바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

Spatialized Technoscientific Practice and Material Culture in the Laboratory

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2010, v.0 no.34, pp.185-223

Abstract

Laboratory has been the main theme of Science and Technology Studies (STS) including history of science and sociology of science, as the space where scientific practices take place. However, most of the laboratory studies that have been done in Korea are based upon contents analysis or short-term ethnographic studies only. This research is based on 1-year long-term participatory observation in Neuroscience Research Institute (NRI) which is headed by Prof. Zang-Hee Cho who is one of the early inventors of PET (Positron Emission Tomography). Since NRI opened in 2004, it has been one of the central places where brain science is being studied in Korea. This article shows that behind the success of the neuroscience laboratory lies heterogeneous actors’ formation of complex actor-networks. And it also argues that the laboratory has the properties of ‘heterotopia’ in Foucauldian term.

keywords
laboratory studies, brain science, PET and MRI, actor-network assemblage, heterotopia, 실험실, 뇌과학, PET(양전자방출단층촬영장치)과 MRI(자기공명영상), 행위자-네트워크 아상블라주, 헤테로토피아

Reference

1.

강내희. 2002[1995]. 공간, 육체, 권력: 낯선 거리의 일상 . 문화과학사.

2.

김광명. 2004. 칸트 미학의 이해 . 철학과 현실사.

3.

김석철, 실미안느 아가신스키, 피터 아이젠만, 버나드 츄미, 알베르토 페레즈 고메즈, 쟝 끌로드 게든, 이토 토요, 렘 쿨하스, 멜빈 챠니, 실비아 라빈, 프레드릭 제임슨, 레베카 코메이, 아라타 이소자키, 다니엘 리베스킨드 등. 1997. Anyplace:장소의 논리 (Anyone 시리즈 제2권). 현대건축사.

4.

디자인문화실험실 편. 2001. 디자인문화비평 제4권: 디자인과 테크놀로지 . 안그라픽스.

5.

박영욱. 2009. 필로아키텍처: 현대건축과 공간 그리고 철학적 담론 . 향연.

6.

안성찬. 2004. 숭고의 미학 . 유로서적.

7.

자크 데리다, 렘 쿨하스, 피터 아이젠만, 타다오 안도, 아라키 이소잨, 제프리 키픈스, 프랭크 게리, 아키라 아사다, 매들린 긴즈, 다니엘 리베스킨드, 라파엘 모네오, 이그나시 드 솔라 모랄레스 루비오 등. 1998. Anywhere: 공간의 논리 (Anyone 시리즈 제4권). 현대건축사.

8.

홍성욱. 2008. 인간의 얼굴을 한 과학: 융합시대의 과학문화 . 서울대학교출판부. 특히 제3장 「과학과 건축」, 69~96쪽.

9.

Antoch, G. et al. 2009. “Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging?” Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 36(Suppl 1), S.113~120.

10.

Berry, A. and D. Slater. 2003. “Technology, politics and the market: an interview with Michel Callon.” Economy and Society, 31, pp.285~306.

11.

Biagioli, M. (ed.) 1999. The Science Studies Reader(Routledge).

12.

Blake, P. et al. 2003. “Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT): Clinical Applications.” J Neuro-Opthalmol, 23(1), pp.34~41.

13.

Blume, S. 1992. Insight and Industry: On the Dynamics of Technological Change in Medicine (MIT Press).

14.

Bok, D. 2003. Universities in the Marketplace: the commercialization of higher education (Princeton Univ Press).

15.

Bowker, G. and S. L. Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (MIT Press).

16.

Brix, G. et al. 2009. “Risks and safety aspects related to PET/MR examinations.” Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 36(Suppl 1), S.131~138.

17.

Brown, J. 2000, “Privatizing the University.” Science, 290, p.1701.

18.

Brown, N. and A. Webster. 2004. New Medical Technologies and Society: Reordering Life (Polity Press).

19.

Brown, N., B. Rappert, and A. Webster (eds.). 2000. Contested Futures: A Sociology of Perspective Techno-Science (Ashgate).

20.

Bud, R. and D. Warner (eds.) 1998. Instruments of Science: An Historical Encyclopedia (New York and London: The Science Museum, London and The National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution).

21.

Burri, R. and J. Dumit (eds.). 2007. Biomedicine as Culture: Instrumental Practices, Technoscientific Knowledge, and New Modes of Life (Routledge).

22.

Callon, M. 2003. “The Increasing Involvement of Concerned Groups in R&D Policies:What Lessons for Public Powers?” in Aldo Geuna, J. Ammon Salter & W. Edward Steinmueller (eds.) Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance (Edward Elgar), pp.30~68.

23.

Cho, ZH, et al. 1976. “Circular Ring Transverse Axial Positron Camera for 3-Dimensional Reconstruction of Radionuclides Distribution.” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. NS-23, No.1, pp.613~622.

24.

Cho, ZH, et al. 2007. “A hybrid PET-MRI: an integrated molecular-genetic imaging system with HRRT-PET and 7.0-T MRI.” Wiley Periodicals, 17, pp.252~265.

25.

Cho, ZH, et al. 2008a. “A fusion PET-MRI system with a high-resolution research tomograph-PET and ultra-high field 7.0 T-MRI for the molecular-genetic imaging of the brain.” Proteomics, 8, pp.1302~1323.

26.

Cho, ZH, et al. 2008b. “New Brain Atlas - Mapping the human brain in vivo with 7.0 T MRI and comparison with postmortem hitology: Will these images change modern medicine?.” Wiley Periodicals, 18, pp.2~8.

27.

Cizek, J. et al. 2004. “Fast and robust registration of PET and MR images of human brain.” NeuroImage, 22, pp.434~442.

28.

Clarke, A. 1991. “Social Worlds/Arenas Theory as Organization Theory.” in D. Maines (ed.) Social Organization and Social Process (Aldine de Gruyter), pp.119~158.

29.

Clarke, A. 2003. “Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn.” Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), pp.553~576.

30.

Collins, H. M. 1985. Changing Orders: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (Sage).

31.

Crang, M. and N. Thrift. 2000. Thinking Space (Routledge).

32.

De Vita, E. et al. 2005. “Localized 4.7 T Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Neonatal Encephalopathy: Implementation, safetty and preliminary interpretation of results.” Imaging Decisions, 8(4), pp.31~41.

33.

Deleuze, G. 1988. Le Pli, Leibniz et le Baroque (Seuil); 질 들뢰즈 지음. 이찬웅 옮김. 2004. 주름, 라이프니츠와 바로크 . 문학과지성사.

34.

Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. 1987[1980]. trans. by Brian Massumi. A Thousand Plateaus:Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Univ. of Minnesota Press).

35.

Delso, G. et al. 2009. “PET/MRI system design.” Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36 (Suppl 1), S.86~92.

36.

Dierig, S. 2003. “Engines for Experiment: Laboratory Revolution and Industrial Labor in the 19th-Century City.” in Sven Dierig et al. (eds.) Science and the City, Osiris vol. 18. 2003), pp.116~134.

37.

Dierig, S., J. Lachmund, and J. Mendelsohn (eds.). 2003. Science and the City, Osiris, Vol. 18.

38.

Dierig, S., J. Lachmund, and J. Mendelsohn (eds.). 2003. “Toward an Urban History of Science.” in Sven Dierig et al. (eds.) Science and the City, Osiris, vol. 18, pp.1~19.

39.

Downey, G. L. and J. Dumit, (eds.) 1997. Cyborgs and Citadels: Anthropoligical Interventions in Emerging Sciences and Technologies (School of American Research Press).

40.

Dumit, J. 2000. “When Explanations Rest: ‘Good-enough’ Brain Science and the New Sociomedical Disorders.” in M. Lock, A. Young, and A. Cambrosio (eds.) Living and Working with the New Biomedical Technologies: Intersections of Inquiry (Cambridge Univ Press), pp.209~232.

41.

Dumit, J. 2004. Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity (Princeton Univ. Press).

42.

Durkeim, E. 1972. Selected Writings, ed. and trans. by A. Giddens (Cambridge Univ Press).

43.

Durkeim, E. and M. Mauss. 1963[1903]. Primitive Classification, trans. by R. Needham (Univ of Chicago Press).

44.

El-Haddad, G. et al. 2006. “PET/MRI depicsts the exact location of meniscal tear associated with synovitis.” Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 33, pp.507~508 (Image of the month).

45.

Etzkowitz, H. 2003. “Innovation in Innovation: the triple helix in university-industry-government relations.” Social Science Information, 42(3), pp.293~337.

46.

Etzkowitz, H. et al. 1997. Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (Cassell).

47.

Etzkowitz, H. et al. 1998. Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia (State Univ of New York Press).

48.

Etzkowitz, H. et al. 2000. “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’to a Triple helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.” Research Policy, 29, pp.109~123.

49.

Fan, F. 2003. “Science in a Chinese Entrepot: British Naturaists and Their Chinese Associates in Old Canton.” in Sven Dierig et al. (eds.) Science and the City, Osiris, vol.18, pp.60~78.

50.

Forgan, S. 2005. “Building the Museum: Knowledge, Conflict, and the Power of Place.” Isis, Vol. 96, No. 4, pp.572~585.

51.

Foucault, M. 1967. “Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias and Panopticum.” in N. Leach (ed.). Rethinking Architecture (Routledge, 1997), pp.350~367.

52.

Fujimura, J. and M. Fortun. 1996. “Constructing Knowledge Across Social Worlds: The Case of DNA Sequence Database in Molecular Biology.” in L. Nader (ed.) Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power, and Knowledge (Routledge), pp.160~173.

53.

Geertz, C. 1973. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” in The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, Basic Books, pp.3~30.

54.

Gibbons, M. et al. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (Sage).

55.

Gieryn, T. 2000. “A Space for Place in Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology, 26, pp.463~496.

56.

Gieryn, T. 2006. “City as Truth-Spot: Laboratories and Field-Sites in Urban Studies.” Social Studies of Science, 36, pp.5~38.

57.

Gilmore, D. 2008. “Lighting a Fire for Our Future.” J. of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 36(1), 7A(Message from the president).

58.

Grazioso, R. et al. 2006. “APD-based PET detector for simultaneous PET/MR imaging.” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 569, pp.301~305.

59.

Gulberlet, M. et al. 2004. “Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.” Imaging Decisions, 7(3), pp.23~30.

60.

Hannaway, O. 1986. “Laboratory Design and the Aim of Science: Andreas Libavius versus Tycho Brahe.” Isis, Vol.77, No.4, pp.585~610.

61.

Heiss, W-D. 2009. “The potential of PET/MR for brain imaging.” Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 36(Suppl 1), S.105~112.

62.

Helden, A. and T. Hankins (eds.). 1994. Instruments, as Osiris, Vol.9 (History of Science Society).

63.

Henke, C. 2000. “Making a Place for Science: the Field Trial.” Social Studies of Science, 30, pp.483~512.

64.

Henke, C. 2006. “Changing Ecologies: Science and Environmental Politics in Agriculture.”in S. Frickel and K. Moore (eds.). The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power (Univ of Wisconsin Press), pp.215~243.

65.

Henke, C. and T. Gieryn. 2008. “Sites of Scientific Practice: The Enduring Importance of Place.” in E. Hackett et al. (eds.) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (3rd ed.), MIT Press, pp.353~376.

66.

Hetherington, K. 2006[1997]. The Badlands of Modernity: Heterotopia and Social Ordering (Routledge).

67.

Hicks, RJ. et al. 2009. “PET/MRI: a different spin from under the rim.” Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36 (Suppl 1), S.10~14.

68.

Hoffman, M. et al. 2009. “Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques.” Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36 (Suppl 1), S.93~104.

69.

Hoffmann, RT. et al. 2003. “Imaging strategies in the diagnostics of colirectal metastases.” Imaging Decisions, 6(3), pp.17~25.

70.

Irwin, A. and B. Wynne (eds.) 1996. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge Univ Press).

71.

Itti, L. et al. 1997. “Robust Multimodality Registration for Brain Mapping.” Human Brain Mapping, 5, pp.3~17.

72.

Joyce, K. 2005. “Appealing images: magnetic resonance imaging and the production of authoritative knowledge.” Social Studies of Science, 35(4), pp.437~462.

73.

Joyce, K. 2006. “From numbers to pictures: the development of MRI and the visual turn in medicine.” Science as Culture, 15(1), pp.1~22.

74.

Joyce, K. 2008. Magnetic Appeal: MRI and the Myth of Transparency (Cornell Univ. Press).

75.

Kaiser, D. 2000. “Stick-figure Realism: Conventions, Reification, and the Persistence Imaging and the Visual Turn in Medicine.” Representations, 70, pp.49~86.

76.

Kevles, B. H. 1997. Naked to the Bone: Medical Imaging in the Twentieth Century (Rutgers Univ Press).

77.

Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (eds.) 1983. Science Observed: Perspectives in the Social Study of Science (Sage).

78.

Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science (Pergamon Press).

79.

Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Harvard Univ Press)

80.

Kohler, R. 2002. Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology (Univ of Chicago Press).

81.

Kopp, M. et al. 2007. “Image Fusion of Positron Emission Tomographic.” Scan with Radiotherapy Planning CT in a Patientwith Parotid Gland Cancer Imaging Decisions, 10(2), pp.33~35.

82.

Latour, B. 1983. “Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world” in K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds.) Science Observed: Perspectives in the Social Study of Science (Sage, 1983), pp.141~170.

83.

Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Harvard Univ Press).

84.

Latour, B. 1988. The Pasteurization of France (Harvard Univ Press).

85.

Latour, B. and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: the Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Sage).

86.

Latour, B. and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton Univ. Press).

87.

Leach, N. ed. 1997. Rethinking Architecture (Routledge).

88.

Levitt, T. 2003. “Organizing Sight, Seeing Organization: The Diverging Optical Possibilities of City and Country.” in Sven Dierig et al. (eds.) Science and the City, Osiris, vol.18, pp.101~115.

89.

Lynch, M. 1985. Art and Artifacts in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory (Routledge & Kegan Paul).

90.

Lynch, M. 1991. “Laboratory Space and the Technological Complex: An Investigation of Topical Contextures.” Science in Context, 4(1), pp.51~78.

91.

Lynch, M. 1993. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science (Cambridge Univ Press).

92.

Lynch, M. and S. Woolgar (eds.) 1988. Representation in Scientific Practice (MIT Press).

93.

Marchessault, J. and K. Sawchuk (eds.). 2000. Wild Science: Reading feminism, medicine and the media (Routledge).

94.

Mendelsohn, J. 2003. “The Microscopist of Modern Life.” in Sven Dierig et al. (eds.) Science and the City, Osiris, vol.18, pp.150~170.

95.

Mol, A. M. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice (Duke Univ Press).

96.

Nye, M (ed.). 2003 The Cambrige History of Science, Vol.5. The Modern Physical and Mathematical Sciences (Cambridge Univ. Press).

97.

Ong, A. and S. Collier (eds.). 2005. Global Assemblages (Blackwell Publishing).

98.

Oudshoorn, N., and T. Pinch (eds.). 2003. How Users Matter: the Co-Construction of Users and Technology (MIT Press).

99.

Oyen, W. et al. 2003. “Positron Emission Tomography with F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.” Imaging Decisions, 3, pp.26~30.

100.

Phillips, D. 2003. “Friends of Nature: Urban Sociability ad Regional Natural History in Dresden, 1800-1850.” in Sven Dierig et al. (eds.) Science and the City, Osiris, vol. 18, pp.43~59.

101.

Pichler, BJ, et al. 2008. “PET/MRI hybrid imaging: devices and initial results.” Eur Radiol, 18, pp.1077~1086.

102.

Pirich, C. 2007. “The role of multimodality imaging in the management of head and neck tumours.” Imaging Decisions, 11(2), Editorial.

103.

Pirotte, B. et al. 2003. “Combined PET and MRI for the Planning of Stereotactic Brain Biopsies in Children: Experiences in 9 Cases.” Pediatric Neurosurgery, 38, pp.146~155.

104.

Prasad, A. 2005a. “Making Images/Making Bodies: Visibilizing and Discipling Thru MRI.” ST & HV, 30(2), pp.291~316.

105.

Prasad, A. 2005b, “Scientific culture in the ‘Other’ theater of ‘modern science’: An analysis of the culture of MRI research in India.” Social Studies of Science, 35(4), pp.463~489.

106.

Prentice, R. 2005. “The Anatomy of Surgical Simulation.” Social Studies of Science, 35(6), pp.837~866.

107.

Qing, F. et al. 2008. “Clinical impact of radiologist interpretation of CT in PET/CT imaging.” Imaging Decisions, 12(4), pp.15~23.

108.

Rapp, R. 1998. “Real-Time Fetus: The Role of the Sonogram in the Age of Monitored Reproduction.” in G. Downey and J. Dumit (eds.). Cyborg and Citadels: Anthropological Interventions in Emerging Sciences and Technologies (School of American Research Press), pp.31~48.

109.

Raylman, R. R. et al. 2007. “Simultaneous acquisition of MR Spectroscopydata and PET images with a prototype MR-compatible, small animal PET imager.” J. of Magnetic Resonance, 186, pp.305~310.

110.

Ritzer, G. 2004. The Globalization of Nothing (Sage).

111.

Rodrigues, J. (ed). 2002. The New Knowledge Economy in Europe: A Strategy for International Competitiveness (Edward Elgar).

112.

Rose, N. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the 21st Century (Princeton Univ Press).

113.

Rudy, A. et al. 2007. Universities in the Age of Corporate Science (Temple Univ. Press).

114.

Ruse, M. and P. Taylor. 1991. “Pictorial representation in biology.” Biology and Philosophy, 6(2), pp.125~294.

115.

Rutten, F. and S. J. Reiser (eds.). 1988. The Economics of Medical Technology (Springer-Verlag).

116.

Shapin, S. 1988. “The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England.” Isis, Vol. 79, No.3 (Special Issue on Artifact and Experiment), pp.373~404.

117.

Slaughter, S. and G. Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press).

118.

Slaughter, S. and L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University (Johns Hopkins Univ Press).

119.

Slomkla, P. et al. 2008. “Multimodality image registration with software: state-of-the-art.”Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 36 (Suppl 1), S.44~55.

120.

Sobottka, S. B. et al. 2002. “Comparison of functional brain PET images and intraoperative brain-mapping data using image-guided surgery.” Computer Aided Surgery, 7, pp.317~325.

121.

Soja, E. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso).

122.

Star, S. L. and J. Griesmer. 1989. “Institutioinal Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907~1939.” Social Studies of Science, 19, pp.387~420; reprinted in M. Biagioli (ed.) The Science Studies Reader (Routledge, 1999), pp.505~524.

123.

Struken, M. & L. Cartwright. 2000, Practices of Looking (Oxford Univ Press).

124.

Sunder Rajan, K. 2006. Biocapital (Duke Univ Press).

125.

Sureshbabu, W. et al. 2005. “PET/CT Imaging Artifacts” J of Nucl Med Tech, 33(3), pp.156~165.

126.

Teich, A. 2000. Technology and the Future (St. Martin’s Press).

127.

Townsend, DW. 2008. “Multimodalitye imaging of structure and function.” Phys. Med. Biol, 53, R.1~39.

128.

Traweek, S. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: the World of High Energy Physicists (Harvard Univ Press).

129.

Urry, J. 1995. Consuming Places (Routledge).

130.

van Beek, E. 2007. “Use of virtual imaging techniques - from top to bottom, from life to death.” Imaging Decisions, 11(1) Editorial.

131.

van Dijck, J. 2005. The Transparent Body: A Cultural Analysis of Medical Imaging (Univ of Washington Press).

132.

Vligen, R. et al. 2003. “Magnetic Resonance Imaging of rectal cancer: technique and pitfalls.” Imaging Decisions, 6(3), pp.10~16.

133.

von Schulthess, G. et al. 2009. “A look ahead: PET/MR versus PET/CT.” Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 36 (Suppl 1), S.3~9

134.

Wehrl, HF. et al. 2009. “Pre-clinical PET/MR: technological advances and new perspectives in biomedical research.” Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36 (Suppl 1), S.56~68.

135.

Weiner, D. and M. Sauter. 2003, “The City of Paris and the Rise of Clinical Medicine.” in Sven Dierig et al. (eds.) Science and the City, Osiris, vol.18, pp.23~42.

136.

Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces (Sage).

137.

Wolbarst, A. 1999. Looking Within: How X-ray, CT, MRI, Ultrasound, and Other Medical Images Are Created (Univ of California Press).

138.

Wynne, B. 1992. “Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and the Public Uptake of Science.” Public Understanding of Science, 1, pp.281~304.

139.

Wynne, B. 1996. “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-lay Knowledge Divide.” in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, (eds.) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology (Sage).

140.

가천의과학대학교. 2006. 뇌기능 활용 및 뇌질환 치료기술 개발사업: 뇌영상 신호분석 기자재 개발 및 실용화에 관한 연구 과제 보고서 . 과학기술부 최종보고서. 과제관리번호 NA-2.

141.

경북대학교(이재태 외). 2006. 권역별 싸이클로트론 연구소 구축(Establishment of regional cyclotron center) . 과학기술부 최종보고서.

142.

대한민국특허청(KR) 등록특허공보(B1). 「PET-MRI 퓨전영상시스템」. 등록번호:10-0791021, 등록일자: 2007년 12월 26일, 공고일자: 2008년 1월 7일, 특허권자: 가천의과학대학교 산학협력단 & 동보시스템 주식회사. 발명자: 조장희·이철옥·김영보·윤자원·안형진·김동성·심홍.

143.

조선대학교 산학협력단(민영돈 외). 2006. 권역별 싸이클로트론 연구소 구축사업 (Foundation of regional cyclotron research center) . 과학기술부 최종보고서.

144.

한국원자력연구소 부설 원자력의학원(김유석 외). 2003. IAEA 및 아시아 국가와의 싸이클로트론 활용기술 공동연구 및 기술 수출기반 구축 사업: 최종보고서((The)Establishment of infrastructure of research and export for the cyclotron with IAEA and asia nations) . 과학기술부 최종보고서.

145.

한국원자력연구소 부설 원자력병원(채종서 외). 2002. 의료용 싸이클로트론 가속기 개발: 최종보고서(Development of cyclotron for the medical applications) . 과학기술부 최종보고서.

146.

한국원자력연구소 부설 원자력병원(홍성운 외). 2005. 싸이클로트론 및 PET 이용기술 개발(Development of cyclotron and PET application) . 과학기술부 최종보고서.

147.

Star, S. L. and J. Griesmer. 1989. reprinted in M. Biagioli (ed.) The Science Studies Reader (Routledge, 1999), pp.505~524.

Space and Environment