바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.2
Citation Share

The effect of age of acquisition on fixation durations in Korean reading: An eye tracking study

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.2, pp.129-142
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.001


& (2010). The effect of age of acquisition on fixation durations in Korean reading: An eye tracking study. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22(2), 129-142, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.001
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of age of acquisition(AoA) on skilled reading using eyetracking. Although many studies have suggested that AoA would affect the performance of skilled readers, the issue of AoA in reading has been a controversial and much disputed subject within the field of psycholinguistics. Zevin & Seidenberg(2002, 2004) have presented an important methodological critique of previous studies of AoA effects. They argued that previous studies would have not found AoA effects if cumulative frequency had been controlled adequately. The main issue addressed in this paper is whether AoA effect would be found when subjective frequency, which is assumed to replace cumulative frequency, is controlled. In Experiment 1, participants read sentences with early and late acquired words controlled on SF. Single fixation duration, first fixation duration, and gaze duration of early acquired words were shorter than those of late acquired words. In Experiment 2, other participants also read sentences with high and low frequency words controlled on AoA. There was no frequency effect for single fixation duration, first fixation duration, and gaze duration. Results from these two experiments demonstrate that AoA affects eye fixation durations during sentence reading.

keywords
Age of acquisition, Korean, cumulative frequency, eye movement, 습득연령, 한국어, 누적빈도, 안구운동

Reference

1.

고성룡, 홍효진, 윤소정, 조병환 (2008). 우리글 명사 어절에서의 단어 빈도 효과: 안구운동 추적 연구. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 20(1), 21-37

2.

권효원, 김선경, 이혜원 (2006). 한글단어재인에서 단어빈도와 의미점화효과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 18(3), 203-220.

3.

박태진 (2003). 한국어 다어의 주관적 빈도 추정치 및 단어 재인에 미치는 빈도 효과. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 5(2), 349-366.

4.

윤소정 (2009). 우리말 단어에서 습득연령 효과: 안구운동 추적 연구, 서울대학교 대학원, 석사학위논문

5.

이광오 (1993). 한글 단어인지과정에서 표기법이 심성어휘집의 구조와 검색에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 5, 26-39.

6.

Balota, D., & Chumbly, J. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(3), 340-357.

7.

Balota, D., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,9838 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 29(4), 639-647.

8.

Balota, D., Yap, M. J. & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In Traxler, J. M., & Gernsbacher, M.(Eds.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics. 285-376. London: ELSEVIER.

9.

Brown, G. D. A., & Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15, 208-216.

10.

Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Meot, A., & Fayol, M. (2001). Age-of-acquisition and word frequency in the lexical decision task: Further evidence from the French language.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 20, 401-443.

11.

Brown, G. D. A., & Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15, 208-216.

12.

Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Age-of-Acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns, Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 12 563-576.

13.

Cuetos, F., Ellis, A. W., & Alvarez, B. (1999). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 650-658.

14.

Ducan, C. P. (1970). Thinking of a word under different retrieval constraints. Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 356-361.

15.

Forster, K., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.

16.

Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 267-283.

17.

Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1999a). Age-of-acquisition and frequency effects in speeded word naming. Cognition, 73, B27-B36.

18.

Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1999b). Age of acquisition, word frequency and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 592-602.

19.

Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words, Behavior research methods & Instrumentation, 12(4), 395-427.

20.

Hall, J. f. (1954). Learning as a function of word-frequency. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 138-140.

21.

Johnson, D. M. (1966). Solution of anagrams. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 371-384.

22.

Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 6099

23.

Johnston, R. A., & Barry, C. (2006). Age-of-acquisition and lexical processing. Visual Cognition, 13, 789-845.

24.

Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providennce, R. I.: Brown University Press, 1967.

25.

Laws, K. R., Leeson, V. C., & Gale, T. M. (2002). The effect of "masking" on picture naming. Cortex, 38, 137-148.

26.

Lloyd, K. E. (1964). Short-term retention as a function of word frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 286-289.

27.

Martin, J. G. (1964). Associative strength and word frequency in paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 317-320.

28.

Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys(Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition, (pp. 148-197). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

29.

Morrison, C. M., Ellis, A. W., & Quinlan, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Memory and Cognition, 20, 705-714.

30.

Morrison, C. M. & Ellis, A. W. (1995). roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision, Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(1), 116-133

31.

Pind, J., & Tryggvadottir, H. B. (2002). Determinants of picture naming in Icelandic. Sandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 221-226.

32.

Rayner, K. (1998) Eye Movements in reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.

33.

Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A.(1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201.

34.

Rosenberg, S., Coyle, P. J., & Porter, W. L. (1966). Recall of adverbs as a function of the frequency of their adjective roots. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 75-76.

35.

Saltz, E, & Modigliani, v. (1970). Meaningfulness and short-term memory: Test of a model. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 209-312.

36.

Snodgrass, J. G., & Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 516-536.

37.

Turner, J. E., Valentine, T., & Ellis, A. W. (1998). Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1282-1291.

38.

Vitkovitch, M., & Tyrrell, L. (1995). Sources of disagreement in object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(A), 822-848.

39.

Winnick, W. A., & Kressel, K. (1965). Tachistoscopic recognition thresholds, paired-associate learning, and free recall as a function of abstractness-concreteness and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 163-168.

40.

Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1-29

41.

Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory. Memory & Cognition, 32(1), 31-38

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy