바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.27 No.2
Citation Share

Sad but beautiful; Brain responses to aesthetic judgment and emotion appraisal of visual art

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2015, v.27 no.2, pp.231-251
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2015.27.2.008




& (2015). Sad but beautiful; Brain responses to aesthetic judgment and emotion appraisal of visual art. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 27(2), 231-251, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2015.27.2.008
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Appreciation of art involves both cognitive and affective processes. However, the two processes and the neural underpinnings of them have not been differentiated clearly in the previous studies of neuroaesthetics. Moreover, aesthetic experience has often been confounded by positive emotional contents in artworks or positive emotion appraisal. Aesthetic appreciation and accompanying neural activity regarding artworks evoking negative emotion have not been studied extensively. In the current work using fMRI, we investigated whether brain areas involved in aesthetic judgment can be distinguished from those involved in emotion appraisal. We also explored neural correlates of artworks judged as beautiful yet inducing sad emotion. Our results identified brain regions differentially involved in aesthetic judgment and emotion appraisal, despite the widely shared network. Specifically, the medial prefrontal lobe showed greater activation for aesthetic judgment, while areas including the middle frontal gyrus, putamen, middle temporal gyrus, caudate nucleus, and precuneus showed greater activation for emotion appraisal. We also found increased neural activity in areas including the insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), pre-, and post-central gyri in association with perceiving and judging “sad but beautiful” artworks. These results suggest that the two core processes in experiencing art are closely related to each other, but not identical, and that beauty and positive emotion do not always go hand in hand.

keywords
시각 예술, 감상, 미적 판단, 정서 평가, 기능적자기공명영상, 신경미학, visual art, appreciation, aesthetic judgment, emotion appraisal, fMRI, neuroaesthetics

Reference

1.

Belke, B., Leder, H., & Augustin, D. (2006). Mastering style. Effects of explicit style-related information, art knowledge and affective state on appreciation of abstract paintings. Psychology Science, 48(2), 115.

2.

Bernard, Y. (1972). Sex influence in aesthetic behavior. Perceptual and motor skills, 34(2), 663-666.

3.

Blood, A. J., Zatorre, R. J., Bermudez, P., & Evans, A. C. (1999). Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity in paralimbic brain regions. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 382-387.

4.

Bornhövd, K., Quante, M., Glauche, V., Bromm, B., Weiller, C., & Büchel, C. (2002). Painful stimuli evoke different stimulus-response functions in the amygdala, prefrontal, insula and somatosensory cortex: a single-trial fMRI study. Brain, 125(6), 1326.

5.

Bosanquet, B. (2005). A history of aesthetic: Cosimo Classics.

6.

Brown, S., Gao, X., Tisdelle, L., Eickhoff, S., & Liotti, M. (2011). Naturalizing aesthetics: Brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. Neuroimage, 58(1), 250-258.

7.

Cela-Conde, C. J., Agnati, L., Huston, J. P., Mora, F., & Nadal, M. (2011). The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation. Progress in Neurobiology, 94, 39-48.

8.

Cela-Conde, C. J., Ayala, F. J., Munar, E., Maestú, F., Nadal, M., Capó, M. A., del Río, D., López-Ibor, J. J., Ortiz, T., Mirasso, C., & Marty, G. (2009). Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(10), 3847-3852.

9.

Cela-Conde, C. J., Marty, G., Maestú, F., Ortiz, T., Munar, E., Fernández, A., Roca, M., Rosselló, J., & Quesney, F. (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(16), 6321-6325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401427101

10.

Chatterjee, A. (2003). Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics, Bulletin of Psychology and Arts, 4, 55-60.

11.

Conway, B. R., & Rehding, A. (2013). Neuroaesthetics and the Trouble with Beauty. PLoS Biology, 11(3): e1001504. doi:10.1371/ journal.pbio.1001504

12.

Cupchik, G. C., Vartanian, O., Crawley, A., & Mikulis, D. J. (2009). Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain and Cognition, 70(1), 84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003

13.

Delgado, M. R., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, C., Noll, D., & Fiez, J. A. (2000). Tracking the hemodynamic responses to reward and punishment in the striatum. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84(6), 3072-3077.

14.

Di Dio, C., Macaluso, E., & Rizzolatti, G. (2007). The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS One, 2(11), e1201.

15.

Di Dio, C., & Vittorio, G. (2009). Neuroaesthetics: a review. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19(6), 682-687. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.001

16.

Freedberg D, & Gallese V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 197-203.

17.

Harrison, B. J., Pujol, J., Ortiz, H., Fornito, A., Pantelis, C., & Yücel, M. (2008). Modulation of brain resting-state networks by sad mood induction. PLoS One, 3(3), e1794.

18.

Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2013). The brain's specialized systems for aesthetic and perceptual judgment. European Journal of Neuroscience, 37(9), 1413-1420.

19.

Jacobs, R. H. A. H., Renken, R., & Cornelissen, F. W. (2012). Neural correlates of visual aesthetics - beauty as the coalescence of stimulus and internal state. PLoS One, 7(2): e31248. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031248

20.

Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R. I., Hofel, L., & Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroimage, 29(1), 276-285.

21.

Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural Correlates of Beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(4), 1699-1705. doi: 10.1152/jn.00696.2003

22.

Kim, S., & Hamann, S. (2007). Neural correlates of positive and negative emotion regulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 776- 798.

23.

Knutson, B., Westdorp, A., Kaiser, E., & Hommer, D. (2000). fMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. Neuroimage, 12(1), 20-27.

24.

Koelsch, S., Fritz, T., Müller, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Investigating emotion with music: an fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 27(3), 239-250.

25.

Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A. and Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments, British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489-508.

26.

Lee, S., Jung, W. H., Son, J. W., & Jo, S. W. (2011). Neural correlates of the aesthetic experience using the fractal images: an fMRI study. Korean Journal of Emotion and Sensibility, 14(3), 403-414.

27.

Mak, A. K. Y., Hu, Z.-g., Zhang, J. X., Xiao, Z.-w., & Lee, T. M. C. (2009). Neural correlates of regulation of positive and negative emotions: An fMRI study. Neuroscience Letters, 457(2), 101-106. doi: 10.1016/ j.neulet.2009.03.094

28.

Mazoyer, B., Zago, L., Mellet, E., Bricogne, S., Etard, O., Houde, O., Crivello, F., Joiiot, M., Petit, L., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2001). Cortical networks for working memory and executive functions sustain the conscious resting state in man. Brain Research Bulletin, 54, 287-298.

29.

Mitterschiffthaler, M. T., Fu, C. H. Y., Dalton, J. A., Andrew, C. M., & Williams, S. C. R. (2007). A Functional MRI Study of Happy and Sad Affective States Induced by Classical Music. Human Brain Mapping, 28: 1150-1162.

30.

Nadal, M., Munar, E., Capo, M., Rossello, J., & Cela-Conde, C. (2008). Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. Spatial Vision, 21, 3(5), 379-396.

31.

Paulus, M. P., & Frank, L. R. (2003). Ventromedial prefrontal cortex activation is critical for preference judgments. Neuroreport, 14(10), 1311-1315. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr. 0000078543.07662.02

32.

Price, C. J., & Friston, K. J. (1997). Cognitive conjunction: a new approach to brain activation experiments. Neuroimage, 5(4), 261- 270.

33.

Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 98, 676-682.

34.

Rolls, E. T. (2000). Precis of the brain and emotion. Behavioral and brain sciences, 23(2), 177-191.

35.

Sawamoto, N., Honda, M., Okada, T., Hanakawa, T., Kanda, M., Fukuyama, H., Konishi, J., & Shibasaki, H. (2000). Expectation of pain enhances responses to nonpainful somatosensory stimulation in the anterior cingulate cortex and parietal operculum/ posterior insula: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(19), 7438-7445.

36.

Shulman, G. L., Fiez, J. A., Corbetta, M., Buckner, R. L., Miezin, F. M., Raichle, M. E., & Petersen, S. E. (1997). Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: 2. Decreases in cerebral cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 648-663.

37.

Schultz, W., Tremblay, L., & Hollerman, J. R. (2000). Reward processing in primate orbitofrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 272.

38.

Shidara, M., & Richmond, B. J. (2002). Anterior cingulate: single neuronal signals related to degree of reward expectancy. Science, 296 (5573), 1709.

39.

Son, J. -W., Lee, S., Jung, W. -H., Jee, S. H., & Jung, S. H. (2013). What is Neuroaesthetics?: A New Paradigm in Psychiatry. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 52, 3-16.

40.

Stein, M. B., Simmons, A. N., Feinstein, J. S., & Paulus, M. P. (2007). Increased amygdala and insula activation during emotion processing in anxiety-prone subjects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(2), 318-327.

41.

Teasdale, J. D., Howard, R. J., Cox, S. G., Ha, Y., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C. R., & Checkley, S. A. (1999). Functional MRI study of the cognitive generation of affect. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(2), 209-215.

42.

Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2004a). Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. NeuroReport, 15(5), 893.

43.

Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2004b). Emotional pathways in the brain mediate aesthetic preference. Bulletin of Psychology and Arts, 5, 37-42.

44.

Vessel. E. A., Starr, G. G., & Rubin, N. (2013). Art reaches within: aesthetic experience, the self and the defaut mode network. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7:258. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013. 00258

45.

Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J. P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of Us Disgusted in My Insula:: The Common Neural Basis of Seeing and Feeling Disgust. Neuron, 40(3), 655-664.

46.

Wright, P., He, G., Shapira, N., Goodman, W., & Liu, Y. (2004). Disgust and the insula: fMRI responses to pictures of mutilation and contamination. Neuroreport, 15(15), 2347.

47.

Yaxley, S., Rolls, E. T., & Sienkiewicz, Z. J. (1990). Gustatory responses of single neurons in the insula of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 63(4), 689-700.

48.

Zarahn, E., Aguirre, G. K., & D'Esposito, M. (1997). Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. NeuroImage, 5(3), 179-197.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy