바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.23 No.4

Citation Share

DRM 패러다임에서 정서가와 인지적 노력이 오기억에 미치는 영향

The Influence of Emotional valence and Cognitive Effort on False Memory in DRM paradigm

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2011, v.23 no.4, pp.605-621
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.4.008
박영신 (가톨릭대학교)
김채연 (고려대학교)
박영신, & 김채연. (2011). DRM 패러다임에서 정서가와 인지적 노력이 오기억에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 23(4), 605-621, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.4.008

초록

본 연구는 DRM 패러다임에서 목록의 정서가와 인지적노력 수준이 실제기억과 오기억에 미치는 효과를 탐색하기 위해 수행되었다. 참가자들은 DRM 과제를 통해 정서 목록과 중성 목록으로 구성된 의미적 연합 목록을 제시받고, 나중에 재인과제를 수행하였다. 실험 1에서는 처리수준을 통해 인지적 노력 정도를 조작하였다. 참가자들은 목록에 대해 호오도 평정을 하거나 채색된 색깔에 대해 판단해야 했다. 실험 2에서는 산출처리를 통해 인지적 노력 정도를 조작하였다. 참가자들은 목록에 대해 자음과 모음을 스스로 결합하여 단어를 완성하여 소리내서 읽거나, 거꾸로 뒤집혀 제시되는 단어를 소리내서 읽어야 했다. 실험 결과, 두 실험 모두에서 상대적으로 인지적 노력이 강한 조건인 경우 정서 오기억 감소 효과가 나타났다. DRM 패러다임 내에서 정서 오기억 감소 효과는 더 큰 인지적 노력 조건에서 관찰되었으며, 정서는 오기억을 감소시킬 것이라는 가능성이 다시 한 번 확인되었다.

keywords
DRM paradigm, emotional valence, false memory, level of processing, generative processing, DRM 패러다임, 오기억, 정서가, 처리수준 이론, 산출 처리과정

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate how emotional valence and the extend of cognitive effort as a semantic processing had influence on true and false memories in DRM paradigm. for two experiments. Both emotional lists and neutral lists were presented and standard recognition test was administerd by participants. In experiment 1, the level of processing was used to manipulate cognitive efforts. Participants were asked to rate the pleasantness of each words or to judge the color of word items. In experiment 2, the generative processing was manipulated for cognitive efforts. Participants were asked to make a word by combining consonants and vowels, or to read the upside-down mirror image of each words. The results showed that false memory rates with emotional lists were lower than neutral lists in both experiments. Moreover, the reduction of false memory in emotional lists was observed in the more cognitive effort condition. The results of two experiments indicated that emotion had an effect on the decline of false memory and confirmed the possibility that emotion could bring the benefit effect on memory performance.

keywords
DRM paradigm, emotional valence, false memory, level of processing, generative processing, DRM 패러다임, 오기억, 정서가, 처리수준 이론, 산출 처리과정

참고문헌

1.

박영신, 박희경, 김기중 (2003). 오기억을 산출하는 단어 목록 규준. 사회과학 연구(가톨릭대학교 사회과학 연구소 간행), 19, 207- 220.

2.

박영신, 김기중 (2010). 부호화시 인지적 노력과 기억왜곡에 대한 경고지시가 오기억에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22(2), 143-159.

3.

박영신, 김기중, 박희경 (2004). DRM 패러다임에서 오기억과 실제기억에 미치는 부적 정서의 효과. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 16(2), 131-150.

4.

장미숙, 박영신, 김기중 (2010). 정서와 망각유도지시가 DRM 패러다임에서 실제기억과 오기억에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22(1), 75-93.

5.

Anderson, L., & Shimamura, A. P. (2006). Influences of emotion on context memory while viewing film clips. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 323-337.

6.

Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.

7.

Brainerd, C. J., Stein, L. M., Silveira, R. A., Rohenkohl, G., & Reyna, V. F. (2008). How does negative emotion cause false memories? Psychological Science, 19, 919-925.

8.

Buchanan, T. W., Etzel, J. A., Adolphs, R., & Tranel, D. (2006). The influence of autonomic arousal and semantic relatedness on memory for emotional words. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 26-33.

9.

Budson, A. E., Todman, R. W., Chong, H., Adams, E. H., Kensinger, E. A., Krangel, T. S., & Wright, C. I. (2006). False recognition of emotional word lists in aging and Alzheimer disease. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 19, 71-78.

10.

Christianson, S. A. (1989). Flashbulb memories: Speical, but not so special. Memory & Cognition, 17, 435-443.

11.

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhar, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 4, 671-684.

12.

Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 671-684.

13.

Comblain, C., D'Argembeau, A., Van der Linden, M., & Aldenhoff, L. (20004). The effect of ageing on the recollection of emotional and neutral pictures. Memory, 12, 673-684.

14.

Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17 -22.

15.

Dehon, H., Larøi, F., & Van der Linden, M. (2010). Affective valence influences participant's susceptibility to false memories and illusory recollection. Emotion, 10, 627-639.

16.

Dodson, C. S. & Schacter, D. L. (2001). “If I had said it I would have remembered it:” Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 155-161.

17.

Dodson, C. S. & Schacter, D. L. (2002a). When false recognition meets metacognition: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 782-803.

18.

Dodson, C. S & Schacter, D. L. (2002b). Aging and strategic retrieval processes: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychology and Aging, 17, 405-415.

19.

Edward, R. J., & Doser, B. (1983). Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 676-696.

20.

Gallo, D. A. (2006). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.

21.

Gunter, R. W., Bodner, G. E., & Azad, T. (2007). Generation and Mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1083-1092.

22.

Howe, M. L. (2007). Children's emotional false memories. Psychological Science, 18, 856-860.

23.

Howe, M. L., Candel, I., Otgaar, H., Malone, C., & Wimmer, M. C. (2010). Valence and the development of immediate and lont-term false memory illusions. Memory, 18, 58-75.

24.

Huang, Y., & Yeh, Y. (2006). ‘Memory errors on emotional lures: Is it possible to mistake a positive stimulus for a negative one?’. Cognition & Emotion, 20, 646-670.

25.

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source Monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3-28

26.

Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2004). The effects of emotional content and aging on false memories: Effects of ageing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 1-9.

27.

Loftus, E. F. (2003). Our changeable memories: Legal and practical implication. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 4. 231-234.

28.

Mather, M. (2007). Emotional arousal and memory binding: An object-based framework. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2, 33-52.

29.

Mather, M., & Nesmith, K. (2008). Arousal- enhanced location memory for pictures. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 449-464.

30.

McCabe, D. P., & Smith, A. D. (2006). The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall, Memory, 14, 570-583.

31.

McDermott, K. B., & Watson, J. M. (2001). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 160-176.

32.

McElroy, L. A. (1987). The generation effect with homographs: Evidence for postgeneration processing. Memory & Cognition, 15, 148-153.

33.

Ochsner, K. N. (2000). Are affective events richly recollected or simply familiar? The experience and process of recognizing feelings past. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 242-261.

34.

Pesta, B. J., Murphy, M., & Sanders, R. (2001). Are emotionally charged lures immune to false memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 27, 328-338.

35.

Read, J. D. (1996). From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 105-111.

36.

Roediger, H. L., Ⅲ, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in list. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803-814.

37.

Schacter, D. L., Cendan, D. L., Dodson, C.. S., & Clifford, E. R. (2001). Retrieval conditions and false recognition: Testing the distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 827-833.

38.

Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., & Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 1-24.

39.

Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.

40.

Soraci, S. A., Jr., Carlin, M. T., Chechile, R. A., Franks, J. J., Wills, T., & Watanabe, T. (1999). Encoding variability and cuing in generative processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 541-559.

41.

Talmi, D., Schimmack, U., Paterson, T., & Moscovitch, M. (2007). The role of attention and relatedness in emotionally enhanced memory. Emotion, 7, 89-102.

42.

Thapar, A., & McDermott, K. B. (2001). False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing. Memory & Cognition, 29, 424-432.

43.

Tussing, A. A., & Greene, R. L. (1997). False recognition of associates: How robust if the effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 572- 576.

44.

Windmann, S., & Kutas, M. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates of emotion- induced recognition bias. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 577-592.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책