바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.26 No.1

Citation Share

Attentional effects of the sex of faces in biased sex-ratio context

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2014, v.26 no.1, pp.21-40
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2014.26.1.002


& (2014). Attentional effects of the sex of faces in biased sex-ratio context. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 26(1), 21-40, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2014.26.1.002

Abstract

Previous research suggest that sex-ratio has a huge impact on family structure, economic behavior, and more. The current study was conducted to explore the effects of sex-ratio context on human selective attention. In Experiment 1, each of the two experimental groups read two different versions of a fictitious news article: a male-biased version and a female-biased version. Then, the difference in gaze cueing effect between male and female cues was measured. Female participants in the female-biased group showed a greater gaze cueing effect to male cue stimuli than participants in any other group. That is, in a low sex ratio context (i.e., fewer males), women were more sensitive to attentional guidance from the opposite-sex gaze cue. In Experiment 2, using a letter probe task, we measured the distribution of spatial attention and also added a balanced sex-ratio group. The results showed that women assigned more amount of spatial attention to opposite-sex stimuli in a female-biased context, and less amount of spatial attention to opposite-sex stimuli in a male-biased context. The results of both experiments show that only women showed attentional effects of sex-ratio context. Female-biased context caused women to be more sensitive to attentional guidance from the opposite-sex face stimuli and assign more spatial attention to the opposite-sex face stimuli. Women in a male-biased context assigned less spatial attention to the opposite-sex face stimuli. The results are quite different from previous sex-ratio studies which state that males are more influenced by sex-ratio. This study was the first to show the attentional effects of sex-ratio, and implicates that sex-ratio influences not only socio-economic variables, but cognitive mechanisms as well.

keywords
sex-ratio, sex differences, attention, gaze cue, letter probe, 성비, 성차, 주의, 시선단서, 글자 탐사

Reference

1.

Balshine-Earn, S. (1996). Reproductive rates, operational sex ratios and mate choice in St. Peter’s fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39, 107-116.

2.

Barber, N. (2001). On the relationships between marital opportunity and teen pregnancy: The sex ratio question. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 259-267.

3.

Barber, N. (2003). The sex ratio and female marital opportunity as historical predictors of violent crime in England, Scotland, and the United States. Cross-Cultural Research, 37, 373- 392.

4.

Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 248-254.

5.

Bayliss, A. P., Pellegrino, G. D., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 631-650.

6.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.

7.

Buss, D. M., Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.

8.

Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6, 509-540.

9.

Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Simpson, J. A., Cantú, S. M., & Tybur, J. M. (2012). Sex ratio and women’s career choice: Does a scarcity of men lead women to choose briefcase over baby? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 121-134.

10.

Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149.

11.

Fossett, M. A., & Kiecolt, K. J. (2012). A methodological review of the sex ratio: Alternatives for comparative research, Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 941-957.

12.

Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694-724.

13.

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Ackerman, J. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & White, A. E. (2012). The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 69-80.

14.

Heisz, J. J., Potruff, M. M., & Shore, D. I. (2013). Females scan more than males: A potential mechanism for sex differences in recognition memory. Psychological Science, 24, 1157-1163.

15.

Hori, E., Tsunoda, M., Takeshima, M., Suzuki, M., Kurachi, M., Ono, T., & Nishijo, H. (2009). Sexual influence on gaze-guided social attention. Neurobiologia, 72(4), 9-20.

16.

Kim, M. -S., & Cave, K. R. (1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions. Psychological Science, 6, 376-380.

17.

Kim, M. -S., & Cave, K. R. (1999). Grouping effects on spatial attention in visual search. The Journal of General Psychology, 126, 326-352.

18.

Lee, T. -H., Lee, K., Lee, K. -Y., Choi, J. -S., & Kim, H. T. (2006). Korea University Facial Expression Collection: KUFEC. Lab of Behavioral Neuroscience, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

19.

Lichter, D. T., Kephart, G., McLaughlin, D. K., & Landry, D. J. (1992). Race and retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men. American Sociological Review, 57, 781-799.

20.

Pelli, D. G. (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies, Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.

21.

Posner, M. I., Snyder, R. R., & Davidseon, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(2), 160-174.

22.

Stone, E. A., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Sex ratio and mate preferences: A cross-cultural investigation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 288-296.

23.

Trivers, R. (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971, ed. B. Campbell. Aldine- Atherton.

24.

Wei, S. J., & Zhang, X. (2011). The competitive saving motive: Evidence from rising sex ratio and savings rates in China. Journal of Political Economy, 119, 511-564.

25.

Weir, L. K., Grant, J. W. A., & Hutchings, J. A. (2011). The influence of operational sex ratio on the intensity of competition for mates. American Naturalist, 177, 167-176.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy