바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1226-9654
  • E-ISSN2733-466X
  • KCI

연령에 따른 인지 변화 양상

The Age-Related Changes in Cognitive Function

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2012, v.24 no.2, pp.127-148
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.2.003
이혜원 (이화여자대학교)
김선경 (이화여자대학교)
이고은 (이화여자대학교)
정유진 (이화여자대학교)
박지윤 (이화여자대학교)

초록

본 연구에서는 노화에 따른 인지적 변화 양상을 여러 인지 영역에 걸쳐 포괄적으로 살펴보았다. 청년, 중년, 노인의 세 연령 집단을 대상으로 다양한 검사도구와 실험과제를 사용하여 어휘력, 기억, 지각, 주의, 언어처리에서의 수행을 비교하였다. 검사도구(K-WAIS, K-MAS)를 사용해 어휘력, 작업기억, 언어적 기억, 지각 및 공간 능력을 검토했으며, 실험과제(스트룹, 어휘판단, 의미범주판단)를 사용해 선택적 주의 및 언어처리과정을 검토했다. 연구 결과 모든 영역에서 연령 증가에 따른 전반적 쇠퇴를 공통적으로 확인할 수 있었으며, 그 변화 양상은 영역 별로 차이가 있었다. 연령 증가에 따라 지각능력은 급격한 쇠퇴를 보였으나 어휘력은 상대적으로 보존되었으며, 작업 및 언어기억은 지각보다는 완만하나 역시 지속적 감소를 보였다. 실험 결과에서 반응시간의 증가 양상이 세 과제에서 일치하면서 노화에 따른 공통적 속도 저하를 보여주었으며, 오반응률에서는 과제 간 대조적 패턴을 보여 노화에 대한 민감성이 주의와 언어처리에서 차이가 있음을 보여주었다. 본 연구 결과는 노화에 따른 인지적 변화 양상에 전반적으로 공통된 부분과 영역 특수적인 부분이 공존하고 있음을 시사해준다.

keywords
인지, 노화, 연령, 노인, 청년, 어휘력, 기억, 지각, 주의, 언어, cognitive function, aging, age, older adults, young adults, vocabulary, memory, perception, attention, language

Abstract

In this study, the age-related changes in cognitive function were demonstrated over various domains. Multiple tests and experiments were executed with the young, middle-aged, and older adults to compare performances of vocabulary, memory, perception, attention, and language processing. Subtests of K-WAIS and of K-MAS measured vocabulary, working memory, verbal memory, perception and spatial ability. Experimental tasks (Stroop, lexical decision, and semantic categorization) were designed for estimating selective attention and language processing. In all measurements, the overall age-related decline was observed, but the declining patterns varied across the functions. The ability in perception rapidly decreased with age whereas the ability in vocabulary was relatively preserved. Working memory and verbal memory also declined continuously by aging, but not as much as perception. The age-related increase of the reaction time indicated that age-related slowing was common to all the 3 experiments. On the contrary, the results of the error rates were different across the tasks, which means that attention and language processing differs in susceptibility to aging. The results suggest that there are common parts and domain-specific parts in the age-related changes in cognitive function.

keywords
인지, 노화, 연령, 노인, 청년, 어휘력, 기억, 지각, 주의, 언어, cognitive function, aging, age, older adults, young adults, vocabulary, memory, perception, attention, language

참고문헌

1.

김선경, 이혜원 (2007). 한글단어재인에서 청년과 노인의 의미점화효과. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 19(4), 279-297.

2.

연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원 (1998). 현대 한국어의 어휘빈도. 연세대학교 언어정보개발 연구원 보고서. CLID-WP-98-02-28.

3.

이관용 (1991). 우리말 범주규준조사: 본보기 산출빈도, 전형성, 그리고 세부특징 조사. 한국심리학회지 실험 및 인지, 3, 131-160.

4.

Adams, C. (1991). Qualitative age differences in memory for text: A life-span developmental perspective. Psychology and Aging, 6, 323-336.

5.

Adams, C., Smith, M. C., Nyquist, L., &Perlmutter, M. (1997). Adult age-group differences in recall for the literal and interpretive meanings of narrative text. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52, P187-P195.

6.

Ally, B. A., Waring, J. D., Beth, E. H., McKeever, J. D., Milberg, W. P., & Budson, A. E. (2008). Aging memory for pictures: Using high-density event-related potentials to understand the effect of aging on the picture superiority effect. Neuropsychologia, 46, 679-689.

7.

Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829-839.

8.

Balota, D. A., & Duchek, J. M. (1988). Age-related differences in lexical access, spreading activation, and simple pronunciation. Psychology and Aging, 3, 84-93.

9.

Balota, D. A., Dolan, P. O., & Duchek, J. M. (2000). Memory changes in healthy older adults. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp.395-409). New York: Oxford University Press.

10.

Balota, D. A., Burgess, G. C., Cortese, M. J., & Adams, D. R. (2002). The word-frequency mirror effect in young, old, and early-stage alzheimer's disease: Evidence for two processes in episodic recognition performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 199-226.

11.

Bélanger, S., Belleville, S., & Gauthier, S. (2010). Inhibition impairments in alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and healthy aging: Effect of congruency proportion in a stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 48, 581-590.

12.

Bopp, K. L., & Verhaeghen, P. (2005). Aging and verbal memory span: A meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60, P223-P233.

13.

Bowles, R. P., & Salthouse, T. A. (2008). Vocabulary test format and differential relations to age. Psychology and Aging, 23, 366 -376.

14.

Braver, T. S., & West, R. (2008). Working memory, executive control, and aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed., pp. 311-372). New York: Psychology Press.

15.

Brickman, A. M., & Stern, Y. (2009). Aging and memory in humans, In L. R. Squire (Ed.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (pp.175-180). Oxford: Academic Press.

16.

Buckner, R. L. (2004). Memory and executive function in aging and AD: Multiple factors that cause decline and reserve factors that compensate. Neuron, 44, 195-208.

17.

Bugg, J. M., DeLosh, E. L., Davalos, D. B., & Davis, H. P. (2007). Age differences in stroop interference: Contributions of general slowing and task-specific deficits. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14, 155-167.

18.

Burke, D. M., & Peters, L. (1986). Word associations in old age: Evidence for consistency in semantic encoding during adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 1, 283-291.

19.

Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2008). Language and aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A.Salthouse (Eds.), (pp.373-443). New York: Psychology Press.

20.

Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities (pp.409-422). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

21.

Craik, F. I. M. (1994). Memory changes in normal aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 155-158.

22.

Craik, F. I. M., & Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. In F. I. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.), Aging and cognitive process (pp.191-211). New York: Plenum.

23.

Craik, F. I. M., & Jennings, J. M. (1992). Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik, & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp.51-110). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

24.

Davidson, D. J., Zacks, R. T., & Williams, C. C. (2003). Stroop interference, practice, and aging. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 10, 85-98.

25.

Dennis, N. A., & Cabeza, R., (2008). Neuroimaging of healthy cognitive aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), (pp. 1-54). New York: Psychology Press.

26.

Faubert, J. (2002). Visual perception and aging. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 164-176.

27.

Gilmore, G. C., Spinks, R. A., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). Age effects in coding tasks: Componential analysis and test of the sensory deficit hypothesis. Psychology and Aging, 21, 7- 18.

28.

Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356-388.

29.

Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 22, pp.193-225). San Diego: Academic Press.

30.

Hess, T. M. (2005). Memory and aging in context. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 383-406.

31.

Howard, D. V., Shaw, R. J., & Heisey, J. G. (1986). Aging and the time course of semantic activation. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 195-203.

32.

Hudson, J. M. (2008). Automatic memory processes in normal ageing and alzheimer's disease. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 44, 345- 349.

33.

Humes, L. E., & Floyd, S. S. (2005). Measures of working memory, sequence learning, and speech recognition in the elderly. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 224 -235.

34.

Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working- memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47-70.

35.

Kemper, S., & McDowd, J. (2006). Eye movements of young and older adults while reading with distraction. Psychology and Aging, 21, 32-39.

36.

Kemper, S., & Sumner, A. (2001). The structure of verbal abilities in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 16, 312-322.

37.

Kramer, A. F., & Madden, D. J. (2008). Attention. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), (pp.189-249). New York: Psychology Press.

38.

Laver, G. D. (2000). A speed-accuracy analysis of word recognition in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 15, 705-709.

39.

Laver, G. D., & Burke, D. M. (1993). Why do semantic priming effects increase in old age? A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 8, 34- 43.

40.

Long, D. L., & Prat, C. S. (2002). Working memory and stroop interference: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition, 30, 294-301.

41.

May, C. P., Hasher, L., & Kane, M. J. (1999). The role of interference in memory span. Memory & Cognition, 27, 759-767.

42.

McCabe, D. P., Robertson, C. L., & Smith, A. D. (2005). Age differences in stroop interference in working memory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 633-644.

43.

McCrae, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (2001). Age-related differences in object- and location-based inhibition of return of attention. Psychology and Aging, 16, 437-449.

44.

McLaughlin, P. M., Szostak, C., Binns, M. A., Craik, F. I. M., Tipper, S. P., & Stuss, D. T. (2010). The effects of age and task demands on visual selective attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 197-207.

45.

Murphy, D. R., McDowd, J. M., & Wilcox, K. A. (1999). Inhibition and aging: Similarities between younger and older adults as revealed by the processing of unattended auditory information. Psychology and Aging, 14, 44-59.

46.

Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Old, S. R. (2008). Aging and Memory. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (pp.787- 808). Oxford: Academic Press.

47.

Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Guez, J., & Kreuger, S. (2005). Divided attention in younger and older adults: Effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 520-537.

48.

Old, S. R., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2008). Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: A meta- analysis. Psychology and Aging, 23, 104-118.

49.

Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., Smith, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 299-320.

50.

Poole, B. J., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: The influences of sustained and selective attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1430-1454.

51.

Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 278-289.

52.

Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448-465.

53.

Salthouse, T. A. (1994). The aging of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 535-543.

54.

Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403-428.

55.

Salthouse, T. A. (2001). The broader context of Craik's self-initiated processing hypothesis. In M. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, & H. L. Roediger (Eds.), Perspectives on human memory and cognitive aging: Essays in honour of Fergus Craik (pp.277-285). New York: Psychology Press.

56.

Salthouse, T. A. (2004). What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 140-144.

57.

Salthouse, T. A., & Prill, K. A. (1987). Inferences about age impairments in inferential reasoning. Psychology and Aging, 2, 43-51.

58.

Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539.

59.

Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the alzheimer's type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 461-479.

60.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1-36.

61.

Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Aging and vocabulary score: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 332-339.

62.

Verhaeghen, P., & De Meersman, L. (1998). Aging and the stroop effect: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 13, 120-126.

63.

West, R., & Alain, C. (2000). Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased stroop effect observed in older adults. Psychophysiology, 37, 179-189.

64.

Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., & Li, K. Z. H. (2000). Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp.293-357). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물