바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.2
Citation Share

The Influence of Amodally Completed Motion on Perceived Duration

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2016, v.28 no.2, pp.271-284
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2016.28.2.004

(2016). The Influence of Amodally Completed Motion on Perceived Duration. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 28(2), 271-284, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2016.28.2.004
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

A moving object is temporarily invisible as it passes behind an occluding surface, but people perceive it as moving continuously behind the occluder, suggesting that the representation of the moving object is amodally maintained during its disappearance. The current study investigated whether the display where object invisibility is interpreted as amodal completion of a hidden object moving behind an occluder results in greater time dilation than in comparable displays that lack the interpretation of amodal completion, by manipulating the binocular disparity depth of the surface which can potentially work as an occluder in 3D displays. The result shows that the display involving amodally completed motion is perceived as longer in duration than the display where object invisibility does not entail amodal completion. This result runs counter to the prediction based on psychophysical factors previously implicated in time perception, such as overall stimulus salency, motion energy, attention and predictability. It suggests that time dilation for moving objects is mediated by higher level motion processing based on surface representation.

keywords
time perception, time dilation, tunnel effect, amodal completion, surface representation, 시간지각, 시간확장, 터널효과, 무형완성, 표면표상

Reference

1.

Anderson, B., Singh, M., & Fleming, R. (2002). The interpolation of object and surface structure. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 148-190.

2.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

3.

Brown, S. W. (1995). Time, change, and motion:The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 105-116.

4.

Brown, S. W., & Boltz, M. G. (2002). Attentional processes in time perception: Effects of mental workload and event structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception &Performance, 28, 600–615.

5.

Bruno, N., Bertamini, M., & Domini, F. (1997). Amodal completion of partly occluded surfaces: Is there evidence for a mosaic stage? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1412-1426.

6.

Burke, L. (1952). On the tunnel effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 121-138.

7.

Eagleman, D. M. (2008). Human time perception and its illusions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 131–136.

8.

Eisler, H., Eisler, A. D., & Hellström, Å. (2008). Psychophysical issues in the study of time perception. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 75-110). Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group.

9.

Fraisse, P. (1963). The psychology of time. New York: Harper & Row.

10.

Gerbino, W., & Salmaso, D. (1987). The effect of amodal completion on visual matching. Acta Psychologica, 65, 25-46.

11.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

12.

Grondin, S. (2010). Timing and time perception: a review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 561-582.

13.

He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces vs. features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.

14.

He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Perceiving textures: beyond filtering. Vision Research 34, 151-162.

15.

Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

16.

Kanai, R., Paffen, C. L. E., Hogendoorn, H., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2006). Time dilation in dynamic visual display. Journal of Vision, 6, 1421-1430.

17.

Kanai, R., & Watanabe, M. (2006). Visual onset expands subjective time. Perception &Psychophysics, 68, 1113-1123.

18.

Kaneko, S., & Murakami, I. (2009). Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-12.

19.

Kanizsa, G. (1979). Organization in vision. New York: Praeger.

20.

Kanizsa, G., & Gerbino, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception(pp. 167-190). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

21.

Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141-221.

22.

Lewis, P. A., & Miall, R. C. (2003). Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: Evidence from neuroimaging. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 250-255.

23.

Liverence, B. M., & Scholl, B. J. (2012). Discrete events as units of perceived time. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 38(3), 549.

24.

Matthews, W. J., Stewart, N., & Wearden, J. H. (2011). Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 303-313.

25.

Mauk, M. D., & Buonomano, D. V. (2004). The neural basis of temporal processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 307.340.

26.

Michotte, A., Thinés, G., & Crabbé, G. (1991). Amodal completion of perceptual structures. In G. Thinés, A. Costall, & G. Butterworth (Eds.). Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 140-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (Original work published 1964).

27.

Nakayama, K., He, Z. J., & Shimojo, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osheron (Eds.), Invitation to cognitive science (pp. 1–70). Cambridge: MIT Press.

28.

Nakayama, K., Shimojo, S., & Silverman, G. H. (1989). Stereoscopic Depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception, 18, 55-68.

29.

New, J. J., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Subjective time dilation: spatially local, object-based, or a global visual experience?. Journal of Vision, 9(2), 1-11.

30.

Palumbo, L., Ogden, R. Makin, A. D. J., & Bertamini, M. (2014). Examining visual complexity and its influence on perceived duration. Journal of Vision, 14(14), 1-18.

31.

Pariyadath, V., & Eagleman, D. (2007). The effect of predictability on subjective duration. PLoS ONE, 2, Article e1264.

32.

Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.

33.

Prinz, J. J. (2005). A neurofunctional theory of consciousness. Cognition and the brain: Philosophy and neuroscience movement, 381-96.

34.

Rammsayer, T. H. (1999). Neuropharmacological evidence for different timing mechanisms in humans. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 273-286.

35.

Sekuler, A. B., Palmer, S. E., & Flynn, C. (1994). Local and global processes in visual completion. Psychological Science, 5, 260–267.

36.

Shimojo, S., & Nakayama, K. (1990). Amodal presence of partially occluded surfaces: role of invisible stimuli in apparent motion correspondence. Perception, 19, 285-299.

37.

Singh, M. (2004). Modal and amodal completion generate different shapes. Psychological Science, 15, 454-459.

38.

Tse, P. U., Intriligator, J., Rivest, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1171–1189.

39.

Varakin D. A., Klemes, K. J., & Porter, K. A. (2013). The effect of scene structure on time perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(8), 1639-1652.

40.

Watanabe, T. (1995). Orientation and color processing for partially occluded objects. Vision Research, 5, 647-655.

41.

Wertheimer, M. (1912/1961). Experimental studies on the seeing of motion. In T. Shipley (Ed.), Classics in psychology (pp. 1032–1088). New York: Philosophical Library (Original work published 1912).

42.

Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001a). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & psychophysics, 63(8), 1293-1313.

43.

Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001b). The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception, &Psychophysics, 63(8), 1314-1329.

44.

Xuan, B., Zhang, D., He, S., & Chen, X. (2007). Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. Journal of Vision, 7, 1-5.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy