바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1226-9654
  • E-ISSN2733-466X
  • KCI

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.27 No.3

Citation Share

한국어 시각 단어 지각시 나타나는 음운 정보의 어휘적 억제

The lexical inhibition of the phonological information in Korean visual word recognition

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2015, v.27 no.3, pp.561-581
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2015.27.3.011
최원일 (Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis)
이창환 (서강대학교)
강진원 (고려대학교)
남기춘 (고려대학교)
최원일, 이창환, 강진원, & 남기춘. (2015). 한국어 시각 단어 지각시 나타나는 음운 정보의 어휘적 억제. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 27(3), 561-581, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2015.27.3.011

Abstract

Two Experiments using a primed lexical decision task investigated what types of linguistic information elicits lexical inhibition during visual word recognition of Korean. We measured participants’ reaction times for this task and three prime-target conditions were used: 1) orthographically related 2) phonologically related and 3) control condition. We attempted to examine how lexical competition occurs when prime words had phonological change and whether the inhibition is modulated by word frequency of prime words (Experiment 1), and investigate whether the lexical competition is modulated by lexical status of the prime stimuli (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, we showed that the reaction times were slower in the phonologically related condition as compared to the control condition, whereas they were faster in the orthographically related condition relative to the control condition. Moreover, this tendency was more noticeable in the low frequency prime condition relative to the high frequency prime condition. However, neither the inhibitory effect by the phonologically related prime nor the facilitative effect of the orthographically related prime were observed in Experiment 2 in which nonword primes were used, suggesting that the inhibitory priming effect is generated due to lexical competition between the prime and the target within a lexical level, not via a pre-lexical level in Korean visual word recognition.

keywords
lexical competition, syllabic priming, phonological change, 어휘적 경쟁, 음절 점화, 음운 변화

참고문헌

1.

Alvarez, C., Carreiras, C., & de Vega, M. (2000). Syllable-frequency effect in visual word recognition: Evidence of sequential processing. Psicológica, 21, 341-374.

2.

Alvarez, C., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 545-555.

3.

Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 439-461.

4.

Bae, S., & Yi K. (2010). Processing of orthography and phonology in Korean word recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22, 369-385.

5.

Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C., & de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766-780.

6.

Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2002). Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1228-1242.

7.

Colombo, L. (1986). Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 226-234.

8.

Conrad, M., Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Phonology as the source of syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from French. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 974-983.

9.

Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 668-687.

10.

Dominguez, A., Vega, M., & de Cuetos, F. (1997). Lexical inhibition from syllabic units in Spanish visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(4), 401-422.

11.

Dufour, S., & Peereman, R. (2003). Inhibitory priming effects in auditory word recognition: when the target’s competitors conflict with the prime word. Cognition, 88, b33-b44.

12.

Evett, L. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 325-350.

13.

Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353-372.

14.

Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(2), 119-122.

15.

Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 365-382.

16.

Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 708-723.

17.

Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). The syllable’s role in word naming. Memory & Cognition, 25, 458-470.

18.

Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighborhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 981-998.

19.

Hamburger, M. B., & Slowiaczek, L. M. (1996). Phonological priming reflects lexical competition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 520-525.

20.

Humphreys, G. W., Besner, D., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Event perception and the word repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 51-67.

21.

Kwon, Y. (2009). The distinct role of phonological and orthographic syllable units in visual word recognition in Korean, Hangul. Doctoral dissertation submitted to the graduate school of Korea University.

22.

Kwon, Y., Cho, H., Kim, C., and Nam, K. (2006). The neighborhood effect in Korean visual word recognition. The Korean Society of Phonetic Sciences and Speech Technology, 60, 29-45.

23.

Kwon, Y., Lee, Y., & Nam, K. (2011). The different P200 effects of phonological and orthographic syllable frequency in visual word recognition in Korean. Neuroscience Letters, 501, 117-121.

24.

Lee, C., & Gough, P. B. (1996). The frequency and length effect in word recognition, Poster presented at the 42nd Southwestern Psychology Association, Houston, Texas.

25.

Lee, H., & Kim, J. (2003). The effects of ease with phonological rules applicability on phonological processing of Korean words and nonwords. The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 425-454.

26.

Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Automatic and pre-lexical computation of phonology in visual word identification. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 325-343.

27.

Lupker, S. J., & Colombo, L. (1994). Inhibitory effects in form priming: Evaluating a phonological competition explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 20(2), 437-451.

28.

Mathey, S., Zagar, D., Doignon, N., & Seigneuric, A. (2006). The nature of the syllable neighborhood effect in French. Acta Psycholigica, 123, 372-393.

29.

McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E., (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375- 407.

30.

McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

31.

Monsell, S., & Hirsh, K. W. (1998). Competitor priming in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1495-1520.

32.

Nam, K., Kim, J., & Seo, C. (2001). Form priming effects in Korean visual word recognition. The Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 13(1), 21-40.

33.

Norris, D. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 517-524.

34.

Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. C. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473-485.

35.

Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Prime word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65-76.

36.

Slowiaczek, L. M., & Hamburger, M. B. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 1239-1250.

37.

Suh, S. (1998). Lexical frequency of modern Korean. Research Center of Linguistic information, Yonsei University, Seoul.

38.

Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7, 263-272.

39.

Yi, K. (1993). On the role of frequency and internal structure in the processing of Kulca, Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 5, 26-39.

40.

Yoshitaka, K., & Kim, J. (2004). Does phonological information primarily mediate access to meaning in visual korean word recognition?, The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(4), 501-516.

41.

Yoshitaka, K., & Kim, J. (2005). The relationship between phonological change rules and phonological codes in hangul word recognition. The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(2), 131-149.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책