바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

문화성향에 따른 전역선행성 효과에서의 차이

Differential Effects of the Cultural Orientation Dispositions on Global Precedence

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2012, v.24 no.1, pp.41-63
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.1.003
주미정 (부산대학교)
신현정 (부산대학교)
이재식 (부산대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 동일 문화권에서의 문화성향(개인주의-집단주의 차원과 수평-수직 차원)이 전역/국소 처리(전역선행성 효과)에 미치는 상대적인 차이를 살펴보기 위하여 수행되었다. 이를 위해 Singelis 등(1995)의 문화성향 질문지(INDCOL)에 기초하여 실험참가자들을 분류한 후, 각 문화유형에 따라 자극 유형(화살표로 구성된 복합도형 또는 영문 대문자로 구성된 복합문자)과 자극-자극 속성 일치 여부(복합자극의 전역 속성과 국소 속성의 일치 또는 불일치 조건)가 체계적으로 조작된 실험조건에서 전역선행성 효과가 어떻게 달라지는지 측정하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. (1) 전반적으로 복합문자에 비해 복합도형에 반응하는 경우, 그리고 자극-자극 속성 일치 조건에 비해 불일치 조건에서 전역선행성 효과가 더 컸으나, 개인주의-집단주의 차원이나 수평-수직 차원 각각에 따른 전역선행성 효과의 차이는 발견되지 않았다. 또한 (2) 전역선행성 효과에 대한 개인주의-집단주의 차원과 수평-수직 차원 사이의 상호작용 효과가 유의하지 않아 두 차원이 서로 독립적임을 확인하였다. (3) 개인주의-집단주의 차원과 자극-자극 속성 일치 여부 조건 사이의 상호작용 효과는 유의하지 않았던 반면, 수평-수직 차원과 자극-자극 속성 일치 여부 조건 사이에서는 상호작용 효과가 유의하였다. 이러한 결과는 동일문화권 내에서는 개인주의-집단주의 차원보다 수평-수직 차원이 전역선행성 효과 차이에 더 많은 영향을 미친다는 것을 시사한다.

keywords
individualism-collectivism, horizontal-vertical dimension, stimulus-stimulus congruence, global precedence, 개인주의-집단주의 차원, 수평-수직 차원, 자극-자극 속성 일치 여부, 전역선행성 효과

Abstract

This study investigated the differential effects of individualism-collectivism dimension (IC) and horizontal- vertical dimension (HV) in cultural orientation of individuals in the same cultural background on global precedence. The participants were classified into IC and HVD groups, and asked to respond to compound stimuli which were varied by stimuli types (figure/letter) and stimulus-stimulus (S-S) congruence. Differences in global precedence were compared. The results showed the followings. First, although global precedence was larger in the compound figure than in the compound letter, and larger in the S-S incongruent condition than the congruent condition, none of cultural orientation dimensions made any difference. Second, IC and HV affected global precedence independently. Third, a significant interaction effect between HV and S-S congruence was found, but there was no interaction between IC and S-S congruence. These results indicated HVD rather than IC can be a more valid dimension to compare the effect of individual differences in cultural orientation on global precedence.

keywords
individualism-collectivism, horizontal-vertical dimension, stimulus-stimulus congruence, global precedence, 개인주의-집단주의 차원, 수평-수직 차원, 자극-자극 속성 일치 여부, 전역선행성 효과

참고문헌

1.

김정오 (1990). 주의 기제가 자극 확률효과 및 선행성에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 2, 12-35.

2.

류승아 (2009). 정신장애인의 경쟁고용에 대한 대학생들의 태도: 한국과 미국의 비교 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23, 1- 25.

3.

박선희, 박태진 (2011). 전역/국지처리 과제에서 정서자극이 시각적 주의범위에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 23, 139-151.

4.

박연우, 손영숙, 김민식 (2001). 주변자극의 전역 및 국지형태가 표적자극의 국지형태 처리에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 13, 271-285.

5.

박창호 (2003). 전역 선행성 원리에 대한 한 반증: 두 수준의 이심률이 동등한 경우에도. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 15, 549-559.

6.

천선문, 이수경, 고애란 (2006). 문화성향이 의복소비행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자 광고, 7, 277-300.

7.

한규석, 신수진 (1999). 한국인의 선호가치 변화-수직적 집단주의에서 수평적 개인주의로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 13, 293-310.

8.

Bontempo, R., & Rivero, J. C. (1992). Cultural variation in cognition: The role of self-concept in the attitude behavior link. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Academy of Management in Las Vegas, Nevada.

9.

Chiu, L. H. (1972). A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. International Journal of Psychology, 7, 235-242.

10.

Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). Situational salience and cultural differences in the correspondence bias and in the actor-observer bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 949-960.

11.

Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Cultural psychology of surprise: Holistic theories and recognition of contradiction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 890-905.

12.

Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 691-705.

13.

Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47 -63.

14.

Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, E. R. (2005). Culture variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 12629- 12633.

15.

Fiske, S. (2001). Effects of power on bias: Power explains and maintains individual, group, and societal disparities. In A. Lee-Chai & J. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 181-194). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

16.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequence: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

17.

Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

18.

Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & van den Wildenberg, W. (2011). Religion and action control: Faith-specific modulation of the Simon effect but not stop- signal performance. Cognition. 120, 177-185.

19.

Hong, Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Benet- Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720.

20.

Ji, L., Nisbett, R. E., & Su, Y. (2001). Culture, change, and prediction. Psychological Science, 12, 450-456.

21.

Ji, L., Zhang, Z., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Culture, language, and categorization. Kingston, Ontario: Queens University.

22.

Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berr, M. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp.1-50). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

23.

Kim, U. (1994). Individualism and collectivism:Conceptual clarification and elaboration. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S-C. Choi, & G. Yoon. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 19-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

24.

Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, T. J. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at the New Look. Psychological. Science, 14, 201-206.

25.

Koo, M., & Choi, I. (2005). Becoming a holistic thinker: Training effect of Oriental medicine on reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1-9.

26.

Kuhnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 492 -499.

27.

Lin, Z., & Han, S. (2009). Self-construal priming modulates the scope of visual attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 802-813.

28.

Lin, Z., Lin, Y., & Han, S. (2008). Self-construal priming modulates visual activity underlying global/local perception. Biological Psychology, 77, 93-97.

29.

Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

30.

Masuda, T, Gonzalez, R, Kwan, L, & Nisbett, R. E. (2008). Culture and aesthetic preference: Comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1260-1275.

31.

Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922-934.

32.

Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2006). Culture and change blindness. Cognitive Science, 30, 381- 399.

33.

McKone, E., Davies, A., Fernando, D., Aalders, R., Leung, H., Wickramariyaratne, T., & Platow, M. (2010). Asia has the global advantage: Race and visual attention. Vision Research 50, 1540-1549.

34.

Mills, J., & Clark. M. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 3, pp.121-144). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

35.

Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2006). Culture and the physical environment: Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychological Science, 17, 113-119.

36.

Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.

37.

Nisbett, E. R., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.

38.

Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 653-684.

39.

Oyserman, D. (2006). High power, low power, and equality: Culture beyond individualism and collectivism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 352-356.

40.

Park, C., & Kim, J. (2004), Attention shift to global and local level of a form depends upon stimulus set. The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 169-189.

41.

Peng, K., & Knowles, E. D. (2003). Culture, education, and the attribution of physical causality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1272-1284.

42.

Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741-754.

43.

Shavitt, S., Laiwani, A. K., Zhang, J., & Torelli, C. J. (2006). The horizontal/vertical distinction in cross-cultural consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 325-356.

44.

Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.

45.

Triandis, H. C. (1982). Review of culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values, Human Organization, 41, 86-90.

46.

Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.

47.

Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp.41 -133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

48.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

49.

Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128

50.

Yamaguchi, S. (1994). Empirical evidence on collectivism among the Japanese. In U. Kim H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi. S-C. Choi, & G. Yoon. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp.175-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물