B., Csapo, B., & Sheblanova, E. 2020. “Ties That Bind: Correlates of Adolescents’ Civic Commitments in Seven Countries.”Experiencing Social Research: A Reader, 54(3), pp.303~322.

34.

Fried, M. 2000. “Continuities and Discontinuities of Place.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), pp.193~205.

35.

George C. Galster, & Hesser, G. W. 1982. “The Social Neighborhood: An Unspecified Factor in Homeowner Maintenance.” Urban Affairs Quarterly, 188(2), pp.235~254.

36.

Gidwani, V., & Baviskar, A. 2011. “Urban Commons.” Economic and Political Weekly, 46(50), pp.42~43.

37.

Gold, S. J. 1992. “Refugee Communities: A Comparative Field Study. Newbury Park.” CA:Sage.

38.

Goudy, W. J. 1982. “Further Consideration of Indicators of Community Attachment.”Social Indicators Research, 11(2), pp.181~192.

39.

Huang, X., Shi, Z., Li, Z., Liu, Y., & Xue, D. 2018. “The Effects of Social Ties on Rural-Urban Migrants’ Intention to Settle in Cities in China.” Cities, 83, pp.203~212.

40.

Irwin Altman, S. M. L. 1992. “Place Attachment.” New York and London: Plenum Press.

41.

Kals, E., & Maes, J. 2002. “Psychology of Sustainable Development.” (Peter Schmuck & W. P. Schultz, Eds.). Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

42.

Kanakis, K., McShane, C. J., Kilcullen, M. L., & Swinbourne, A. L. 2019. “It’s the People that Keep Me Here: Exploring the Role of Community Attachment in Increasing Length of Residency.” Journal of Rural Studies, 70, pp.19~25.

43.

Kaplan, D. H., & Recoquillon, C. 2014. “Ethnic Place Identity Within a Parisian Neighborhood.” Geographical Review, 104(1), 33~51.

44.

Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R. 2005. “Testing the Dimensionality of Place Attachment in Recreational Settings.” Environment and Behavior, 37(2), 153~177.

45.

Lalli, M. 1992. “Urban-related identity: Theory, Measurement, and Empirical Findings.”Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(4), pp.285~303.

46.

Lapierre, Y. Q., & Sinha, A. 1993. “Chinese Students’ Perceptions of Home and Community in the United States. A Case Study at University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.” Habitat International, 17(2), pp.123~134.

47.

Lewicka, M. 2005. “Ways to Make People Active: The Role of Place Attachment, Cultural Capital, and Neighborhood Ties.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), pp.381~395.

48.

Lewicka, M. 2010. “What Makes a Neighborhood Different from Home and City? Effects of Place Scale on Place Attachment.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), pp.35~51.

49.

Low, S. M., & Altman, I. 1992. “Place attachment: A Conceptual Inquiry,” in Place Attachment, I. Altman and S. W. Low(eds). New York, NY: Plenum, pp.1~12.

50.

Mazumdar, S., Mazumdar, S., Docuyanan, F., & McLaughlin, C. M. 2000. “Creating a Sense of Place: The Vietnamese-Americans and Little Saigon.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(4), pp.319~333.

51.

Michels, A. 2011. “Innovations in Democratic Governance: How Does Citizen Participation Contribute to a Better Democracy?” International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), pp.275~293.

52.

Palmer, N. A., Perkins, D. D., & Xu, Q. 2011. “Social Capital and Community Participation Among Migrant Workers in China.” Journal of Community Psychology, 39(1), pp.89~105.

53.

Payton, M. A., Fulton, D. C., & Anderson, D. H. 2005. “Influence of Place Attachment and Trust on Civic Action: A Study at Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge.” Society and Natural Resources, 18(6), pp.511~528.

54.

Prezza, M., Amici, M., Roberti, T., & Tedeschi, G. 2001. “Sense of Community Referred to the Whole Town: Its Relations with Neighboring, Loneliness, Life Satisfactions, and Area of Residence.” Journal of Community Psychology, 29(1), pp.29~52.

55.

Proshansky, H. M. 1978. “The City and Self-identity.” Environment and Behavior, 10(2), pp.147~169.

56.

Putnam, R. 1993. "The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life.” The American Prospect, 4(13), pp.35~42.

57.

Rochelle, T. L., & Shardlow, S. M. 2012. “Involvement in Volunteer Work and Social Participation among UK Chinese.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(5), pp.728~736.

58.

Sampson, R., & Gifford, S. M. 2010. “Place-making, Settlement and Well-being: The Therapeutic Landscapes of Recently Arrived Youth with Refugee Backgrounds.”Health and Place, 16(1), pp.116~131.

59.

Sheng, M., Gu, C., & Wu, W. 2019. “To Move or to Stay in a Migrant Enclave in Beijing:The Role of Neighborhood Social Bonds.” Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(3), pp.338~353.

60.

Shye, S. 2010. “The Motivation to Volunteer: A Systemic Quality of Life Theory.” Social Indicators Research, 98(2), pp.183~200.

61.

Song, Z., & Soopramanien, D. 2019. “Types of Place Attachment and Pro-environmental Behaviors of Urban Residents in Beijing.” Cities, 84, pp.112~120.

62.

Stedman, R. C. 2003. Toward a Social Psychology of Place. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), pp.561~581.

63.

Stokols, N., & Shumaker, S. 1981. People in Places: A Transactional View of Settings. Harvey(Ed). NJ: Hillsdale Erlbaum.

64.

Strauss A., Corbin J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications. CA. pp.1~170.

65.

Toomey, A. H., Strehlau-Howay, L., Manzolillo, B., & Thomas, C. 2020. “The Placemaking Potential of Citizen Science: Creating Social-ecological Connections in an Urbanized World.” Landscape and Urban Planning Journal, 200.

66.

Trueman, M., Cook, D. & Cornelius, N. 2008. “Creative Dimensions for Branding and Regeneration: Overcoming Negative Perceptions of a City.” Place Brand Public Diplomacy, 4, pp.29~44.

67.

Vaske, J. J., & Kobrin, K. C. 2009. “Place Attachment and Environmentally Responsible Behavior.” The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), pp.16~21.

68.

Vollstedt, M., & Rezat, S. 2019. An Introduction to Grounded Theory with a Special Focus on Axial Coding and the Coding Paradigm. Springer International Publishing.

69.

Wu, R., Li, Z., Liu, Y., Huang, X., & Liu, Y. 2019. “Neighborhood Governance in Post-reform Urban China: Place Attachment Impact on Civic Engagement in Guangzhou.” Land Use Policy, 81, pp.472~482.

70.

Zenker, S., & Rütter, N. 2014. “Is Satisfaction the Key? The Role of Citizen Satisfaction, Place Attachment and Place Brand Attitude on Positive Citizenship Behavior.”Cities, 38, pp.11~17.

71.

법무부. 2018. ｢제3차 외국인정책기본계획(2018년 ~ 2022년)｣.

72.

서울특별시 여성가족정책실. 2019. ｢제2차 외국인 정책 및 다문화가족 정책 기본계획 세부단위사업 추진계획('19~23년)｣.

73.

서울특별시 여성가족정책실. 2019.｢제2차(2019~2023) 서울시 외국인주민 및 다문화 가족 정책 기본계획｣.

74.

임기창. 2019. “외국인 밀집지역을 안전하게”…경찰, 범죄 예방 환경 조성 추진. ≪연합뉴스≫https://www.yna.co.krviewAKR20190316045100004(검색일: 2020.05.20).

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.31 No.1

Civic Engagement and Place Attachment of Immigrants in an Ethnic Cluster: Daerim-dong as a Case Study

Abstract

Reference

Space and Environment