바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.24 No.4

Citation Share

The Relation Among on Response Time, Cerebral Cortex's Activities and Empathy Level During Mentalizing and Emotion Inference in Comic Strip Task

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2012, v.24 no.4, pp.295-313
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.4.001


& (2012). The Relation Among on Response Time, Cerebral Cortex's Activities and Empathy Level During Mentalizing and Emotion Inference in Comic Strip Task. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 24(4), 295-313, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.4.001

Abstract

This study investigated the relation among response time, cerebral cortex's activities and empathy level during mentalizing and emotional inference in comic strip task. Experimental participants were separated into high empathy group and low empathy group by their interpersonal reactivity index score. Comic strip task consisted of mentalizing condition, positive emotion inference condition, and negative emotion inference condition. Base line was recorded before performance of task. Reaction time and EEG were measured during performance of comic strip task. According to the results, on response time, both high empathy group and low empathy group responded more quickly to positive emotion inference condition and negative emotion inference condition than mentalizing condition. On the result of cerebral cortex's activities, mirror neuron system, medial prefrontal gyrus, anterior and posterior cingulate gyrus, fusiform gyrus, insula and parahippocampal gyrus of high empathy group were activated in all comic strip condition. According to the results of response time and cerebral cortex's activities, emotion inference is triggered more quickly than mentalizing, but cerebral cortices related to emotion inference are overlapped with that related to mentalizing. In addtion, this study suggest activities of parahippocampal gyrus and posterior cingulate show that there are integration of cognitive information and emotional information and association with memorial representation in empathy process. Finally, the relation between individual personality and physiological difference was discussed.

keywords
공감, 정서 추론, 인지 추론, 대인관계반응지수, 대뇌 피질 활동, empathy, emotion inference, mentalizing, interpersonal reactivity index, cerebral cortex

Reference

1.

박성희 (2004). 공감학. 서울: 학지사

2.

최여정 (2008). 안구 운동 추적과 뇌전위 측정을 통한 기호적 만화 캐릭터와 사실적 만화 캐릭터의 시각적주의집중 및 공감 연구. 한국과학기술원 문화기술대학원 석사학위 논문.

3.

홍기묵 (2004). 청소년의 공감능력과 사회적 유능성과의 관계. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

4.

Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R. J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G., & Freund, H. J. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 400-404.

5.

Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston: Pearson.

6.

Decety, J., Chaminade, T., Grѐzes, J., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2002). A PET exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in reciprocal imitation. NeuroImage, 15, 265-272.

7.

Fletcher, P. C., Happѐ, F., Frith, U., Baker, S. C., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (1995). Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition, 57, 109- 128.

8.

Frith C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50, 531-534.

9.

Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. The Royal Society, 358, 459-473.

10.

Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Functional imaging of 'theory of mind'. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 77-83.

11.

Gallagher, H. L., Happè, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: An fMRI study of 'theory of mind' in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 11-21.

12.

Gallese, V. (2003). The roots of empathy: The shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36, 171-180.

13.

Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Action representation and the inferior parietal lobule. In Wolfgang, P. & Bernhard, H. (Eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action Attention and Performance Vol XIX (pp.247-266). UK: Oxford University Press. [Abstracts]

14.

Happè, F., Ehlers, S., Fletcher, P., Frith, U., Johansson, M., Gillberg, C., Dolan, R., Frackowiak, R., & Frith, C. (1996). 'The theory of mind' in the brain. Evidence from a PET scan study of asperger syndrome. NeuroReport, 8, 197-201.

15.

Hooker, C. I., Verosky, S. C., Germine, L. T., Knight, R. T., & D'Esposito, M. (2008). Mentalizing about emotion and its relationship to empathy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 204-217.

16.

Iacoboni, M., Koski, L. M., Brass, M., Bekkering,H., Woods, R. P., Dubeau, M., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzoltti, G. (2001). Reafferent copies of imitated actions in the right superior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United states of America, 98(24), 13995-13999.

17.

Jabbi, M., Swart, M., & Keysers, C. (2007). Empathy for positive and negative emotions in the gustatory cortex. NeuroImage, 34, 1744- 1753.

18.

Keeser, D., Padbaerg, F., Reisinger, E., Pogarell, O., Kirsch, V., Palm, U., Karch, S., Mӧller, H.-J., Nitsche, M. A., & Mulert, C. (2011). Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulated resting EEG and event-related porentials in healthy subjects: A standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. NeuroImage, 55, 644-657.

19.

Kurth, F., Zilles, K., Fox, P. T., Laird, A. R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2010). A link between the system: Functional differentiation and interaction within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5), 519-534.

20.

LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15, 155- 184.

21.

Oberman, L. M., Hubbard, E. M., McCleery, J. P., Altschuler, E. L., Ramachandran, V. S., & Pineda, J. A. (2005). EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 190- 198.

22.

Perrett, D. I., Hietanen, J. K., Oram, M. W., & Benson, P. J. (1992). Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. The Royal Society, 335, 23-30.

23.

Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?. The Behavioral and Brain Science, 4, 515-526.

24.

Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror- neuron system. Annual Review Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.

25.

Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews, 2, 661-670.

26.

Rizzolatti, R., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131-141.

27.

Sarfati, Y., Hardy-Baylè, M., Besche, C., & Widlӧcher, D. (1997). Attribution of intentions to others in people with schizophrenia: a non- verbal exploration with comic strips. Schizophrenia Research, 25, 199-209.

28.

Sugiura, M., Shah, N. J., Zilles, K., and Fink, G. R. (2005). Cortical representations of personally familiar objects and places: Functional organization of the human posterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(2), 183-198.

29.

Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Herrmann, S., Happѐ, F., Falkai, P., Maier, W., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Zilles, K. (2001). Mind reading: Neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. NeuroImage, 14, 170-181.

30.

Völlm, B. A., Taylor, A. N. W., Richardson, P., Corcoran, R., Stirling, J., Mckie, S., Deakin, J. F. W., & Elliott, R. (2006). Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. NeuroImage, 29, 90-98.

31.

Wechkin, S., Masserman, J. H., & Terris, W. (1964). Shock to a conspecific as an aversive stimulus. Psychonomic Science, 1(2), 47-48.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy