ISSN : 1225-6706
사회적 경제조직이 지속적인 성과를 창출하기 위해서는 정부와 시민사회, 기업이 상호작용하는 거버넌스가 전제되어야 한다. 본 연구는 사회적 경제조직의 성과요인을 실증적으로 밝혀내기 위해 거버넌스적 관점에서 접근했다. 실증분석 결과 사회적 경제조직의 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인은 정부 부문의 법적 지원, 시민사회 부문의 신뢰와 착한 소비, 기업 부문의 기업윤리와 협력·네트워크, 그리고조직관리가 통계적으로 유의미한 영향을 미쳤다. 이와 같은 분석 결과를 바탕으로 사회적 경제조직의 정책 방향을 다음과 같이 제안했다. 첫째, 정부 부문에서는 사회적 경제조직의 인증제도와 법률을 통합화하여 법적지원을 강화해야 한다. 둘째, 시민사회 부문에서는 사회적 경제조직의 신뢰 제고와 착한 소비 확산을 위해 공공기관 우선구매제도 활용과 사회적 경제조직의 정부 민간위탁 사업 참여가 필요하다. 셋째, 기업 부문에서는 기업윤리 혹은 기업의사회적 책임 제고, 일반 기업과 사회적 경제조직의 협력·네트워크 강화, 사회적경제조직의 조직역량을 높이기 위한 전략적 조직관리가 필요하다.
The social enterprise in Korea emerged to solve the social problems such as therise in unemployment, increased demand for social services, and so on. As a result,the policies on social enterprise were established and the Social Enterprise PromotionAct was introduced in 2007. Since then, the number of social enterprises has increasedmore than 1,000 in Korea. However, despite such quantitative expansionover the past few years, the government policies have been criticized for the qualitativeproblems faced by individual social enterprises. In order to respond to thesecriticisms, the government’s latest policies emphasize the roles of local community. Actually the significant roles of local government were referred to in the 2nd SocialEnterprise Promotion Plan published by Ministry of Employment and Labor in 2013. In spite of the government’s support, the researches on the role of local governmentor local legislation have been relatively rare. Therefore, this study tried to analyzethe actors’ recognition of the social enterprise promotion policy in local government,Kyunggi-do. Specifically the study compared the attitudes of two groups who areinvolved in the policy: policy providers and beneficiaries. The results showed thattwo groups, represented by managers and officials, had different awareness on thepolicy depending on their social and economic positions. This study will providesignificant implications to derive the strategic orientation of the social enterprisepolicy.
본 연구는 마을 공동체가 창출하는 지역생태지식을 활용한 자연 자원 관리에대한 사례 연구로서, 태국 남부 타살라 지역이 대상 사례이다. 주민 참여형 자연자원 관리는 비효율적일 수 있는 중앙집권적인 자연 자원의 한계를 극복하기 위한 대안으로 꾸준히 제기되었으나, 제도가 도입된 이후 거버넌스의 복잡성 증가,과다한 참여 비용 문제 등 단점도 최근 문제점으로 제기되고 있다. 따라서 최근관련 연구에 있어 제도의 혼합(institutional mix)을 제도 형성과 운영의 맥락(context)에 맞춰 해석하여 사회적 학습(social learning)을 하고, 이를 다시 제도 개선에 투입하는 ‘발견법(heuristic)’적 접근이 강조되고 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 이론적 논의를 태국 사례를 통해 구체화하고자 한다. 연구결과 태국의 마을공동체 주도형 자연 자원 관리 사례는 이론적 및 실증적 측면에서 다양한 시사점이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이론적으로는 참여형 자연 자원 관리가 발전해온 제도 발전의 맥락과 다양한 이해관계자 간 거버넌스가 연구 대상이 된다. 실증적으로는 상향식 및 하향식 제도 발전이 부딪치는 현장을 분석함으로써 주민들과의 갈등 기제와 이를 극복해나가는 거버넌스에 대한 성찰적 발전을가능하게 한다. 최근 메콩 지역에 대한 민간 차원의 교류와 연대가 빈번해지는요즘 이러한 태국을 대상으로 한 사례 연구는 한국 시민사회와 공공자원 관리에서 정책적 시사점을 제공할 수 있을 것이다.
For the last two decades, Korean government has utilized Public-Private-Partnership(PPP) program in order to provide large-scale infrastructures such as road,railway, harbor, etc. The development of PPP program is related to the discourseof financialization, or the dynamic integration between spatial and capital by usingnew financial methods including project finance. In terms of financialization, thispaper aims to introduce concepts of financial geography and to illustrate the basicstructure of project finance. By reviewing previous approaches on financialization,I employ the perspective of Marxian view on the relationship between capital andspace in what Harvey contributed through his analysis of capitalism. I also emphasizethe perspective of financial geography on basis of valuation methods in order tounderstand the dynamics between capital and space. Consequently, it is revealedthrough a valuation analysis that the South Korean government should have beenpaid for a large amount of subsidy for minimum guarantee revenue even in thePPP programs.
This paper is to analyse the Multi-Scale and Socio-Economic Change of thermalpower plant and Keihin Coastal Industrial Belt during Japan’s high growth period(1955~73) in multi-scalar perspective. The demand for power during Japan’s highgrowth period has increased drastically upon the industrialization of heavy chemicalindustry and the transition into mass consumption society. The construction of heavyoil-burning power plants aimed for the high-capacity and efficiency, this processwas combined with the construction on the petrochemical complex (kombinat). Thisspatial accumulation of principle in the nodal system development has brought tothe complete changes in life-world. The growth-oriented state and industry set importanceon the advantage of agglomeration (the expansion of the plant), while reformistlocal governments and civil society brought out the disadvantage of agglomeration(pollution issue). Two spheres have polarized on the cause and problem-solvingprocesses about pollution conflicts. The specific cases were Tokyo Memorandumon pollution control and Yokohama Pollution Control Agreement after mid-1960s,the withdrawal of Chiba’s plant construction in early 1970s. The three cases inKeihin Coastal Industrial Belt (Tokyo-Yokohama-Chiba) helps us to know the aspectsof conflicts caused by power plants of Tokyo Electric Power Company(TEPCO). These plant facilities have intensified the social conflicts, accelerated tomove out the core area in Tokyo. The thermal power plant will be much moreimportant since the nuclear power plants have stopped after Fukushima nucleardisaster. Likewise, the change of energy source in thermal plant is the core link,it has us understand the change of collective consciousness on the power industry.
This study conceptualizes the ‘unmediated’ public space as an alternative againstterritorialized ones from the view point that the publicness of public space is notgiven, but achieved by continual practices for the deterritorialization of public spaces. By establishing the concept, I argue that the empty and value neutral image ofpublic space is ideological phantom, rather public space should be deterritorializedto include unmediated bodies and actions, and be filled up with them. The caseof this study, Royal Festival Hall in London, reveals its unmediatedness and a varietyof bodies and actions that can not be expected in other public spaces. What makesthis study significant in South Korean context is not merely the fact that the hallis a popular buzzing place, but it can include marginalized bodies. It could also,more generally, open up an alternative perspective about public space that enablespublics to encounter others, thereby create various ‘in-between’s.