바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.21 No.3

Citation Share

Exploring episodic decision variable using adaptive biased feedback procedure: Characteristic of decision axis during recollective judgment

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2009, v.21 no.3, pp.167-189
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2009.21.3.002

(2009). Exploring episodic decision variable using adaptive biased feedback procedure: Characteristic of decision axis during recollective judgment. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 21(3), 167-189, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2009.21.3.002

Abstract

Recognition memory theories have focused on the distinction between single- and dual-process models that characterize episodic retrieval decisions. Dual-process models suggest that episodic decision is contingent on two independent processes: familiarity and recollection. One outstanding question is whether the recollection reflects a distinct categorical mnemonic decision variable or a stricter criterion operation on the graded strength-of-evidence decision axis. The present study examined whether the decision variable of recollective judgment (i.e., “Remember” response) is qualitatively different from familiarity-based response by employing an adaptive biased feedback procedure that was previously used to investigate the lability of decision criterion on the continuous memory trace. The data demonstrated prominent and gradual criterion shifts for Remember response suggesting a continuous characteristics of recollective decision variable but the pattern shows a qualitative difference compared to familiarity-based recognition decisions. A potential model is also discussed.

keywords
Episodic memory decision variable, Recollection, Decision criterion, Biased feedback, Episodic memory decision variable, Recollection, Decision criterion, Biased feedback, 일화기억 의사결정 변인, 회상, 의사결정 준거, 편향된 피드백 절차

Reference

1.

Davachi, L., Mitchell, J., & Wagner, A. (2003). Multiple routes to memory: Distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories. Proceeding of National Academic Sciences: USA, 100, 2157-2162.

2.

Dobbins, I. G., Foley, H., Schacter, D. L., & Wagner, A. D. (2002). Executive control during episodic retrieval: multiple prefrontal processes subserve source memory. Neuron, 35(5), 989-996.

3.

Dobbins, I. G., Rice, H. J., Wagner, A. D., & Schacter, D. L. (2003). Memory orientation and success: Separable neurocognitive components underlying episodic recognition. Neuropsychologia, 41(3), 318-333.

4.

Donaldson, D. I., & Rugg, M. D. (1998). Recognition memory for new associations: Electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection. Neuropsychologia, 36(5), 377-395.

5.

Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition, 24(4), 523-533.

6.

Dunn, J. C. (2004). Remember-know: a matter of confidence. Psychological Review, 111(2), 524-542.

7.

Dunn, J. C. (2008). The dimensionality of the Remember-Know task: A state-trace analysis. Psychological Review, 115(2), 426-446.

8.

Fortin, N., Wright, S., & Eichenbaum, H. (2004). Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus. Nature, 431, 188-191.

9.

Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16(4), 309-313.

10.

Greve, A., Donaldson, D., & van Rossum, M. (in press). A single-trace dual-process models of episodic memory: A novel compulational account of familiarity and recollection. Hippocampus.

11.

Han, S., & Dobbins, I. (2009). Regulating recognition decisions through incremental reinforcement learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 16(3), 469-474.

12.

Han, S., & Dobbins, I. G. (2008). Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased feedback technique: Evidence for a adaptive criterion learning. Memory & Cognition, 36(4), 703-715.

13.

Higham, P. A., & Vokey, J. R. (2004). Illusory recollection and dual-process models of recognition memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A, 57(4), 714-744.

14.

Hirshman, E., & Henzler, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection. Psychological Science, 9(1), 61-65.

15.

Kensinger, E. A., Clarke, R. J., & Corkin, S. (2003). What Neural Correlates Underlie Successful Encoding and Retrieval? A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Using a Divided Attention Paradigm. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(6), 2407-2415.

16.

Knowlton, B. J., Squire, L. R., & Gluck, M. A. (1994). Probabilistic classification learning in amnesia. Learning & Memory, 1(2), 106-120.

17.

Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Mickes, L., Wais, P., & Wixted, J. (2009). Recollection is a continuous process: Implications for dual-process theories of recognition memory. Psychological Science, 20(4), 509-515.

19.

Morrell, H. E., Gaitan, S., & Wixted, J. T. (2002). On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1095-1110.

20.

Nolde, S. F., Johnson, M. K., & D'Esposito, M. (1998). Left prefrontal activation during episodic remembering: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroreport: An International Journal for the Rapid Communication of Research in Neuroscience, 9(15), 3509-3514.

21.

Ranganath, C., Yonelinas, A. P., Cohen, M. X., Dy, C. J., Tom, S. M., & D'Esposito, M. (2004). Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial tempora lobes. Neuropsychologia, 42(1), 2-13.

22.

Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-f., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99(3), 518-535.

23.

Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Reeder, J. A. (2004). Sum-Difference Theory of Remembering and Knowing: A Two-Dimensional Signal-Detection Model. Psychological Review, 111(3), 588-616.

24.

Rotello, C. M., Masson, M. E. J., & Verde, M. (2008). Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(2), 389-401.

25.

Rugg, M. D., Fletcher, P. C., Chua, P. M., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). The role of the prefrontal cortex in recognition memory and memory for source: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 10(5), 520-529.

26.

Stretch, V., & Wixted, J. T. (1998). Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(6), 1397-1410.

27.

Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26(1), 1-12.

28.

Wixted, J. T., & Stretch, V. (2004). In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(4), 616-641.

29.

Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20(6), 1341-1354.

30.

Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25(6), 747-763.

31.

Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 20 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 441-517.

32.

Yonelinas, A. P., Dobbins, I., Szymanski, M. D., Dhaliwal, H. S., & King, L. (1996). Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection. Consciousness & Cognition: An International Journal, 5(4), 418-441.

33.

Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E., Dobbins, I., Lazzara, M., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: convergence of remember-know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data. Neuropsychology, 12(3), 323-339.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy