바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1226-9654
  • E-ISSN2733-466X
  • KCI

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

다음
논문 투고

Vol.27 No.2

Citation Share

스트룹 과제에서 갑작스럽게 제시된 색단어의 주의 획득 효과

Effect of Abrupt Onsets Attentional Capture by the Color Word in the Stroop Task

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2015, v.27 no.2, pp.77-102
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2015.27.2.001
박영은 (Vanderbilt University)
조양석 (고려대학교)
박영은, & 조양석. (2015). 스트룹 과제에서 갑작스럽게 제시된 색단어의 주의 획득 효과. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 27(2), 77-102, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2015.27.2.001

Abstract

Although the Stroop effect has been considered to be strong evidence of automatic recognition of word, some studies showed that the Stroop effect is modulated by visual attention. In this study, we investigated the role of visual attention in the involuntary word processing of the Stroop task. Three experiments examined whether the magnitude of the Stroop effect is modulated by the color-word’s ability to capture attention in a bottom-up fashion, namely, via an abrupt onset. The Stroop effect was found to be smaller when the color-word distractor appeared as a part of a pre-existing placeholder than when it appeared abruptly in a blank location around the color-patch target (Experiment 1). Furthermore, dilution of the Stroop effect in the presence of an additional, neutral word depended on which of the two words was presented more abruptly (Experiments 2 & 3), suggesting attentional competition between them. These results imply that the color word in the Stroop task is recognized when it captures attention.

keywords
스트룹효과, 자동처리, 시각주의, 주의 획득, 갑작스런 제시, Stroop effect, automatic process, visual attention, attentional capture, abrupt onset

참고문헌

1.

Bargh, J. A. (1992). The ecology of automaticity: Toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 181-199.

2.

Brown, T. L., Gore, C. L., & Carr, T. H. (2002). Visual attention and word recognition in Stroop color word naming: Is word recognition “automatic”? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 220- 240.

3.

Brown, T. L., Roos-Gilbert, L., & Carr, T. H. (1995). Automaticity and word perception: Evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1395- 1411.

4.

Cho, Y. S., Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2006). Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 826- 839.

5.

Choi, J. M., Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: Evidence from the Stroop task combined with inhibition of return. Memory & Cognition, 37, 935-944.

6.

Cohen, J. D., Dunbar K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing model of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.

7.

Francolini, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1980). On the automaticity of “automatic” activation: Evidence of selective seeing. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 331-342.

8.

Gibson, B. S. (1996). Visual quality and attentional capture: A challenge to the special role of abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1496-1504.

9.

Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.

10.

Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356- 388.

11.

Johnston, J. C., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (1995). Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychological Science, 6, 365-369.

12.

Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.

13.

Kahneman, D., & Chajczyk, D. (1983). Test of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 497-509.

14.

Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

15.

Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Burkell, J. (1983). The cost of visual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 510-522.

16.

Kim, H., Cho, Y. S., Yamaguchi, M., & Proctor, R. W. (2008). Influence of color word availability on the Stroop color-naming effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1540- 1551.

17.

Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.

18.

Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty years after Broadbent: Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-913

19.

Logan, G. D. (1985). Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 367-386.

20.

Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.

21.

Logan, G. D. (1992). Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 317-339.

22.

Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.

23.

MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.

24.

MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 126-135.

25.

Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326.

26.

Oh, E., & Chung, C. S. (1992). Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on the Stroop tasks. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4, 105-114.

27.

Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

28.

Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control, in: R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

29.

Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing I: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.

30.

Sharma, D., & McKenna, F. P. (1998). Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1033-1040.

31.

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.

32.

Suh, J. H., & Cho, Y. S. (2013). The effect of the chance of a distractor capturing attention on distractor interference. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 25, 359-382.

33.

Todd, J. T, & Van Gelder, P. (1979). Implications of a transient-sustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 625-638.

34.

Treisman, A., Squire, R., & Green, J. (1974). Semantic processing in dichotic listening? A replication. Memory & Cognition, 2, 641-646.

35.

Virzi, R. A., & Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 13, 304-319.

36.

Yantis, S., & Johnson, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 812-825.

37.

Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621.

38.

Yee, P. L., & Hunt, E. (1991). Individual differences in Stroop dilution: Tests of the attention capture hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 715-725.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책