바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Removal of Attentional Blink and Attention Capacity Improvement through the Color-Salient Training

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2016, v.28 no.1, pp.205-212
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2016.28.1.010


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

When participants are asked to identify two targets embedded in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), they hardly identify the second target that is presented within 200-500ms after the first target. This is called an attentional blink (AB). A recent study reported that AB can be removed by the color-salient training in which the second target within 200-500ms is presented in a salient color. The study suggested that the training effect is caused by an improvement of our attentional control mechanism, which is responsible for both target selection and distractor inhibition. Alternatively, however, the training effect might be understood as a result of visual perceptual learning evoked by repetitive exposure to stimuli during the training. The current study tested these two hypotheses through an experiment that consisted of four sessions: a pre-test session, two color-salient training sessions, and a post-test session, in that order. All sessions employed number targets and alphabet letter distractors in RSVP. During the training, only half of eight numbers (from 2 to 9) were randomly selected as targets. Our results showed that even when untrained numbers, which were not used in the training, were employed as targets in the post-test, the training effects occurred, resulting in removal of AB. It supported the hypothesis that the color-salient training effect occurs not as a result of the visual perceptual learning but as a result of improvement in our attentional capacity.

keywords
attentional blink, color-salient training, attentional mechanism, visual perceptual learning, 주의 깜박임, 돋음색 훈련, 주의기제, 시지각 학습

Reference

1.

김기연 (2014). 신속순차제시에서 표적 현출성이 주의깜박거림에 미치는 영향. 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

2.

최 훈, 홍락균 (2015). 돋음색 훈련을 통한 주의 깜박임 제거 효과의 전이 가능성. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 27(1), 23-40.

3.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433-436.

4.

Braun, J. (1998). Vision and attention: the role of training. Nature, 393, 424-425.

5.

Choi, H., Chang, L. H., Shibata, K., Sasaki, Y., & Watanabe, T. (2012). Resetting capacity limitations revealed by long-lasting elimination of attentional blink through training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 12242- 12247.

6.

Choi, H., & Watanabe, T. (2014). Can attenuation of attentional blink also evoke removal of repetition blindness? Vision Research, 99, 141-147.

7.

Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two- stage model for multiple target detection in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127.

8.

Fahle, M., & Poggio, T. (2002). Perceptual learning. MIT Press.

9.

Pelli, D. G. (1997). The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437-442.

10.

Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849-860.

11.

Watanabe, T., Náñez, J. E., & Sasaki, Y. (2001). Perceptual learning without perception. Nature, 413(6858), 844-848.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology