바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.1
Citation Share

The Effect of the Inner/Outer Structure Coding on the Perception of Unattended Figure

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.1, pp.59-73
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.1.005


& (2010). The Effect of the Inner/Outer Structure Coding on the Perception of Unattended Figure. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22(1), 59-73, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.1.005
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The present study examined the effects of processing an attended figure on the perception of an unattended figure in a two overlapping novel figure task. Rock & Gutman(1981) reported that unattended figures were rarely recognized because of the absence of attention in this task, which was defined as ‘inattentional blindness’'(IB)'. They also suggested that attention processes both the outer and inner structure of an attended figure. To explore whether attention selectively processes the structural features of a novel figure, thus affecting the perception of an unattended figure, we manipulated attentional capacity by two different instructions, the outer structure coding instruction(OSCI) and the inner structure coding instruction(ISCI). It was assumed that depending upon instructions, recognition rates of unattended figures should be varied as the amount of residual capacity would be different after processing the attended figure. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants with the ISCI maintained IB in which the unattended figures were not perceived, whereas participants with the OSCI disengaged from IB, recognizing more than half of the unattended figures. The results show that attention does not carry out the integrated processing of the inner and outer structure of a figure and that IB is primarily determined by attentional capacity and perceptual intention regarding a figure.

keywords
선택적 주의, 무주의 맹, 주의 용량, 지각적 의도, selective attention, Inattentional blindness, attentional capacity, residual capacity, perceptual intention

Reference

1.

김일국 (2005). 역동적 주의 배정이 부적점화에 미치는 영향. 석사학위 청구논문. 서울대학교.

2.

김희정, 김정오 (2010). 우리는 보지 못하는 것을 볼 수 있는가. 원고 준비 중.

3.

송유설 (2009). 무주의 상태에서 낯선 형태가 지각되는가? 석사학위 청구논문. 서울대학교.

4.

Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. (1974). Working Memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 8, pp. 17-90. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

5.

Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.

6.

DeSchepper, B., & Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and, Cognition. 22, 27-47.

7.

Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963) Attention: some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90.

8.

Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interfence in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300.

9.

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. NJ: Prentice-Hall

10.

Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468

11.

Most, S. B., & Scholl, B. J., & Clifford, E. R., & Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review, 112, 217-242.

12.

Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975) Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive psychology, 7, 480-494.

13.

Norman, D. A. (1968). Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychological Review, 75, 522-536.

14.

Rock, I & Gutman, D. (1981). The effect of inattention on form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 275-285

15.

Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 261-267

16.

Song, J. H. & Kim, J.-O. (2000). The effect of stimulus-dependent capacity allocation on negative priming. The 20th Summer Conference in the Korean Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Association.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy