바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.23 No.3

Citation Share

The Relationship Between Morphological Family Size and Syllabic Neighborhoods Density in Korean Visual Word Recognition

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2011, v.23 no.3, pp.301-319
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.3.001


& (2011). The Relationship Between Morphological Family Size and Syllabic Neighborhoods Density in Korean Visual Word Recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 23(3), 301-319, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.3.001

Abstract

Previous studies on syllabic neighborhood effects had not considered the effects of morphological family size which could reduce inhibitory effects that take place as the size of syllabic neighborhood increases. The present study investigated whether the large morphological family size reduces the neighborhood size effect in phonological syllables or in orthographic syllables. Two lexical decision tasks were conducted to examine this issue. The result of Experiment 1 revealed that large morphological family size led to the decrease in inhibitory effects as the size of phonological syllable neighborhoods increased. However, in Experiment 2, while the morphological family size had no effect in the reduction of lexical decision latency, the lexical decision latency increased for large orthographic syllable neighborhoods. The implications of different morphological family size influence on phonological and orthographic neighborhood size effects are discussed in the present study.

keywords
visual word recognition, syllabic neighborhood size effect, morphological family size effect, 시각 단어 재인, 표기 음절, 음운 음절, 음절 이웃 효과, 표기 이웃 효과, 한자어 이웃 효과

Reference

1.

권유안, 조혜숙, 김충명, 남기춘 (2006). 한국어 시각단어재인에서 나타나는 이웃효과. 말소리, 60, 29-45.

2.

배성봉, 이광오 (2010). 한국어 단어 재인에서 표기 음절과 음운 음절의 처리. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22(3), 369-385.

3.

이광오, 정진갑, 이광오 (2009). 표기 체계와 시각적 단어 인지: 한자어 인지에서 형태소의 표상과 처리. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 19(4), 313-327.

4.

이승복, 한기선 (2003). 언어심리학. 서울: 시그마 프레스.

5.

Álvarez, C., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? Language & Cognitive Processes. 19, 321-331.

6.

Álvarez, C., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 27 (2), 545-555.

7.

Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood size effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814.

8.

Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234-254.

9.

Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105 (4), 678-723.

10.

Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 15, 545-.548.

11.

Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2002). Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbours in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1228-.1242.

12.

Carreiras, M., Alvarez, J. C., & De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766-780.

13.

Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable-frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19 (3), 369-390.

14.

Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., Tamm. S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Syllables and bigrams: orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different Processing Levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35 (2), 461-479.

15.

Conrad, M., Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007), Phonology as the source of syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from French. Memory & Cognition, 35 (5), 974-983.

16.

Davis, C., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in english: Evidence for lexical inhibition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32 (3), 668-687.

17.

De Jong, N. H., Feldman, L. B., Schreuder, R., Pastizzo, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: peripheral morphological and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language, 81, 555-567.

18.

De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329–365.

19.

Fera, P., & Besner, D. (1992). The process of lexical decision: More words about a parallel distributed processing model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 749-764.

20.

Goslin, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). Syllable frequency effects in French visual word recognition: an ERP study, Brain Research. 1115, 121-134.

21.

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103 (3), 518-565.

22.

Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A (6), 981-98.

23.

Hutzler, F., Bergmann, J., Conrad, M., Kronbichler, M., Stenneken, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: an event-related potential study, Neuroscience Letters. 372, 179-184.

24.

Kwon, Y., Lee, C., Lee., K., & Nam, K. (2011). The inhibitory effect of phonological syllables, rather than orthographic syllables, as evidenced in Korean lexical decision tasks. Psychologia, 54, 1-14.

25.

Kwon, Y., Lee, Y., & Nam, K. (2011). The different P200 effects of phonological and orthographic syllable frequency in visual word recognition in Korean. Neuroscience Letters, 501, 117-121.

26.

Mathey, S., & Zagar, D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior Brain & Cognition, 8, 107–121.

27.

Mathey, S., Zagar, D., Doignon, N., & Seigneuric, A. (2006). The nature of the syllabic neighborhoods effect in French. Acta Psychologica, 123, 372-393.

28.

Nelson, D. L., Bennett, D. J., Gee, N. R., & Schreiber, T. A. (1993). Implicit memory: Effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 747-764.

29.

Rapp, B. C. (1992). The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 33-53.

30.

Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.

31.

Seidenberg, M. S., Petersen, A., MacDonald, M. C., & Plaut, D. C. (1996). Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 48-62.

32.

Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of visual word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96 (4), 523-568.

33.

Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Eds.), Morphological Aspects of Langauge Processing. LEA.

34.

Yates, M. (2005). Phonological Neighbors Speed Visual Word Processing: Evidence From Multiple Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31 (6), 1385-1397.

35.

Yates, M., Locker, L., & Simpson, G. (2003). Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones. Memory & Language, 31 (6), 856-866.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy