바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

다음
논문 투고

Vol.32 No.4
Citation Share

한국어 시각적 단어 재인에서 음절 빈도 효과의 고찰

The Review of Syllable Frequency Effect in Korean Visual Word Recognition

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2020, v.32 no.4, pp.291-303
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2020.32.4.001
권유안 (대구가톨릭대학교)
권유안. (2020). 한국어 시각적 단어 재인에서 음절 빈도 효과의 고찰. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 32(4), 291-303, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2020.32.4.001
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

고빈도 음절 이웃을 가진 단어가 저빈도 음절 이웃을 가진 단어에 비해 어휘 판단 시 실험 참가자의 반응이 더 느려진다. 이러한 억제적 효과를 음절 빈도 효과라고 부른다. 음절 빈도 효과는 시각적 단어 재인 모형의 발전에 중요한 역할을 차지하고 있다. 단어 재인 모형의 타당성을 검증하는데 음절 빈도 효과의 위치는 매우 중요함에도 불구하고 한국어를 이용한 관련 연구의 양은 다른 언어에 비해 매우 적다. 본 논문은 시각적 단어 재인 모형에서 음절 빈도 효과의 역할과 음절 빈도 효과를 다룬 한국어 연구를 소개하였다. 더욱이 본 논문은 한국어가 명확한 음절 경계와 자소 대 음소 대응을 갖고 있음에도 음절 빈도 효과가 명확하지 않은 이유와 기존 모형이 설명할 수 없었던 한국어 단어의 몇 가지 특징을 설명하였다.

keywords
syllable frequency effect, visual word recognition, hanja morpheme, syllable based writing, 음절 빈도 효과, 시각적 단어 재인, 한자 형태소, 모아쓰기

Abstract

Participants who ask for conducting lexical decisions tend to respond more slowly when the presented word have higher frequency syllabic neighbors rather than lower frequency syllabic neighbors. The inhibitory effect is called as the syllable frequency effect. The syllable frequency effect has played an important role in enhancing visual word recognition models. Although the position of the syllable frequency effect is very important in verifying the validity of visual word recognition model, amount of studies using Korean is very low as compared by other languages. The present article explained the role of syllable frequency effect in visual word recognition model and introduced Korean studies dealing with the syllable frequency effect. Moreover, the present paper explained some reasons of why the syllable frequency effect in Korean were not clear even though Korean has clear syllabic boundaries and grapheme to phoneme matching, and the several features of Korean word that the previous model could not account.

keywords
syllable frequency effect, visual word recognition, hanja morpheme, syllable based writing, 음절 빈도 효과, 시각적 단어 재인, 한자 형태소, 모아쓰기

참고문헌

1.

Alvarez, C., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 321-331.

2.

Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 439-461.

3.

Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological review, 105(4), 678-723.

4.

Ashby, J. (2010). Phonology is fundamental in skilled reading:Evidence from ERPs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 95-100.

5.

Bae, S., Yi, K., & Park, H. (2012). Semantic transparency effects in the recognition and learning of Sino-Korean words. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 607-620.

6.

Barber, H. A., & Kutas, M. (2007). Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 98-123.

7.

Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition:evidence from ERPs. Neuroreport, 15(3), 545-548.

8.

Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2002). Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1228-1242.

9.

Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90(1-3), 393-400.

10.

Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J., & De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 766-780.

11.

Carreiras, M., Mechelli, A., & Price, C. J. (2006). Effect of word and syllable frequency on activation during lexical decision and reading aloud. Human Brain Mapping, 27(12), 963-972.

12.

Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition:Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 23(4), 857-871.

13.

Carreiras, M., Riba, J., Vergara, M., Heldmann, M., & Münte, T. F. (2009). Syllable congruency and word frequency effects on brain activation. Human Brain Mapping, 30(9), 3079-3088.

14.

Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Barber, H. (2005). Early event-related potential effects of syllabic processing during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(11), 1803-1817.

15.

Chetail, F., & Mathey, S. (2010). InfoSyll: A syllabary providing statistical information on phonological and orthographic syllables. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(6), 485-504.

16.

Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and performance, volume VI, ed. by S. Dornic, 535-556. Hillsdale, New Jersy: Erlbaum.

17.

Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable-frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369-390.

18.

Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2008). Contrasting effects of token and type syllable frequency in lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(2), 296-326.

19.

Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., Tamm, S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Syllables and bigrams: Orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 461-479.

20.

Conrad, M., Stenneken, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Associated or dissociated effects of syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 339-345.

21.

Conrad, M., Tamm, S., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2010). Simulating syllable frequency effects within an interactive activation framework. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 861-893.

22.

Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 65-70.

23.

Davis, C. J., & Taft, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: In- terference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 904-910.

24.

Doignon, N., & Zagar, D. (2005). Illusory conjunctions in French: The nature of sublexical units in visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(3), 443-464.

25.

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.

26.

Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45(3), 189-195.

27.

Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & O'Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 938-950.

28.

Hutzler, F., Bergmann, J., Conrad, M., Kronbichler, M., Stenneken, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: An event related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 372, 179-184.

29.

Jacobs, A. M., Graf, R., & Kinder, A. (2003). Receiver operating characteristics in the lexical decision task:Evidence for a simple signal-detection process simulated by the multiple read-out model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 481-488.

30.

Jin, R., Lee, H., & Choi, W. (2018). Are they real neighbors?: Null effects of syllabic neighbors in Korean word recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 30(3), 211-223.

31.

Kang, J., Nam, S., Lim, H., & Nam, K. (2016). ERP indices of Korean derivational prefix morphemes separated from the semantic and orthographic information. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 28(3), 409-430.

32.

Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621-647.

33.

Kwon, Y. (2012). The dissociation of syllabic token and type frequency effect in lexical decision task. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 24(4), 315-328.

34.

Kwon, Y. (2014). The syllable type and token frequency effect in naming task. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 25(2), 91-107.

35.

Kwon, Y., Choi, S., & Lee, Y. (2016). Early use of orthographic information in spoken word recognition: event ‐related potential evidence from the Korean language. Psychophysiology, 53(4), 544-552.

36.

Kwon, Y., & Lee, C. (2017). The reason for the absence of the syllable frequency effect in Korean: Behavioral and ERP evidences from morphological syllable. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 19, 465-476.

37.

Kwon, Y., & Lee, Y. (2015). The source of the syllable frequency effect during visual word recognition:event-related brain potential study, The Korean Association of Language Science, 22(4), 1-17.

38.

Kwon, Y., & Nam, K. (2011). The relationship between morphological family size and syllabic neighborhoods density in Korean visual word recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 23(3), 301-319.

39.

Kwon, Y., Choi, H., Kim., C., & Nam, K. (2006). The neighborhood effect in Korean visual word recognition. Malsori(Journal of The Phonetic Society of Korea), 60, 29-45.

40.

Kwon, Y., Lee, Y., & Nam, K. (2011). The different P200effects of phonological and orthographic syllable frequency in visual word recognition in Korean. Neuroscience letters, 501(2), 117-121.

41.

Kwon, Y., Nam, K., & Lee, Y. (2012). ERP index of the morphological family size effect during word recognition. Neuropsychologia, 50(14), 3385-3391.

42.

Kwon, Y., Nam, K., & Lee, Y. (2015). The role of orthographic syllable frequency in the syllable frequency effect: evidence from Korean. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 120(1), 95-109.

43.

Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 530-542.

44.

Lee, C. H., Kwon, Y., Kim, K., & Rastle, K. (2015). Syllable transposition effects in Korean word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(3), 309-315.

45.

Lee, S., Lee, Y., & Kwon, Y. (2017). The influence of morphological type in the syllable frequency effect. Korean Society for Cognitive & Biological Psychology Conference, 42.

46.

Lima, S. D., & Pollatsek, A. (1983). Lexical access via an orthographic code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) reconsidered. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 310-332.

47.

Macizo, P., & Van Petten, C. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295.

48.

Mathey, S., & Zagar, D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior Brain &Cognition, 8, 107-121.

49.

Mathey, S., Zagar, D., Doignon, N., & Seigneuric, A. (2006). The nature of the syllabic neighborhoods effect in French. Acta Psychologica, 123, 372-393.

50.

Mummery CJ, Shallice T, Price CJ (1999): Dual-process model insemantic priming: a functional imaging perspective. Neuroimage, 9, 516-525.

51.

Müller, O., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects:What is shared, what is different?. Psychophysiology, 47(3), 455-466.

52.

Nation Institute of Korean Language Online Q & A [Website]. (2020.04.20.). URL: https://www.korean.go.kr/front/online Qna/onlineQnaView.do?mn_id=216&qna_seq=107547

53.

Norris, D. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 17(10), 517-524.

54.

Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 134-144.

55.

Rossell, S. L., Price, C. J., & Nobre, A. C. (2003). The anatomy and time course of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 41(5), 550-564.

56.

Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of visual word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 4, 523-568.

57.

Shin, J. Y., & Cha, J. E. (2003). Korean sound system. Seoul:Hangukmunwhasa.(신지영. 차재은 (2003). 우리말 소리의 체계. 서울: 한국문화사).

58.

Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(1), 21-39.

59.

Taft, M. (1992). The body of the BOSS: Subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1004-1014.

60.

Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. M. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

61.

Tae, J., Lee, C. H., & Lee, Y. (2015). The effect of the orthographic and phonological priming in Korean visual word recognition. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 26(1), 1-26.

62.

Yates, M., Locker, L., & Simpson, G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 452-457.

63.

Yi, K. (2010). Critiques of research in Hangul information processing. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 9-19.

64.

Yi, K., & Yi, I. (1999). Morphological processing in Korean word recognition. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11(1), 77-91.

65.

Yi, K., Jung, J., & Bae, S. (2007). Writing system and visual word recognition: Morphological representation and processing in Korean. The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19(4), 313-327.

66.

Zagar, D. (2015). Hangul: A fascinating writing system. A comment on Kwon, Nam, and Lee (2015). Perceptual and Motor Skills, 121(2), 461-464.

67.

Ziegler, J. C., & Perry, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68(2), B53-B62.

68.

Ziegler, J. C., Muneaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition:Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(4), 779-793.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책