바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.4

Citation Share

Phantom Motion and its Aftereffect could produce Motion Induced Blindness

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.4, pp.435-449
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.4.001


& (2010). Phantom Motion and its Aftereffect could produce Motion Induced Blindness. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22(4), 435-449, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.4.001

Abstract

Motion-induced blindness (MIB) is a phenomenon, where salient and stationary objects in full view disappear and reappear intermittently, superimposed onto a background of coherent, apparent global moving pattern(Bonneh, Cooperman, Sagi, 2001). It was investigated whether there was MIB under Motion Aftereffect (Exp. 1), moving phantom (Exp. 2), and Phantom Motion Aftereffect (Exp. 3). In Experiment 1, a perceptual-disappearance of targets under MAE was observed. In Experiment 2, similar to the stimulus pattern of Snowden and Milne(1997)'s study, motion was presented in two quarters of circle area which were facing each other. As a result, MIB was observed not only at the motion area(present moving stimuli), but also the blank area(no moving stimuli). In Experiment 3, MIB was observed under phantom MAE(Snowden & Milne, 1997), even though not strong. In conclusion, first, a motion like MAE could induce MIB. Second MIB could be experienced at empty area near to motion-occurring field. Therefore, it is suggested that it is important internal motion signal for MIB, regardless of its origin: real motion vs. motion aftereffect. In addition, there must be a close relationship between MIB and motion signal which is generated by MAE and/or wide-field motion.

keywords
운동유도맹시, 운동잔여효과, 팬텀 운동, 팬텀운동잔여효과, 전역 운동, Motion Induced Blindness, Motion Aftereffect, Phantom Motion Aftereffect, Wide-field Motion

Reference

1.

류경주, 감기택, 정찬섭 (2004). 가현운동 경로에서 발생되는 채움의 시공간적인 특성. 한국심리학회지: 실험 16(1), 1-21.

2.

이고은, 남종호 (2008). 운동유도맹시현상을 유발하는 전역적 운동과 운동잔여효과. 한국실험심리학회 2008년 겨울학술대회 2월 1일. 서울: 이화여자대학교.

3.

전지원, 남종호 (2007). 자극의 형태 속성 관계가 운동잔여효과에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 실험 19(1), 1-19.

4.

Barlow, H. B., & Hill, R. M. (1963). Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall illusion and figural after-effect. Nature, 200, 1345-1347.

5.

Bonneh, Y. S., Cooperman, A., & Sagi, D. (2001). Motion-induced blindness in normal observers. Nature, 411, 798-801.

6.

Carter, O. L., Pettigrew, J. D. (2003). A common oscillator for perceptual rivalry. Perception, 32, 609-611.

7.

Carter, O. L., Pettigrew, J. D., Burr, D. C., Alais, D., Hasler, F., & Vollenweider, F. X. (2004) Psilocybin impairs high-level but not low-level motion mechanisms perception. NeuroReport, 15, 1947-1951.

8.

Funk, A. P., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2003). Does interhemispheric competition mediate motion- induced blindness? A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Perception, 32, 1328-1338.

9.

Graf, E. W., Adams, W. J., & Lages, M. (2002). Modulating motion-induced blindness with depth ordering and surface completion. Vision Research, 42, 2731-2735.

10.

Gregory, R. (1966). Eye and brain. New York: McGraw-Hill.

11.

Hofstoetter, C., Koch, C., & Kiper, D. C. (2004). Motion-induced blindness does not affect the formation of negative afterimages. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 691-708.

12.

Hsu L. C., Yeh, S. L., & Kramer, P. (2004). Linking motion-induced blindness to perceptual filling-in. Vision Research, 44, 2857-2866.

13.

Hsu L. C., Yeh, S. L., & Kramer, P. (2006). A common mechanism for perceptual filling-in and motion induced blindness. Vision Research, 46, 1973-1981.

14.

Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1997). Functional architecture of macaque monkey cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 198, 1-59.

15.

Lages, Adams, & Graf (2009). Motion-aftereffect -induced blindness. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-7.

16.

Miller, S. M., Liu, G. B., Ngo, T. T., Hooper, G., Riek, S., Carson, R. G., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2000). Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry. Current Biology, 10, 383-392.

17.

Milner & Goodale (1995). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18.

Mitroff, S. R., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). Forming and updating object representations without awareness: Evidence from motion-induced blindness. Vision Research, 45, 961-967.

19.

Snowden, R. J., & Milne, A. B. (1997). Phantom motion aftereffects - evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow. Current Biology, 7(10), 717-722.

20.

Wade, N. J. & Verstraten, A. J. (1998). Introduction and Historical Overview. in Mather, G., Verstraten, F., & Anstis, S. (Eds.), The Motion Aftereffect (pp.1-23). MA: The MIT Press.

21.

Weisstein, N., Maguire, W., & Berbaum, K. (1997). A Phantom-Motion Aftereffect. Science, 198(4320), 955-958.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy