바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.18 No.2
Citation Share

Word and coding-unit superiority effect in the perception of Korean letter

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2006, v.18 no.2, pp.139-156


& (2006). Word and coding-unit superiority effect in the perception of Korean letter. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 18(2), 139-156.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The literature demonstrated that the word superiority effect was consistently found in English, but not in Korean. Rather, mixed results, the word superiority effect and inferiority effect, were found in Korean. The inconsistency among research findings might be due to the diversity in Korean letters and its resultant difficulty in research methodology. The purpose of this study is to examine the word superiority effect in Korean letters using a modified paradigm developed by Reicher(1969). In this study, Korean letters only with English arrangement were used for the Experiment 1 and ones with typical Korean arrangement were used for the Experiment 2. The results showed the word superiority effect as well as coding-unit superiority effect in Korean letter regardless of arrangement. Also, consonant superiority effect, a phenomenon that consonants are recognized better than vowels, was found. This results suggested that The hypothesis of global shape does not explain the word superiority effect in Korean letter which are characterized by assembling letters in order to maintain square frame.

keywords
한글 낱자지각, 단어우월효과, 글자우월효과, 자음우월효과, the perception of Korean letter, word superiority effect, coding-unit superiority effect, consonant superiority effect, the perception of Korean letter, word superiority effect, coding-unit superiority effect, consonant superiority effect

Reference

1.

(2003) 현대 국어 사용 빈도 조사 보고서,

2.

(1989) 한글의 자모구성 형태에 따른 자모 및 글자 인식,

3.

(1994) 한글 글자 맥락에서의 자모 지각,

4.

(1990) 두 음절 한글 단어에 있어서의 낱자의 지각 상호작용활성화 모형과 초보지각자-기억자 모형의 비교 검증 1990년도 한국인지과학회 춘계학술발표대회 논문집,

5.

(1992) 한글 단어 재인에 있어서 글자처리와 낱자의 지각 실험 및 인지,

6.

(1995) 한글 단어 재인을 위한 시각 처리 과정 ,

7.

(1993) 한글의 글자꼴이 가독성에 미치는 영향,

8.

(1979) Models of word recognition,

9.

(1997) Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities. ,

10.

(2003) Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers,

11.

(1994) A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception Further investigations of the word-superiority effect Journal of Experimental Psychology,

12.

(2003) Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers,

13.

(1987) The psychology of reading,

14.

(2002) The role of orthographic and phonological codes in the word and the pseudoword superiority effect: An analysis by means of multinomial processing tree models,

15.

(1995) Word superiority in Chinese,

16.

(1976) Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords Journal of Experimental Psychology,

17.

(1986) The programmable blackboard model of reading Exploration in the microstructure of cognition, MIT Press

18.

(1977) The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords,

19.

(1988) Some tests of the interactive-activation model for word identification,

20.

(1982) An activation and verification model for letter and word recognition,

21.

(2001) Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task.,

22.

(1969) Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material,

23.

(1982) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model,

24.

(1979) Lexical access via an orthographic code Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,

25.

(1973) Divided attention to ear and eye,

26.

(1981) The joint effects of input and output modality competition,

27.

(1970) Processes in word recognition,

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy