바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.24 No.3

Citation Share

생각회피 훈련을 통한 의도적 망각에서 항목 강도와 연합 강도의 효과

Effects of Item vs. Associative Strength on Intentional Forgetting in the Think/No-think Paradigm

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2012, v.24 no.3, pp.231-250
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.3.002
홍유림 (연세대학교 심리학과)
이도준 (연세대학교)
홍유림, & 이도준. (2012). 생각회피 훈련을 통한 의도적 망각에서 항목 강도와 연합 강도의 효과. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 24(3), 231-250, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.3.002

초록

본 연구는 원하지 않는 기억의 인출을 인지적으로 억제할 수 있다는 사실을 실험적으로 증명한 생각/생각회피 패러다임(think/no-think paradigm)을 사용하여 1) 표적 항목의 기억 강도가 높을수록 인지적 억제가 촉진되어 망각이 잘 발생하고 2) 반면에 단서와 표적의 연합 강도가 높으면 간섭이 약화되어 망각이 덜 발생할 가능성을 검증하였다. 실험 1에서는 표적 항목의 기억 강도를 조작하기 위해 부정적이거나 중립적인 정서가를 가진 단어들을 사용하고, 사전 연합 학습 단계의 훈련 수준에 따라 단서와 표적 간 연합 강도의 세기를 구분하였다. 그 결과, 중성적인 표적에 비해 부정적인 표적에 대한 망각이 회피 조건에서 더 크게 발생하였다. 또한 표적이 사전 학습 단계에서 학습이 잘 되었을수록 망각이 덜 발생하였다. 실험 2에서는 표적 대신 단서의 정서가를 조작함으로써 단어쌍의 연합 강도를 실험 1과 같게 유지한 채 표적 항목의 기억 강도는 조건별 차이가 나지 않도록 하였다. 그 결과, 사전 학습의 효과는 재현되었지만 단서의 정서가는 표적의 망각에 영향을 끼치지 않았다. 이러한 결과는 항목 자체가 가지는 기억 강도와 항목들 간의 연합 강도가 각각 억제와 간섭을 통해 독립적으로 의도적 망각에 상반된 효과를 유발할 수 있음을 증명한다.

keywords
생각/생각회피 과제, 의도적 망각, 인지적 조절, 억제, 간섭, think/no-think paradigm, intentional forgetting, cognitive control, inhibition, interference

Abstract

The present study hypothesized 1) that the forgetting effects would be greater for targets with strong item memory strength because the item to be forgotten is clear and easily accessed by cognitive control process, 2) the forgetting effects would be lesser for the cue-target pairs with strong associative memory strength because the effect of interference from other competitive stimuli associated with the cue is relatively smaller using think/no-think (TNT) paradigm demonstrated the facts that unwanted memory can be forgotten intentionally. In Experiment 1, target stimuli had either emotional or neutral content to adjust item memory strength of the target while cue-target pairs were distinguished based on the associative memory strength between cue and target words during a training phase. Results indicated an enhancing effect on the think condition and suppressing effect on the no-think condition following repeated practice given the target contained negative valence rather than neutral valence. In addition, greater suppression was observed when cue-target pairs contained weak associative memory strength. In Experiment 2, instead of targets, the valence of cues was changed to adjust the item memory strength of cue stimuli while maintaining the level of associative memory strength between cue-target pairs. The associative memory strength effect depending on the training level in the learning phase was almost the same as in Experiment 1, but there was no significant difference between valences of cues. The finding indicates that the item memory strength and the associative memory strength have opposite effects on intentional forgetting by the inhibition and interference mechanism respectively.

keywords
생각/생각회피 과제, 의도적 망각, 인지적 조절, 억제, 간섭, think/no-think paradigm, intentional forgetting, cognitive control, inhibition, interference

참고문헌

1.

Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(4), 415-445.

2.

Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063-1087.

3.

Anderson, M. C., & Green, C. (2001). Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control. Nature, 410(6826), 366-369.

4.

Anderson, M. C., Ochsner, K. N., Kuhl, B., Cooper, J., Robertson, E., Gabrieli, S. W., Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004). Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science, 303(5655), 232-235.

5.

Bergstrom, Z. M., de Fockert, J. W., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2009). ERP and behavioural evidence for direct suppression of unwanted memories. Neuroimage, 48(4), 726- 737.

6.

Bergstrom, Z. M., Velmans, M., de Fockert, J., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2007). ERP evidence for successful voluntary avoidance of conscious recollection. Brain Research, 1151, 119-133.

7.

Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2003). Intentional forgetting can increase, not decrease, residual influences of to-be-forgotten information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29(4), 524-531.

8.

Bjork, R. A. (1970). Positive forgetting: The noninterference of items intentionally forgotten. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 255-268.

9.

Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., Millar, N., Bonham- Carter, C., Fergusson, E., Jenkins, J., & Parr, M. (1997). Attentional biases for emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion, 11, 25-42.

10.

Bradley, M. M. (1994). Emotional memory: A dimensional analysis. In S. H. M. van Goozen & N. E. van de Poll (Eds.), Emotions: Essays on emotion theory. (pp.97-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

11.

Buchanan, T. W., Etzel, J. A., Adolphs, R., & Tranel, D. (2006). The influence of autonomic arousal and semantic relatedness on memory for emotional words. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61(1), 26-33.

12.

Casey, B. J., Trainor, R. J., Orendi, J. L., Schubert, A. B., Nystrom, L. E., Giedd, J. N., Rapoport, J. L. (1997). A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a Go-No-Go task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(6), 835-847.

13.

Depue, B. E., Banich, M. T., & Curran, T. (2006). Suppression of emotional and nonemotional content in memory: Effects of repetition on cognitive control. Psychological Science, 17(5), 441-447.

14.

Dolan, R. J. (2002). Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science, 298(5596), 1191-1194.

15.

Freud, S. (1953). The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. (pp.117-128). New York: Macmillan.

16.

Hardt, O., Einarsson, E. O., & Nader, K. (2010). A bridge over troubled water: Reconsolidation as a link between cognitive and neuroscientific memory research traditions. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 141-167.

17.

Hertel, P. T., & Calcaterra, G. (2005). Intentional forgetting benefits from thought substitution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 484-489.

18.

Joormann, J., Hertel, P. T., Brozovich, F., & Gotlib, I. H. (2005). Remembering the good, forgetting the bad: Intentional forgettng of emotional material in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 640-648.

19.

Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & Cognition, 31(8), 1169-1180.

20.

Kim, K., Yi, D. -J., Yang, E., & Lee, K. -H. (2007). What makes repressors good suppression?: The effect of trait anxiety. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 26(2), 261-277.

21.

Kimball, D. R., Smith, T. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2007). The fSAM model of false recall. Psychological Review, 114(4), 954-993.

22.

Knight, R. T., Staines, W. R., Swick, D., & Chao, L. L. (1999). Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks. Acta Psychologica, 101, 159-178.

23.

Lee, J. L. (2009). Reconsolidation: Maintaining memory relevance. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(8), 413-420.

24.

Maratos, E. J., Allan, K., & Rugg, M. D. (2000). Recognition memory for emotionally negative and neutral words: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 38(11), 1452-1465.

25.

Mecklinger, A., Parra, M., & Waldhauser, G. T. (2009). ERP correlates of intentional forgetting. Brain Research, 1255, 132-147.

26.

Norman, K. A., Newman, E., Detre, G., & Polyn, S. (2006). How inhibitory oscillations can train neural networks and punish competitors. Neural Computation, 18(7), 1577-1610.

27.

Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2008). Forgetting in immediate serial recall: Decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference? Psychological Review, 115(3), 544-576.

28.

Pessoa, L., Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002). Attentional control of the processing of neutral and emotional stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(1), 31-45.

29.

Raaijmakers, J. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.

30.

Roediger, H. L., McDermott, K. B., & Robinson, K. J. (1998). The role of associative processes in creating false memories. In M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & C. Cornoldi (Eds.), Theories of memory. (pp.187-245). Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

31.

Schiller, D., & Phelps, E. A. (2011). Does reconsolidation occur in humans? Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 24.

32.

Talmi, D., & Moscovitch, M. (2004). Can semantic relatedness explain the enhancement of memory for emotional words? Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 742-751.

33.

Tomlinson, T. D., Huber, D. E., Rieth, C. A., & Davelaar, E. J. (2009). An interference account of cue-independent forgetting in the no-think paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(37), 15588-15593.

34.

Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 30(3), 829-841.

35.

Wagner, A. D., Schacter, D. L., Rotte, M., Koutstaal, W., Maril, A., Dale, A. M., Rosen, B. R., Buckner, R. L. (1998). Building memories: Remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science, 281(5380), 1188-1191.

36.

Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., 3rd., & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 5-13.

37.

Weiner, B. (1968). Motivated forgetting and the study of repression. Journal of Personality, 36, 213-234.

38.

Weiner, B., & Reed, H. (1969). Effects of the instructional sets to remember and to forget on short-term retention: Studies of rehearsal control and retrieval inhibition(repression). Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 226-232.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책