바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Interocular Filling-in of the Blind Spot

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2007, v.19 no.3, pp.221-231
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2007.19.3.003



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

We have a blind spot for each eye that cannot receive visual inputs. Nonetheless, we do not experience empty space because of filling-in phenomena. Although many studies suggested that neighboring information around the blind spot contributed to filling-in of the blind spot, there has been few studies that investigated contribution from the other eye's information and its interaction with neighboring information. Our study investigated whether the opposite eye's information could contribute to filling-in process of the blind spot. We also investigated, between the opposite eye's and neighboring information, which information was more dominant in the process of filling-in. We found that the blind spot could be filled by the opposite eye's information and that information was more dominant in filling-in of the blind spot. These results were observed only in the blind spot.

keywords
맹점, 채워넣기 과정, 양안 경합, blind spot, filling-in process, binocular rivalry

Reference

1.

Blake, R., (2001). A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies. Brain and Mind, 2, 5-38.

2.

Blake, R., Fox, R. & McIntyre, C. (1971). Stochastic properties of stabilized-image binocular rivalry alternations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 327 – 332.

3.

Blake, R., O'Shea, R. P., & Mueller, T. J. (1992). Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision, Visual Neuroscience, 8, 469-478.

4.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433 - 436.

5.

Fox, R. & Herrmann, J. (1967). Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations, Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 432 – 436.

6.

Goldstein, E. B. (1989). Sensation and Perception. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, USA: New York.

7.

He, S. & Davis, W. L. (2001). Filling-in at the natural blind spot contributes to binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 41, 835 - 840.

8.

Komatsu, H. (2006). The neural mechanisms of perceptual filling-in. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 220 - 231.

9.

Komatsu, H., Kinoshita, M. & Murakami, I. (2000). Neural responses in the Retinotopic Representation of the blind spot in the macaque V1 to stimuli for perceptual filling-in. The journal of Neuroscience, 20 (24), 9310 - 9319.

10.

Komatsu, H., Kinoshita, M. & Murakami, I. (2002). Neural responses in the primary visual cortex of the monkey during perceptual filling-in at the blind spot. Neuroscience Research, 44, 231 - 236.

11.

Levelt, W. (1965). On binocular rivalry. Mouton: Hague.

12.

Matsumoto, M. & Komatsu, H. (2005). Neural responses in the macaque V1 to bar stimuli with various lengths presented on the blind spot. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 2374- 2387.

13.

Murakami, I. (1995). Motion aftereffect after monocular adaptation to filled-in motion at the blind spot. Vision Research, 35 (8), 1041 - 1045.

14.

Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437 - 442.

15.

Pessoa, L., Thompson, E., Noe, A. (1998). Finding out about filling-in: a guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 723 - 748.

16.

Teller, D. Y., Morse, R., Borton, R. & Regal, D. (1974). Visual acuity for vertical and diagonal gratings in human infants. Vision Research, 14, 1433 - 1439.

17.

Tripathy, S. P. & Levi, D. M. (1994). Long-range dichoptic interactions in the human visual cortex in the region corresponding to the blind spot. Vision Research, 34 (9), 1127 - 1138.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology