바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

다음
논문 투고

Vol.23 No.3
Citation Share

한글 음절 이웃 효과에서 한자어 형태소의 영향: 표기 및 음운 이웃과 한자어 이웃과의 관련성 중심으로

The Relationship Between Morphological Family Size and Syllabic Neighborhoods Density in Korean Visual Word Recognition

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2011, v.23 no.3, pp.301-319
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.3.001
권유안 (고려대학교)
남기춘 (고려대학교)
권유안, & 남기춘. (2011). 한글 음절 이웃 효과에서 한자어 형태소의 영향: 표기 및 음운 이웃과 한자어 이웃과의 관련성 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 23(3), 301-319, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.3.001
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구는 두 개의 어휘 판단 과제를 통해 음운 및 표기 이웃 효과에 한자어 형태소 효과가 개입되어 있는지 아닌지를 검증하였다. 과거 한글 음절 이웃 효과 연구들에는 한자어 형태소 요인을 통제하지 않았기 때문에 음절 이웃 효과를 유발 시키는 주요 정보가 음운인지 표기인지 불확실 했다. 실험 1에서 표기 이웃 크기를 고정한 상태에서 음운 이웃 크기와 한자어 이웃 크기 간 관련성을 검증하였다. 실험 1 결과 음운 이웃이 크고 한자어 이웃이 큰 경우가 한자어 이웃이 작은 경우에 비해 어휘 판단 시간이 감소하였다. 실험 2는 음운 이웃 크기를 고정한 상태에서 표기 이웃 크기와 한자어 이웃 크기 간의 관련성을 검증하였다. 실험 2 결과 표기 이웃 크기와 한자어 이웃 크기 간의 관련성이 나타났지만 실험 1 결과와는 다른 관련성이 나타났다. 논의에서 한글 음절 이웃 효과 연구에서 필수적으로 한자어 형태소를 고려 할 것을 제안하였고 음절 이웃 효과를 유발하는 정보가 음운인지 표기인지를 논의하였다.

keywords
visual word recognition, syllabic neighborhood size effect, morphological family size effect, 시각 단어 재인, 표기 음절, 음운 음절, 음절 이웃 효과, 표기 이웃 효과, 한자어 이웃 효과

Abstract

Previous studies on syllabic neighborhood effects had not considered the effects of morphological family size which could reduce inhibitory effects that take place as the size of syllabic neighborhood increases. The present study investigated whether the large morphological family size reduces the neighborhood size effect in phonological syllables or in orthographic syllables. Two lexical decision tasks were conducted to examine this issue. The result of Experiment 1 revealed that large morphological family size led to the decrease in inhibitory effects as the size of phonological syllable neighborhoods increased. However, in Experiment 2, while the morphological family size had no effect in the reduction of lexical decision latency, the lexical decision latency increased for large orthographic syllable neighborhoods. The implications of different morphological family size influence on phonological and orthographic neighborhood size effects are discussed in the present study.

keywords
visual word recognition, syllabic neighborhood size effect, morphological family size effect, 시각 단어 재인, 표기 음절, 음운 음절, 음절 이웃 효과, 표기 이웃 효과, 한자어 이웃 효과

참고문헌

1.

권유안, 조혜숙, 김충명, 남기춘 (2006). 한국어 시각단어재인에서 나타나는 이웃효과. 말소리, 60, 29-45.

2.

배성봉, 이광오 (2010). 한국어 단어 재인에서 표기 음절과 음운 음절의 처리. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22(3), 369-385.

3.

이광오, 정진갑, 이광오 (2009). 표기 체계와 시각적 단어 인지: 한자어 인지에서 형태소의 표상과 처리. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 19(4), 313-327.

4.

이승복, 한기선 (2003). 언어심리학. 서울: 시그마 프레스.

5.

Álvarez, C., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? Language & Cognitive Processes. 19, 321-331.

6.

Álvarez, C., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 27 (2), 545-555.

7.

Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood size effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814.

8.

Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234-254.

9.

Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105 (4), 678-723.

10.

Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 15, 545-.548.

11.

Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2002). Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbours in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1228-.1242.

12.

Carreiras, M., Alvarez, J. C., & De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766-780.

13.

Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable-frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19 (3), 369-390.

14.

Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., Tamm. S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Syllables and bigrams: orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different Processing Levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35 (2), 461-479.

15.

Conrad, M., Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007), Phonology as the source of syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from French. Memory & Cognition, 35 (5), 974-983.

16.

Davis, C., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in english: Evidence for lexical inhibition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32 (3), 668-687.

17.

De Jong, N. H., Feldman, L. B., Schreuder, R., Pastizzo, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: peripheral morphological and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language, 81, 555-567.

18.

De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329–365.

19.

Fera, P., & Besner, D. (1992). The process of lexical decision: More words about a parallel distributed processing model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 749-764.

20.

Goslin, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). Syllable frequency effects in French visual word recognition: an ERP study, Brain Research. 1115, 121-134.

21.

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103 (3), 518-565.

22.

Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A (6), 981-98.

23.

Hutzler, F., Bergmann, J., Conrad, M., Kronbichler, M., Stenneken, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: an event-related potential study, Neuroscience Letters. 372, 179-184.

24.

Kwon, Y., Lee, C., Lee., K., & Nam, K. (2011). The inhibitory effect of phonological syllables, rather than orthographic syllables, as evidenced in Korean lexical decision tasks. Psychologia, 54, 1-14.

25.

Kwon, Y., Lee, Y., & Nam, K. (2011). The different P200 effects of phonological and orthographic syllable frequency in visual word recognition in Korean. Neuroscience Letters, 501, 117-121.

26.

Mathey, S., & Zagar, D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior Brain & Cognition, 8, 107–121.

27.

Mathey, S., Zagar, D., Doignon, N., & Seigneuric, A. (2006). The nature of the syllabic neighborhoods effect in French. Acta Psychologica, 123, 372-393.

28.

Nelson, D. L., Bennett, D. J., Gee, N. R., & Schreiber, T. A. (1993). Implicit memory: Effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 747-764.

29.

Rapp, B. C. (1992). The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 33-53.

30.

Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.

31.

Seidenberg, M. S., Petersen, A., MacDonald, M. C., & Plaut, D. C. (1996). Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 48-62.

32.

Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of visual word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96 (4), 523-568.

33.

Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Eds.), Morphological Aspects of Langauge Processing. LEA.

34.

Yates, M. (2005). Phonological Neighbors Speed Visual Word Processing: Evidence From Multiple Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31 (6), 1385-1397.

35.

Yates, M., Locker, L., & Simpson, G. (2003). Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones. Memory & Language, 31 (6), 856-866.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책