바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Monetary Incentives Enhance Attentional Effects on Social and Emotional Judgment

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2007, v.19 no.4, pp.365-382
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2007.19.4.007


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The present study investigated how attentional selection and monetary incentives influence social and emotional judgment on unfamiliar faces and scenes. Attentional selection was modulated with a Go/No-Go task. A transparent color cue was superimposed on the face or scene stimuli. The participants responded when the Go cue appeared and inhibited their responses when the No-Go cue appeared. In the following evaluation task, the participants evaluated the trustworthiness of faces and the beauty of scenes. When monetary incentives were absent, no evaluation bias was observed on the Go trials. Only on the No-Go trials, the participants evaluated the uncued face more trustworthy than the cued one. When monetary incentives were given, however, evaluation bias was observed on both the Go and No-Go trials. On the Go trials, the uncued faces were evaluated less trustworthy and the uncued scenes were evaluated less beautiful. In addition, the participants evaluated the uncued face more trustworthy on the No-Go trials. An additional experiment confirmed that these results were due to attentional enhancement by monetary incentives. These results suggest that evaluation of stimuli can be biased by attention and that monetary incentives can strengthen attentional effects on social and emotional judgment.

keywords
monetary incentives, selective attention, attentional inhibition, social and emotional judgment, 금전적 보상, 선택적 주의, 주의 억제, 사회정서적 판단

Reference

1.

Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 201–271.

2.

Bar, M., Neta, M., & Linz, H. (2006). Very first impression. Emotion, 6(2), 269-278.

3.

Bischot, N. P., & Schall, J. D. (2002). Priming in macaque frontal cortex during popout visual search: Feature-based facilitation and location-based inhibition of return. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(11), 4675-4685.

4.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.

5.

DeSchepper, B., & Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22(1), 27-47.

6.

Fenske, M. J., Raymond, J. E., & Kunar, M. A. (2004). The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1055-1061.

7.

Fenske, M. J., Raymond, J. E., Kessler, K., Westoby, N., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Attentional inhibition has social-emotional consequences for unfamiliar faces. Psychological Science, 16(10), 753-758.

8.

Fenske, M. J., & Raymond, J. E. (2006). Affective influences of selective attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 312-316.

9.

Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 145-173.

10.

Hassin, R., & Trope, Y. (2000). Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 837-852.

11.

Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J.B. Long and A.D. Baddeley (Eds.) Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

12.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theoty: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.

13.

Libera, C. D., & Chelazzi, L. (2006). Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary rewards. Psychological Science, 17(3), 222-227.

14.

Nieuwenhuis, S., Heslenfeld, D. J., von Geusau, N. J., Mars, R. B., Holroyd, C. B., & Yeung, N. (2005). Activity in human reward-sensitive brain areas is strongly context dependent. Neuroimage, 25(4), 1302-1309.

15.

Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R.L. Solso (Ed.) Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

16.

Raymond, J. E., Fenske, M. J., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2003). Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 14(6), 537-542.

17.

Raymond, J. E., Fenske, M. J., & Westoby, N. (2005). Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: A consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1404-1415.

18.

Small, D. M., Gitelman, D., Simmons, K., Bloise, S. M., Parrish, T., & Mesulam, M. -M. (2005). Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-down control of attention. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1855-1865.

19.

Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.

20.

Todorov, A., Gobbini, M. I., Evans, K. K., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Spontaneous retrieval of affective person knowledge in face perception. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 163-173.

21.

Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592-598.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology