바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Neighborhood Effects in Hangul Word Recognition

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2011, v.23 no.4, pp.639-651
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.4.010

Abstract

Coltheart, Davelaar, Jonasson, & Besner (1977) insisted that word recognition can be regulated by the number and frequency of neighbors, which are defined as words that have the same length as a word in question and have only one different letter. The present study adopted the progressive demasking method to collect error responses that could reveal competing neighbors of a stimulus word. The collected errors were analysed to find clues to how to define neighborhood in the processing of Korean bisyllabic words. The results obtained were different from what was assumed by Coltheart et al. First, Kulja type as well as letter was found to be critical in activating neighbors. Initial letter was more important than middle and final letters in a syllable. However, semantic effects were not significant implying that orthographic factors prevails in the initial stage of word recognition, which is consistent with Coltheart et al. In sum, the results suggest that orthographic neighbors in Korean word recognition should be defined in multiple dimensions using strokes, letters, Kuljas, Kulja types, and so forth.

keywords
단어 재인, 이웃, 한글, 글자 유형, word recognition, neighborhood, Hangul, Kulja type

Reference

1.

권유안, 남기춘 (2007). 한국어 시각단어재인에서 의미 이웃크기 효과. 대한음성학회, 한국음성과학회 공동학술대회 발표논문집, 173-175.

2.

권유안, 남기춘 (2011). 한글 음절 이웃 효과에서 한자어 형태소의 영향: 표기 및 음운 이웃과 한자어 이웃과의 관련성 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 23, 301- 319.

3.

권유안, 박창수, 남기춘 (2006). 한국어 시각 단어 재인에서 음운, 철자이웃 크기 효과. 한국인지과학회 춘계학술대회 논문집, 47- 51.

4.

권유안, 조혜숙, 김충명, 남기춘 (2006). 한국어 시각단어재인에서 나타나는 이웃효과. 말소리, 60, 29-45.

5.

권유안, 조혜숙, 남기춘 (2006). 한국어 단어재인에서 나타나는 이웃효과. 대한음성학회 춘계 학술대회 발표논문집, 117-120.

6.

조혜숙, 남기춘 (2002). 한국어 단어재인의 이웃(neighborhood) 단위. 대한음성학회 학술대회지, 97-100.

7.

이광오, 배성봉 (2009). 한국어 고유어의 인지에서 형태소 처리. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 21, 233-247.

8.

이광오, 이인선 (1999). 한글단어의 인지과정에서 형태소 정보처리. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 11, 77-91.

9.

Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814.

10.

Dufau, S., Stevens, M., & Grainger, J. (2008). Windows executable software for the progressive demasking task. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 33-37.

11.

Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp.535-555). New York: Academic Press.

12.

Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.

13.

Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 191-198.

14.

Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 981-998.

15.

Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2011). Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 129–134.

16.

Mathey, S., & Zagar, D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior Brain & Cognition, 8, 107-121.

17.

Mathey, S., Zagar, D., Doignon, N., & Seigneuric, A. (2006). The nature of the syllabic neighborhoods effect in French. Acta Psychologica, 123, 372-393.

18.

Miller, G. A. (1991). The science of words. NY: Scientific American Libaray.

19.

Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with non-adjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.

20.

Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., and Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of experimental psychology, 21, 876-900.

21.

Yates, M., Locker, L., & Simpson, G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 452-457.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology