ISSN : 1229-4632
Unlike general perceptions for Lee Young-do putting priority on private things over literature and a peripheral evaluation method on being a "female writer," this study aimed at exploring into what how much her literature world was in pursuit of public things and putting them into practice. The start of Lee's literature was escape from a private sphere. Lee Young-do's desire for public things, which was deeply incorporated into her life made her acknowledge that she herself was "the Ryu Gwan-soon of the future," which was originated from the incident of her childhood that was accepted as her destiny. As a result, since publishing a collection of letters with Ryu Chi-hwan, Lee Young-do started to replace a private relation with a public one. And based on the fund generated from the collection, she set up the "Jeong-un Literature Award, named after her pseudonym and made her institutionalized and a power. The transfer of her name to a material condition for literal power was also resulted from her efforts for fulfilling her historical duty granted by her herself in an ethnic and nation unit sphere. Her public desires stands out in her political․historical awareness which has been revealed in a Sijo text. Sijo roughly translates to a traditional Korean lyric form consisting of three long lines. The image of the "Lamp"structured in the lowest bottom of a public desire reveals an enlightened will which lights a dark night and embraces a newly-dawned day while sacrificing oneself. The Lamp is transformed into "The Azaleas" which is symbolic of the young victimized souls who were fallen for 4·19revolutionary spirit and democracy, which also shows a public will of Lee Young-do who self-acknowledged as the "Ryu Gwan-soon of the future." Itcould be safely said that the geographical landscape of the national land is used to reveal the love for the national land and a criticism for reality, not as a landscape being objectively seen and her interest in Lee Sun-shin shows that she sought to find a rudder for reality in nationalism while defining the reality of her fatherland as a warlike age.
부완혁, 「혁명의 현단계와 금후」, ꡔ사상계ꡕ, 1960. 6.
이영도, ꡔ청저집ꡕ, 문예, 1954.
이영도, ꡔ석류ꡕ, 중앙출판공사, 1968.
이영도, ꡔ언약ꡕ, 중앙출판공사, 1976.
이영도, ꡔ나의 그리움은 오직 푸르고 깊은 것ꡕ, 중앙출판사, 1976
이영도, ꡔ비둘기 내리는 뜨락ꡕ, 민조사, 1966.
이영도, ꡔ머나먼 사념의 길목ꡕ, 중앙출판공사, 1971.
김종, 「이영도론」, ꡔ시조와 비평ꡕ, 1992. 봄, 33쪽.
김해성, ꡔ한국현대시문학사ꡕ, 형설출판사, 1974, 572쪽.
레이몬드 고이스, 조승래 옮김, ꡔ공적 선(善) 사적 선(善)ꡕ, 기파랑, 2010, 151쪽.
박옥금, ꡔ내가 아는 이영도, 그 달빛같은ꡕ, 문학과 청년, 2001.
박을수, ꡔ한국시조문학전사ꡕ, 성문각, 1978, 421~426쪽.
사이토 준이치, 윤대석 외 옮김, ꡔ민주적 공공성ꡕ, 이음, 2009, 18~31쪽.
이병기, 신석정 공저, ꡔ명시조 감상ꡕ, 박영사, 1958, 117쪽.
임선묵, ꡔ시조동인지의 양상ꡕ, 단국대출판사, 1978, 58쪽.
정완영, 「이영도, 그 시와 인생」, ꡔ시문학ꡕ, 1976. 5, 59쪽.
정영자, ꡔ한국여성시인 연구ꡕ, 평민사, 1996, 200쪽.
조남현, 「개인서정과 공적 감정의 넘나들기」, ꡔ우리시대 현대시조 100인선—이영도 시조집ꡕ, 태학사, 2000.
조현경, ꡔ이영도 평전ꡕ, 영학출판사, 1984, 132~138쪽.
차원현, 「정전과 동원」, ꡔ1960~70년대 한국문학의 지배—저항 이념의 헤게모니ꡕ, 역락, 2007, 326~327쪽
한나 아렌트, 이진우․태정호 옮김, ꡔ인간의 조건ꡕ, 한길사, 1996, 55~112쪽.
한국문인협회 편, ꡔ해방문학20년ꡕ, 정음사, 1966, 180쪽.
박정애, 「‘여류’의 기원과 정체성」, 인하대 박사학위논문, 2003, 39쪽.
신현필, 「이영도 시조 연구」, 한국교원대 석사학위논문, 1997, 14~22쪽.
이숙례, 「한국 여성시조의 변모양상 연구」, 동의대 박사학위논문, 2007, 153쪽.