바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study of Dynamical Characteristics on Learning of the Golf Putting Using Dynamic Approach

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2007, v.19 no.1, pp.77-91
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2007.19.1.005

Abstract

For investigating the dynamic characteristics in learning of the golf putting, the present experiment was conducted from the perspective of the dynamic approach. At Day 1, CM group was instructed to practice putting comfortably under no environmental constraints with their eyes closed(intrinsic dynamics), and TG group was instructed to practice putting under the environmental constraints with their eyes open(required dynamics). The results showed that at Day 3, CM group was more accurate than TG group, however, this difference was vanished at Day 4, and Day 5 with increased practices. Also, there was the learning effect between Days, hence, the performance became more accurate at Day 5. The results, also, showed that at Day 5, the attractor state was changed from the Middle distance condition to the Short, and the Long distance conditions, therefore, indicated the phenomenon of 'self organization'. In sum, the dynamic characteristics in learning of the golf putting was well explained by the dynamic approach.

keywords
다이나믹 접근법, 본질적 역동성, 요구된 역동성, 자기형성, 어트랙터, 골프 퍼팅, dynamic appoach, intrinsic dynamics, required dynamics, self organization, attractor, golf putting

Reference

1.

신미경 (2006). 다이나믹 접근법을 적용한 골프 퍼팅 분석. 한국스포츠리서치, 17(5), 205-214.

2.

Haken, H. (1977). Synergetics. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

3.

Haken, H. (1983). Advanced synergetics. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

4.

Haken, H. & Wunderlin, A. (1990). Synergetics and its paradigm of self-organization in biological systems. In H. T. A. Whiting, O. G. Meijer & P. C. W. Wiringen (Eds.), The Natural Physical Approach to Movement Control. 1-36.

5.

Kelso, J. A. S. (1984). Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, integrative and Comparative Physiology, 15: R1000-R1004

6.

Kelso, J. A. S. (1990). Phase transitions: Foundation of behavior. In H. Haken & M. Stadler (Eds.), Synergetics of cognition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 249-268.

7.

Kelso, J. A. S. (1994). Elementary coordination dynamics. In S. Swinnen, H. Heuer, J. Massion, & P. Casaer (Eds.), Interlimb coordination: Neural, Dynamical, and cognitive constraints (pp. 301-318). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

8.

Kelso, J. A. S., Scholz, J. P., & Schöner, G. (1986). Nonlinear phase transitions in coordinated biological motion: critical fluctuation, Physics letter A, 118(6), 279-284.

9.

Kugler, P. N., Kelso, J. A. S., & Turvey, M. T. (1982). On the control of naturally developing systems. In J. A. S. Kelso & J.E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and coordination (pp. 5-78). New Work: Wiley.

10.

Kugler, P. N., & Turvey, M. T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

11.

Lee, T. D., & Swinnen, S. P. (1993). Three legacies of Bryan and Harter: Automaticity, variability and change in skilled performance. In J. L. Starkes & Allard (Eds.), Cognitive issues in motor expertise (pp. 295-315). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

12.

Lee, T., Swinnen, S. & Verschueren, S. (1995). Relative phase alterations during bimanual skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27 (3), 263-274.

13.

Prigogine, I. & Stenger, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man's new dialogue with nature. New York, NY; Bantam books.

14.

Schöner, G., Haken, H., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1986). A stochastic theory of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics, 53, 247-257.

15.

Schöner, G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1988a). A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination: Ⅰ. Relative phase dynamics. Biological Cybernetics, 58, 71-80.

16.

Schöner, G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1988b). A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination: Ⅱ. Component oscillator dynamics. Biological Cybernetics, 58, 81-89.

17.

Schöner, G. & Kelso, J. A. S. (1988c). Dynamical patterns of biological coordination: Theoretical strategy and new results. In J. A. S. Kelso, A.J. Mandell, & M.F. Schlesinger (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in complex systems (pp. 77-102). Singapore: World Scientific.

18.

Sim, M., Shaw, R. E., & Turvey, M. T. (1997). Intrinsic and required dynamics of a simple bat-ball skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1, 101-115.

19.

Sim, M., Sullivan, J., Shaw, R. E., & Carello, Claudia (1988). A comfort mode analysis of a simple accuracy skill. Paw Review, 3 (2), 35-38.

20.

Smoll, F. L., & Schutz, R. W. (1982). Accuracy of rhythmic motor behavior in response to preferred and non-preferred tempos. Jounal of Human Movement Studies, 8, 123-138.

21.

Sparrow, W. A. (1983). The efficiency of skilled behavior. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 237-261.

22.

Sparrow, W. A., & Irizarry-Lopez, V. M. (1987). Mechanical efficiencies and metabolic cost as measures of learning a novel gross motor task.. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 240-264.

23.

Turvey, M. T. (1990). Coordination. American psychologist, 45, 938-953.

24.

Zannon, P. & Kelso, J. A. S. (1992). Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: Nonequilibrium phase transitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 403-421.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology