바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Asian Body in Heavy Industiral Era

Feminism and Korean Literature / Feminism and Korean Literature, (P)1229-4632; (E)2733-5925
2013, v.0 no.30, pp.153-189
Youngjae Yi

Abstract

Hong Kong Cinema was imported to South Korea from 1967. Ever since King Hu’s Come Drink With Me attained an unexpected success in 1967, Hong Kong action films had achieved a continuous box office hit in Korean film market. In particular, these films targeted a certain stratum of urban lower-class males in the Korean film environment in the 1970s that was about to be divided into classes, genders, and generations. In the 1970s, the Korean film field encountered a rapid industrial recession and the government’s excessive regulation, thus relying itself on the combination with this stable product of Hong Kong action films. Camouflage Collaboration, which became problematic all the 1970s, was the consequence of the Korean film market’s demand. This paper examines the definition of national cinema or the situation that already exceeds the boundary of national cinema, focusing on the imported Hong Kong cinema, its camouflage collaboration, and Korean - or, already beyond this national boundary - formula films that were made in the world wide Bruce Lee boom from 1973. In the meantime, I determine that the characters’ trained corporeal representations in the films are associated with industrialization,particularly with heavy industry. That is, these Hong Kong martial arts films or their related formula films in the 1970s do not only reveal the unconsciousness of preferable body for heavy chemical industry, but also presents another unconscious crisis and resistance to physical limitation.

keywords
액션영화, 홍콩영화, 위장합작, 중공업, 전지구적 자본주의, 내셔널 시네마, 이소룡, Hong Kong Cinema, classes, national cinema, industrialization, martial arts film, camouflage collaboration, body

Reference

1.

권용순 채록연구, 2010년 한국영화사 구출채록연구 시리즈 「생애사」 김성근 , 한국영상자료원, 2010, 193쪽.

2.

김 원, 여공 1970 , 이매진, 2006, 597쪽.

3.

김태정 인터뷰, 무비스트 , 2009.6.

4.

안태근, 「韓國 合作映畵 硏究 : 위장합작영화를 중심으로」, 한국외대 박사학위논문, 2012.

5.

영화진흥공사, 1977년 영화연감 , 영화진흥공사, 1978.

6.

영화진흥공사, 1978년도판 한국영화연감 , 영화진흥공사, 1979.

7.

이길성, 「1960, 70년대 상영관의 변화와 관객문화」, 한국영화사 공부 1960-1979 , 한국영상자료원, 2004, 224쪽.

8.

이길성․이호걸․이우석, 1970년대 서울의 극장산업 및 극장문화 연구 , 영화진흥위원회, 2004, 78∼89쪽.

9.

이상철, 「박정희 시대의 산업정책」, 이병천 엮음, 개발독재와 박정희 시대 , 창비, 2003.

10.

이승희, 「조선극장의 스캔들과 극장의 정치경제학」, 대동문화연구 72집, 2010, 117∼158쪽.

11.

정대훈, 「대일청구권자금의 도입과 포항제철의 건설」, 한양대 석사학위논문, 2011.

12.

조선작, 「지사총」, 성벽 , 瑞音出版社, 1976, 292쪽.

13.

천명관, 나의 삼촌 브루스 리 , 예담, 2012

14.

크리스 베리, 「스타의 횡단: 초국적 프레임에서 본 이소룡의 몸 혹은 중화주의적 남성성」(김은주 역), 김소영 편, 트랜스: 아시아 영상문화 , 현실문화연구, 2006, 368쪽.

15.

한국영상자료원 엮음, 「이경희」, 한국영화를 말한다: 한국영화의 르네상스 1 , 이채, 2005, 256쪽.

16.

한석정, 「박정희, 또는 만주국판 하이모더니즘의 확산」, 일본비평 3호, 2010.

17.

Chan, Jachinson, Chinese American Masculinities: From Fu Manchu to Bruce Lee, Routledge, 2001, p.89.

18.

Chang, Cheh, Chang Cheh: A Memoir, Hong Kong Film Archive, 2004, p. 138.

19.

Desser, David, Hong Kong Film and the New Cinephilia, edited by Meaghan Morris , Siu Leung Li , Stephen Chan Ching-Kiu, Hong Kong Connections: Transnational Imagination in Action Cinema, Duke University Press, 2006, p.218

20.

Fu, Poshek, “The Shaw Brothers Diasporic Cinema”, China Forever, edited by Poshek Fu, University of Illinois, 2008, pp.2∼10.

21.

Ma, Teresa, “Chronicles of Change:1960s-1980s”, Changes in Hong Kong Society Through Cinema, Hong Kong Urban Council, 1988.

22.

Morris, Meagan, “Transnational Imagination in Action Cinema: Hong Kong and the Making of a Global Popular Culture”, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 5:2, Routledge, 2004, pp.181∼199.

23.

Scott, James, Seeing Like a State: How Certatin Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed New Haven, Yale University Press, 1999, pp.97∼90.

24.

Teo, Stephen, Hong Kong Cinema: The Extra Dimensions, British Film Institute, 1997.

25.

Willimen, Paul, “Action Cinema, Labour Power and the Video Market”, edited by Meaghan Morris , Siu Leung Li , Stephen Chan Ching-Kiu, Hong Kong Connections: Transnational Imagination in Action Cinema, Duke University Press, 2006.

26.

경향신문

27.

대한신문

28.

동아일보

29.

한겨레

30.

여원

31.

서울육백년사 http://seoul600.seoul.go.kr/seoul-history/sidaesa/txt/8-4-1-2-2.html

Feminism and Korean Literature