바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.26 No.4
Citation Share

An Electrophysiological Study of Hemispheric Asymmetry in Recognizing Two Korean Scripts: The Effects of Hanja Proficiency

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2014, v.26 no.4, pp.369-383
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2014.26.4.008



& (2014). An Electrophysiological Study of Hemispheric Asymmetry in Recognizing Two Korean Scripts: The Effects of Hanja Proficiency. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 26(4), 369-383, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2014.26.4.008
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Reading the Korean Hanja (logographic) and Hangul (alphabetic) scripts invokes different underlying neural mechanisms based on the degree of grapheme-to-phoneme correspondence (GPC) in the two scripts. This study examined the distinct brain asymmetries in processing Hanja and Hangul scripts of the Korean language according to the Hanja proficiency levels of Korean native speakers. Twenty-five participants were divided into two groups according to their Hanja proficiency levels: High and low groups. Participants performed a lexical decision task (LDT) during the electroencephalogram (EEG) recording. Results revealed differential brain asymmetry patterns according to the participants’ Hanja proficiency levels. The high Hanja proficiency (HP) group showed a larger N400 lexicality effect in the right hemisphere, whereas the low Hanja proficiency (LP) group showed a larger N400 lexicality effect in the left hemisphere during Hanja script recognition. However, no distinct hemispheric asymmetry was observed according to Hanja proficiency levels when participants processed words written in Hangul script. These findings indicate that the processing of Korean Hanja script involves distinct neural processes distinguished from Hangul script processing, whereby different hemispheric specializations are involved according to the Hanja proficiency level of the reader.

keywords
철자열-음소 대응, 사건 관련 전위, N400 어휘성 효과, 시각 단어 재인, 한자 능숙도, grapheme-to-phoneme correspondence (GPC), event-related potential (ERP), N400 lexicality effect, visual word recognition, Hanja proficiency

Reference

1.

Beaton, A. A., Suller, S., & Workman, L. (2007). Visual laterality effects in readers of a deep and a shallow orthography. Laterality, 12(3), 199-215.

2.

Chiarello, C., Liu, S., & Shears, C. (2001). Does global context modulate cerebral asymmetries? A review and new evidence on word imageability effects. Brain and Language, 79(3), 360-378.

3.

Chiarello, C., Shears, C., Liu, S., & Kacinik, N. A. (2005). Influence of word class proportion on cerebral asymmetries for high-and low-imagery words. Brain and Cognition, 57(1), 35-38.

4.

Cho, J. R., & Chen, H. C. (1999). Orthographic and phonological activation in the semantic processing of Korean Hanja and Hangul. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5-6), 481-502.

5.

Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Chochon, F., Lehericy, S., & Naccache, L. (2000). Language and calculation within the parietal lobe: a combined cognitive, anatomical and fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 38(10), 1426-1440.

6.

Cousin, E., Perrone, M., & Baciu, M. (2009). Hemispheric specialization for language according to grapho-phonemic transformation and gender. A divided visual field experiment. Brain and Cognition, 69(3), 465-471.

7.

Cousin, E., Peyrin, C., & Baciu, M. (2006). Hemispheric predominance assessment of phonology and semantics: A divided visual field experiment. Brain and Cognition, 61(3), 298-304.

8.

Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of neuroscience methods, 134(1), 9-21.

9.

Frost, R., & Katz, L. (1989). Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 17(3), 302-310.

10.

Halderman, L. K., & Chiarello, C. (2005). Cerebral asymmetries in early orthographic and phonological reading processes: Evidence from backward masking. Brain and Language, 95(2), 342-352.

11.

Hanavan, K., & Coney, J. (2005). Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Japanese script. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain, and Cognition, 10(5), 413-428.

12.

Hellige, J. B. (1993). Hemispheric asymmetry: What's right and what's left. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

13.

Herwig, U., Satrapi, P., & Schönfeldt-Lecuona, C. (2003). Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain topography, 16(2), 95-99.

14.

Holcomb, P. J., Graiger, J., & O’Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysilogical study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 938-950.

15.

Jang, T. (2013). Neural correlates of hemispheric asymmetry in Korean Hangul and Hanja during visual word recognition. Unpublished master's thesis. Korea University, Seoul.

16.

Jolicœur, P., Brisson, B., & Robitaille, N. (2008). Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task. Brain research, 1215(18), 160-172.

17.

Kang, B., & Kim, H. (2009). Frequency in use of Korean. Seoul:　Hankukmunhwasa.

18.

Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1981). Linguistic coding in word recognition: Comparisons between a deep and a shallow orthography. Interactive processes in reading, 85-106.

19.

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203-205.

20.

Lecours, A. R., Lhermitte, F., & Bryans, B. (1983). Aphasiology: WB Saunders Company.

21.

Lee, O. K., & Carter, L. (1988). Recognition of Korean ideographs and phonographs in the left and right visual fields. Korean Journal of Psychology 7(2), 96-107.

22.

Nakamura, K., Oga, T., Okada, T., Sadato, N., Takayama, Y., Wydell, T., Yonekura, Y., & Fukuyama, H. (2005). Hemispheric asymmetry emerges at distinct parts of the occipitotemporal cortex for objects, logograms and phonograms: A functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 28(3), 521-528.

23.

Pavlenko, A. (2000). L2 influence on L1 in late bilingualism. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 175-205.

24.

Perre, L., Midgley, K., & Ziegler, J. C. (2009). When beef primes reef more than leaf: orthographic information affects phonological priming in spoken word recognition. Psychophysiology, 46(4), 739-746.

25.

Simon, G., Bernard, C., Lalonde, R., & Rebaï, M. (2006). Orthographic transparency and grapheme-phoneme conversion: An ERP study in Arabic and French readers. Brain research, 1104(1), 141-152.

26.

Siok, W. T., Jin, Z., Fletcher, P., & Tan, L. H. (2003). Distinct brain regions associated with syllable and phoneme. Human Brain Mapping, 18(3), 201-207.

27.

Turvey, M., Feldman, L. B., & Lukatela++, G. (1984). The Serbo-Croatian orthography constrains the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy. Status Report on Speech Research, 73, 17-26.

28.

Tzeng, O. J., Hung, D. L., Cotton, B., & Wang, W. S. (1979). Visual lateralisation effect in reading Chinese characters. Nature, 282(5738), 499-501.

29.

Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2006). Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies. Brain and Language, 97(3), 279-293.

30.

Vigário, R. N. (1997). Extraction of ocular artefacts from EEG using independent component analysis. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 103(7), 395-404.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy