바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.27 No.2
Citation Share

Chinese late L2 learners’ semantic processing in Korean: An ERP study on the local/global semantic integration during sentence comprehension

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2015, v.27 no.2, pp.183-200
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2015.27.2.006


& (2015). Chinese late L2 learners’ semantic processing in Korean: An ERP study on the local/global semantic integration during sentence comprehension. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 27(2), 183-200, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2015.27.2.006
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The present study investigated the cognitive mechanism underlying L2 semantic integration during sentence comprehension in Korean by Chinese late L2 learners. Using the violation paradigm, ERP responses of 17 intermediate level L2 learners of Korean were recorded, to local semantic incongruence between an adjective and a noun (*broken soup (vs. sweet soup)), and to global semantic incongruence between an object noun and a verb (*to repair soup (vs. to cook soup)) respectively. No ERP components reflecting the detection of semantic anomaly were observed in the local incongruence condition, whereas a biphasic N400 & P600 ERP pattern was elicited by the critical verb of the global incongruence condition. These results imply that the L2 learners investigated in the present study have largely dismissed the local integration, and concentrated rather on the global integration, which is inevitable for the grasp of the verb argument structure and hence much more important to represent the core meaning of the unfolding sentence. Based on this evidence, we argue that L2 learners might well adopt reasonable strategies for maximizing processing efficiency, although they need not be identical to those of native speakers at every stage of L2 development.

keywords
ERP, local/global semantic integration, L2 processing of Korean, Chinese late L2 learners, 사건관련전위(ERP), 국지적/전역적 의미통합, 한국어 L2 처리, 중국인 후기 학습자

Reference

1.

남윤주 (2014), 한국어 문장처리의 인지신경기제 - 문장성분의 의미통합에 관한 ERP 연구. 건국대학교 박사학위논문.

2.

남윤주 & 홍우평 (2013), 제2언어 형태-통사처리의 인지신경기제 - 한국인 학습자의 독일어 주어-동사 일치 처리에 대한 ERP 연구. 독어학 제28집, 41-68.

3.

남윤주, 정혜인 & 홍우평 (2014), 한국어 문장처리에서 부가어적 형용사와 명사의 의미통합, Linguistic Research 31(2), 381- 402.

4.

홍우평 (2011), 언어처리의 인지신경기제 - 독일어에 대한 전기생리학적 연구의 동향과 전망. 독어학, 23, 245-273.

5.

Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Beyond syntax: Language-related positivities reflect the revision of hierarchies. NeuroReport, 13, 361-364.

6.

Chwilla DJ, Brown CM, Hagoort P (1995) The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiol 32, 274-285.

7.

Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3-42.

8.

Coulson, S., King, J. W., Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(1), 21-58.

9.

Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). Right Words and Left Words: Electrophysiological Evidence for Hemispheric Differences in Meaning Processing, Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 373-392.

10.

Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). The temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late effects elicited by syntactic anomalies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1219-1248.

11.

Friederici, A., & Meyer, M. (2004). The brain knows the difference: Two types of grammatical violations. Brain Research, 1000, 72-77.

12.

Gunter, T. C., Stowe, L. A., & Mulder, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology, 34(6), 660-676.

13.

Hagoort, P. (2003). Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(6), 883-899.

14.

Hahne, A. (2001). What's different in second- language processing? Evidence from event- related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguist Reports, 30(3), 251-66.

15.

Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Processing a second language: late learners' comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123-141.

16.

Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 13(3), 339-356.

17.

Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23-49.

18.

Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 463-470.

19.

Kutas, M., Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP), Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621- 647.

20.

Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S. A. (1983). Event- related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory and Cognition, 11(5), 539-550.

21.

Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785-806.

22.

Prior, A., & Bentin, S. (2006). Differential integration efforts of mandatory and optional sentence constituents. Psychophysiology, 43(5), 440-449.

23.

Schacht, A., Sommer, W., Shmuilovich, O., Martíenz, P. C., & Martín-Loeches, M. (2014). Differential Task Effects on N400 and P600 Elicited by Semantic and Syntactic Violations. PLoS ONE, 9(3),

24.

Steinhauer, K., E. J. White, & J. E. Drury. (2009). Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: evidence from event- related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25, 13-41.

25.

Van Hell, J. G., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26(1), 43-74.

26.

Zhang, Y., Jiang, X. Ye, Z., Saalbach, H., Zhou, X. (2011), Multiple constraints on semantic integration in a hierarchical structure: ERP evidence from German. Brain Research, 1410, 89-100.

27.

Zhou, X., Jiang, X., Ye, Z., Zhang, Y., Lou, K., & Zhan, W. (2010). Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 48(6), 1551-1562.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy