ISSN : 1226-9654
The present study examined the effects of processing an attended figure on the perception of an unattended figure in a two overlapping novel figure task. Rock & Gutman(1981) reported that unattended figures were rarely recognized because of the absence of attention in this task, which was defined as ‘inattentional blindness’'(IB)'. They also suggested that attention processes both the outer and inner structure of an attended figure. To explore whether attention selectively processes the structural features of a novel figure, thus affecting the perception of an unattended figure, we manipulated attentional capacity by two different instructions, the outer structure coding instruction(OSCI) and the inner structure coding instruction(ISCI). It was assumed that depending upon instructions, recognition rates of unattended figures should be varied as the amount of residual capacity would be different after processing the attended figure. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants with the ISCI maintained IB in which the unattended figures were not perceived, whereas participants with the OSCI disengaged from IB, recognizing more than half of the unattended figures. The results show that attention does not carry out the integrated processing of the inner and outer structure of a figure and that IB is primarily determined by attentional capacity and perceptual intention regarding a figure.
김일국 (2005). 역동적 주의 배정이 부적점화에 미치는 영향. 석사학위 청구논문. 서울대학교.
김희정, 김정오 (2010). 우리는 보지 못하는 것을 볼 수 있는가. 원고 준비 중.
송유설 (2009). 무주의 상태에서 낯선 형태가 지각되는가? 석사학위 청구논문. 서울대학교.
Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. (1974). Working Memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 8, pp. 17-90. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
DeSchepper, B., & Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and, Cognition. 22, 27-47.
Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963) Attention: some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90.
Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interfence in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. NJ: Prentice-Hall
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468
Most, S. B., & Scholl, B. J., & Clifford, E. R., & Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review, 112, 217-242.
Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975) Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive psychology, 7, 480-494.
Norman, D. A. (1968). Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychological Review, 75, 522-536.
Rock, I & Gutman, D. (1981). The effect of inattention on form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 275-285
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 261-267
Song, J. H. & Kim, J.-O. (2000). The effect of stimulus-dependent capacity allocation on negative priming. The 20th Summer Conference in the Korean Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Association.