바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.23 No.4
Citation Share

The importance of re-learning after retrieval induction in a paired-associate task

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2011, v.23 no.4, pp.565-581
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.4.006


& (2011). The importance of re-learning after retrieval induction in a paired-associate task. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 23(4), 565-581, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.4.006
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Recently, there have been several attempts to apply the results of theoretical research on memory processes in actual learning settings. One such attempt is the promotion of learning via retrieval or testing. Learning via retrieval occurs when one is forced to retrieve memorized information. For example, in a task where participants are asked to memorize cue-target pairs, learning is enhanced when only the cues are displayed during half of the learning session, inducing retrieval, and then the cue-target pairs are shown together, rather than when the cue-target pairs are displayed together throughout the session. One explanation for the memory enhancement effect of retrieval is that memory retrieval forces the learner to produce the answers and modify one's errors. The current study sought to examine such error modification processes as well as the importance of re-learning after retrieval induction by carrying out five experiments with college students. Experiment 1 was performed to replicate the findings of previous research. Then retrieval was induced and the conditions for re-learning was manipulated in two different ways. In Experiment 2, only the cue was displayed first, and then only the target was displayed in the experimental condition and the cue-target pairs were displayed together in the control. In Experiment 3, the cue was displayed first, and two conditions were compared: one in which the cue-target pairs were displayed longer and one in which the pairs were displayed for a shorter amount of time. In both experiments, performance increased when the conditions were better for re-learning. In Experiment 4, we found that there was no difference in performance when the retrieval induction time was different but the re-learning time was the same. In Experiment 5, when the re-learning time was short, the performance of retrieval induction condition was lower than that of the condition where learning took place without retrieval induction. These results suggest that in pair association learning tasks, not only retrieval induction but sufficient re-learning is an important factor in promoting memory performance.

keywords
인출, 재학습, 쌍대연합과제, 기억, retrieval, re-learning, paired-associate learning, memory

Reference

1.

이해숙과 김정오 (2003). 음운 규칙의 적용 용이성이 음운 정보처리에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지 인지 및 생물, 15(3), 425- 454.

2.

Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M., & Anderson, M. (Eds), (2009). Memory. UK: Psychology Press.

3.

Bjork, R.A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomenon. R. L. Solso (Ed.) Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 123-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

4.

Bransford, J.D., & Johnson, M.K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 11, 717-726.

5.

Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory and Cognition, 20(6), 633-642.

6.

Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 187–193.

7.

Chan, J. C, K. (2010). Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials, Memory, 18, 49-57.

8.

Glover, J. (1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone, but nearly forgotten. Journal of Education Psychology, 81(3), 392-399.

9.

Izawa, S. (1967). Function of test trial in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 194-209.

10.

Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966-968.

11.

Kornell, N., Hays, M., Bjork, R. A. (2009). Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(4), pp. 989-998.

12.

Mozer, M. C., Howe, M., & Pashler, H. (2004). Using testing to enhance learning: A comparison of two hypotheses. In Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

13.

Park, J. (2005). Learning in a new computerized testing system. Journal of Educational Psychology. 97 (3), 436-443.

14.

Pashler, H., Bain, P., Bottage, B., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning (NCER 2007-2004). Washington, DC: National Center for Educationa Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Retrieved from http://ncer.ed/gov/.

15.

Pashler, H., Rohrer, D., Cepeda, N. J., & Carpenter, S. K. (2007). Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 187-193.

16.

Roediger, H. L. (2000). Why retrieval is the key process in understanding human memory. In E. Tulving (Ed.), Memory, consciousness, and the brain (pp. 52-75), Psychology Press.

17.

Roediger, H. L. & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory. Basic research and implications for educational practices. Perspectives on psychological science, 1, 181-210.

18.

Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2010). Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies. Educational Researcher, 39(5), 406–12.

19.

Spitzer, H. F. (1939). Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 641–656.

20.

Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1392–1399.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy