바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.2

Citation Share

Apparent motion induced by an object flashing on and off in place

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2016, v.28 no.2, pp.381-388
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2016.28.2.010



& (2016). Apparent motion induced by an object flashing on and off in place. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 28(2), 381-388, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2016.28.2.010

Abstract

The current study investigated whether the display of a repeatedly blinking object in place can give rise to a percept of apparent motion, when it is accompanied by a large occluder object. The result shows that apparent motion of an object behind the occluder can be observed when image cues for occlusion are given and the temporal interval between stimulus onsets is large enough. This result suggests that apparent motion can generate the perception of occlusion so that a physical sequence of objects coming into and going out of existence turns to be perceived as coming into and going out of sight.

keywords
가현운동, 대응문제, 무형완성, 표면표상, 운동중첩, apparent motion, correspondence problem, amodal completion, surface representation, kinetic occlusion

Reference

1.

류경주, 감기택, 정찬섭 (2004). 가현운동 경로에서 발생되는 채움의 시공간적인 특성. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 16(1), 1-21.

2.

오성주 (2011). 가현 운동 연구 패러다임의 움직임 지각 이해에 대한 기여. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 23(1), 1-44.

3.

정우현, 정찬섭 (2006). 운동 중첩에 의한 직선적 윤곽의 방위 지각. 인지과학, 17(3), 151-175.

4.

Anstis, S., & Ramachandran V. S. (1985). Kinetic occlusion by apparent movement. Perception, 14, 145-149.

5.

Blake, R., Ahlström, U., & Alais, D. (1999). Perceptual priming to invisible motion. Psychological Science, 10, 145-150.

6.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.

7.

Burke, L. (1952). On the tunnel effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 121-138.

8.

Dawson, M. R. W. (1991). The how and why of what went where in apparent motion:Modeling solutions to the motion correspondence process. Psychological Review, 98, 569-603.

9.

Ekroll, V., Faul, F., & Golz, J. (2008). Classification of apparent motion percepts based on temporal factors. Journal of Vision, 8, 1-22.

10.

Gibson, J. J., Kaplan, G. A., Reynolds, H. N., & Wheeler, K. (1969). The change from visible to invisible: A study of optical transitions. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 113-116.

11.

Kaplan, G. A. (1969). Kinetic disruption of optical texture: The perception of depth at an edge. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 193-198.

12.

Kim, S., Feldman, J., & Singh, M. (2012). Curved apparent motion induced by amodal completion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 350-364.

13.

McBeath, M. K., & Shepard, R. N. (1989). Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation: A window technique for estimating path curvature. Perception &Psychophysics, 46, 333-337.

14.

Michotte, A., Thinés, G., & Crabbé, G. (1964/1991). Amodal completion of perceptual structures. In G. Thinés, A. Costall, & G. Butterworth (Eds.). Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 140-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (Original work published 1964).

15.

Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.

16.

Ramachandran, V. S., Inada, V, & Kiama, G. (1986). Perception of illusory occlusion in apparent motion. Vision Research, 26, 1741-1749.

17.

Scholl, B. J., & Flombaum, J. I. (2010). Object persistence. In B. Goldstein (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Perception , Volume 2 (pp. 653-657). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

18.

Scholl, B. J., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259-290.

19.

Shiffrar, M., & Freyd, J. (1990). Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science, 1, 257-264.

20.

Shimojo, S., & Nakayama, K. (1990). Amodal presence of partially occluded surfaces: role of invisible stimuli in apparent motion correspondence. Perception, 19, 285-299.

21.

Tse, P., Cavanagh, P., & Nakayama, K. (1998). The role of parsing in high-level motion processing. In T. Watanabe (Ed.), High-level Motion Processing (pp. 249-266). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

22.

Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

23.

Wertheimer, M. (1912/1961). Experimental studies on the seeing of motion. In T. Shipley (Ed.), Classics in psychology (pp. 1032-1088). New York: Philosophical Library (Original work published 1912).

24.

Yantis, S. (1995). Perceived continuity of occluded visual objects. Psychological Science, 6, 182-186.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy