바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.22 No.2
Citation Share

부호화 시 인지적 노력과 기억 왜곡에 대한 경고지시가 오기억에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Cognitive Effort at Encoding and Warning on False Memory in DRM Paradigm

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.2, pp.143-159
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.002
박영신 (고려대학교)
김기중 (가톨릭대학교)
박영신, & 김기중. (2010). 부호화 시 인지적 노력과 기억 왜곡에 대한 경고지시가 오기억에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22(2), 143-159, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.002
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

오기억에 대한 경고는 DRM 패러다임에서 오기억을 감소시키는 가장 확실한 방법 가운데 하나이다. 오기억 감소와 관련하여 부호화 과정에서 발생하는 인지적 노력과 오기억에 대한 경고 효과를 검토하기 위해 두 개의 실험이 진행되었다. 각각 52명과 48명이 실험 1과 실험 2에 참가하였다. 실험 1에서는 오기억에 대한 경고 지시와 부호화 시 처리수준이 조작되었다. 경고조건이나 비경고조건에 무선적으로 할당된 참가자들은 학습 단계에서 단어 목록에 대한 호감도 평정을 하거나 단어의 채색된 색깔에 반응해야 했다. 검사단계에서 참가자들에게 재인 검사를 시행하여 오기억율과 실제기억율을 관찰하였다. 실험 1의 결과, 깊은 처리 목록에 비해 얕은 처리 목록에 대해서 경고에 대한 오기억 감소 효과가 더 크게 나타났다. 실험 2에서는 경고 지시와 부호화 시 목록의 산출처리과정이 조작되었다. 참가자들은 학습 단계에서 학습 목록의 절반은 산출처리를 통해, 나머지 절반은 단순한 읽기 처리를 통해 부호화하였다. 실험 1과 마찬가지로 검사단계에서 참가자들은 재인 검사를 받았다. 실험 2의 분석 결과, 산출 처리 목록에 비해 읽기 처리 목록에 대한 경고 지시가 오기억을 효과적으로 감소시키는 것으로 나타났다. 두 실험의 결과는 DRM 과제에서 목록의 부호화 시 인지적 노력이 적을 때 유인단어에 대한 경고는 오기억을 효과적으로 감소시킬 수 있다는 사실을 제안한다. 이 결과는 오기억에 대한 활성화-모니터링 이론의 입장에서 설명될 수 있다.

keywords
DRM 패러다임, 오기억, 처리수준 이론, 산출 처리과정, 활성화-모니터링 이론, DRM paradigm, level of processing, generative processing, activation-monitoring theory

Abstract

The warning instruction for the memory illusion during DRM task is one of the simple and effective resolutions to avoid false memory about critical lures. Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of warning to reduce false memory and cognitive effort at encoding within DRM paradigm. Fifty-two and forty eight volunteers participated in experiment 1 and 2 each. In experiment 1, the warning instruction and level of processing for study lists were manipulated. Participants were randomly assigned in either warning condition or no-warning condition. They were asked to rate pleasantness for the presenting words or to respond the exact color of words. At the test phase, general recognition test was administrated to observe true and false memory. The warning led less false memory for shallow processing lists relative to deep processing ones. In experiment 2, the warning and generative processing were manipulated. As like experiment 1, half of participants were given a demonstration of the memory illusion and were instructed to avoid it before lists presentation. Participants were informed that 40 words or 40 word fragments would be presented and then they were asked to generate or read the words during the study phase. The warning instruction decreased false memory rates more with read items relative to generated items. The results of two experiments suggest that “cognitive effort” at encoding has advantage to reduce false memory and that the warning for memory illusion can decrease false memory more when the effort is less. The theoretical implications of results were discussed based on activation/monitoring framework.

keywords
DRM 패러다임, 오기억, 처리수준 이론, 산출 처리과정, 활성화-모니터링 이론, DRM paradigm, level of processing, generative processing, activation-monitoring theory

참고문헌

1.

박미자 (2004). 인지부하가 오기억에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 16(1), 111-130.

2.

박영신, 김기중, 박희경 (2004). DRM 패러다임에서 오기억과 실제기억에 미치는 부적 정서의 효과. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 16(2), 131-150.

3.

박영신, 박희경, 김기중(2003). 오기억을 산출하는 단어 목록 규준. 사회과학 연구, 제19집. 207-220.

4.

Anastasi, J. S., Rhodes, M. G., & Burns, M. G. (2000). Distinguishing between memory illusions and actual memories using phenomenological measurements and explicit warnings. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 1-26.

5.

Benjamin, A. (2001). On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 941-947.

6.

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic memory. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.

7.

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhar, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 4, 671-684.

8.

Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 671-684.

9.

Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.

10.

Gallo, D. A., McDermott, K. B., Percer, J. M., & Roediger, H. L. (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 339-353.

11.

Gallo, D. A., Roberts, M. J., & Seamon, J. G. (1997). Remembering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creating false memories? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 271-276.

12.

Gallo, D. A., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2001). Association false recognition occurs without strategic criterion shifts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 579-586.

13.

Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 5-16.

14.

Gunter, R. W., Bodner, G. E., & Azad, T.(2007). Generation and Mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1083-1092.

15.

Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (1999). Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1195-1209.

16.

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source Monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.

17.

Jou, J., & Foreman, J. (2007). Transfer of learning in avoiding false memory: The roles of warning, immediate feedback, and incentive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 877-896.

18.

McCabe, D.P., & Smith, A. D. (2006). The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall, Memory, 14, 570-583.

19.

Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared. Memory & Cognition, 25, 826-837.

20.

McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (1998). Attempting to avoid illusory memories: Robust false recognition of associates persists under conditions of explicit warnings and immediate testing. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 508-520.

21.

McDermott, K. B., & Watson, J. M. (2001). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 160-176.

22.

Neuschatz, J. S., Payne, D. G., Lampinen, J. M., & Toglia, M. P. (2001). Assessing the effectiveness of warnings and the phenomenological characteristics of false memories. Memory, 9, 53-71.

23.

Perez-Mata,m M. N., Read, J. D., & Diges, M. (2002). Effects of divided attention and word concreteness on correct recall and false memory reports. Memory, 10, 161-177.

24.

Peters, M. J. V., Jelicic, M., Gorski, B. Sijstermans, K., Giesbrecht, T., & Merckelbach, H. (2008). The corrective effects of warning on false memories in the DRM paradigm are limited to full attention conditions. Acta Psychologica, 129, 308-314.

25.

Read, J. D. (1996). From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 105-111.

26.

Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1-75.

27.

Rhodes, M. G., & Anastasi, J. S. (2000). The effects of a levels-of-processing manipulation on false recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 158-162.

28.

Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in list. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803-814.

29.

Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1999). False alarms and False memories. Psychological Review, 106, 406-410.

30.

Roediger, H. L., Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., & Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 385-407.

31.

Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.

32.

Seamon, J. G., Goodkind, M. S., Dumey, A. D., Dick, E., Aufseeser, M. S., Strickland, S., E., Woulfin, J. R, & Fung, N. S. (2003). "If I didn't wirte it, why would I remember it?" Effects of encoding, attention, and practice on accurate and false memory. Memory and Cognition, 31, 445-457.

33.

Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., & Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 1-24.

34.

Soraci, S. A., Carlin, M. T., Chechile, R. A., Franks, J. J., Wills, T., & Watanabe, T. (1999). Encoding variability and cuing in generative processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 541-559.

35.

Soraci, S. A., Michael, T. C., Toglia, M. P., Chechile, R. A., & Neuschatz, J. S. (2003). Generative processing and false memories: When there is no cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 511-523.

36.

Thapar, A., & McDermott, K. B. (2001). False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing. Memory & Cognition, 29, 424-432.

37.

Toglia, M. P., Neuschatz, J. S., & Goodwin, K. A. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less. Memory, 7, 233-256.

38.

Toyer, A. K., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). The effect of divided attention on memory for items and their context. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 161-170.

39.

Tussing, A. A., & Greene, R. L. (1997). False recognition of associates: How robust if the effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 572-576.

40.

Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122-129.

41.

Watson, J. M., Bunting, M. F., Poole, B. J., & Conway, A. R. (2005). Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 76-85.

42.

Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., & Balota, D. A. (2004). Attempting to avoid false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm: Assessing the combined influence of practice and warnings in young and old adults. Memory & Cognition, 32, 135-141.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책