바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1229-4632

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

No.36

Citation Share

On the Enclosure of the Affect: - How to Speculate on the Disgust in the Era of Neo-liberalism

Feminism and Korean Literature / Feminism and Korean Literature, (P)1229-4632; (E)2733-5925
2015, v.0 no.36, pp.117-141
Hee-jeong Sohn
Hee-jeong, S. (2015). On the Enclosure of the Affect: - How to Speculate on the Disgust in the Era of Neo-liberalism. Feminism and Korean Literature, (36), 117-141.

Abstract

This is the era of affects management in accordance with the needs of the capital and the state. To this end, affects have been treated and discussed as distinguishable from each other. Such epistemology has been formed in a “steady projects that assume the relationship between the mind and the world can be explored mathematically,” which is connected to the 'happiness industry' excessively pathologizing depression and worshipping happiness as the most powerful ideology in the service of the capital. In this paper, such a management process of affects is definedas enclosure of the affects. First, this is made possible from the imaginationof spatialization by building ‘fence’ among the affects, secondly, this process of ‘fencing’ is obviously capitalist and liberalist project, and thirdly, the effect is dismantling the ‘emotional commons’ between people. In addition, it has been one of the ‘new primitive accumulation’ methodologies to overcomethe crisis of the capitalism of the late 60’s. It seems to be around IMF(1997) that the latest new primitive accumulation has started in South Korea. To deal with the disgust, not being entrapped by the enclosure of affects, we need to understand disgust as the affiliation of various affects. For example, disgust gets nourishment from the culture of contempt and continues its effects in the form of fun forcing shame to others when the pleasure has become the most important mission to accomplish. Only when we approach to the disgust as a whole, we can avoid serving the affects management of our days.

keywords
정동, 정동의 관리, 정동의 인클로저, 혐오, 수치심, 모멸감, 행복, 행복 산업, 재미, 주목경제, Affect, Affects Management, Enclosure of Affects, Disgust, Shame, Contempt, Happiness, Fun, Happiness Industry, Attention Economy

Reference

1.

김찬호, 『모멸감』, 문학과지성사, 2014, 23~307쪽.

2.

김홍중, 『마음의 사회학』, 문학동네, 2009, 17~103쪽.

3.

윤보라, ｢김치녀와 벌거벗은 임금님들｣, 『여성혐오가 어쨌다구?』, 현실문화, 2015, 11~45쪽.

4.

이길호, 『우리는 디씨』, 이매진, 2012, 18~284쪽.

5.

조정환, 『인지자본주의』, 갈무리, 2011, 55~91쪽.

6.

한병철, 『투명사회』, 문학과 지성사, 2014, 13~102쪽.

7.

마사 너스바움, 조계원 역, 『혐오와 수치심』, 민음사, 2015, 139~624쪽.

8.

빠올로 비르노, 김상운 역, 『다중』, 갈무리, 2004, 125~163쪽.

9.

스튜어트 월턴, 이희재 역, 『인간다움의 조건』, 사이언스북스, 2012, 9~515쪽.

10.

실비아 페데리치, 황성원·김민철 역, 『캘리번과 마녀』, 갈무리, 2011, 44~192쪽.

11.

에바 일루즈, 김정아 역, 『감정 자본주의』, 돌베개, 2011, 1~238쪽.

12.

우에노 치즈코, 나일등 역, 『여성혐오를 혐오한다』, 은행나무, 2012, 30~44쪽.

13.

윌리엄 데이비스, 황성원 역, 『행복산업』, 동녘, 2015, 6~206쪽.

14.

줄리아 크리스테바, 서민원 역, 『공포의 권력』, 동문선, 2001, 21~94쪽.

15.

찰스 다윈, 김홍표 역, 『인간과 동물의 감정표현』, 지만지, 2014, 3~434쪽.

16.

Patricia Ticineto Clough and Jean Halley(eds)., The Affective Turn, Duke University Press, 2007, pp.ix-xiii.

17.

문강형준, ｢재난 시대의 정동｣, 『여성문학연구』 제 35호, 한국여성문학학회, 2015, 41~67쪽.

18.

박권일, ｢공백을 들여다보는 어떤 방식: 넷우익이라는 ‘보편 증상’｣, 『모멘툼』 vol.01, 자음과모음, 2014, 15~62쪽.

19.

손희정, ｢페미니즘 리부트: 한국영화를 통해 보는 포스트-페미니즘, 그리고 그 이후｣, 『문화/과학』 83호, 문화과학사, 2015, 14~47쪽.

20.

손희정, ｢혐오의 시대: 2015년 혐오는 어떻게 문제적 정동이 되었는가｣, 『여/성이론』 제 32호, 여이연, 2015, 12~42쪽.

21.

천관율, ｢이제 국가 앞에 당당히 선 ‘일베의 청년들’｣, 『시사IN』 367호, 2014.09.29, http://www.sisainlive.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=21341(2015년 11월 8일 검색).

Feminism and Korean Literature

e-Submission OA Policy