바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.2

Citation Share

Effects of Association to an Unfamiliar Form on the Perception of Unattended form

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.2, pp.161-176
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.003


& (2010). Effects of Association to an Unfamiliar Form on the Perception of Unattended form. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22(2), 161-176, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.003

Abstract

Two experiments examined the relationship between attention capacity and shape perception. In Experiment 1, participants performed an incidental learning task in which they evaluated an attended shape with one of two associability instructions, while ignoring an unattended shape. The difficulty of the target shape was also varied in two conditions, overlapped in a few versus multiple places. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the participants in all conditions showed perception of the unattended novel form. To control participants' intention implementation, a sequential associability instruction was used in Experiment 2. Three of all four conditions showed evidence for perception of unattended form. No significant correlation between attended and unattended shape recognition rates in two experiments was observed. These findings suggest that residual capacity is responsible for perception of the unattended form.

keywords
낯선 형태, 중첩 자극, 연상성, 중첩인상, 주의 용량, 무주의맹, overlapping novel figure, associability, overlap complexity, attention capacity, inattention blindness

Reference

1.

김일국 (2005). Effects of dynamic allocation of capacity on the negative priming effect. 석사학위 청구논문. 서울대학교.

2.

송유설 (2009). 무주의 상태에서 낯선 형태가 지각되는가. 석사학위 청구논문. 서울대학교.

3.

조현욱, 김정오 (2010). 표적 형태의 내적/외적 구조의 약호화가 무주의 형태의 지각에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22, 59-73.

4.

Baddely, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower(Ed), The psychology of learning and motivation(vol. 8, pp17-90): Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

5.

Bruner, J. Goodnow, J., & Austin, A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.

6.

Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.

7.

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.

8.

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. NJ; Prentice-Hall.

9.

Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent: Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-913.

10.

Rock, I., & Gutman, D. (1981). The effect ot inattention on form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 275-285.

11.

Song, J. H. & Kim, J.-O. (2000). The effect of stimulus-dependent capacity allocation on negative priming. The 20th Summer Conference in the Korean Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Association.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy