바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.28 No.3
Citation Share

의미 및 철자 정보와 구분되는 한국어 고유 접두사의 형태소 ERP 지표

ERP indices of Korean derivational prefix morphemes separated from the semantic and orthographic information

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2016, v.28 no.3, pp.409-430
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2016.28.3.002
강진원 (고려대학교)
남수린 (고려대학교)
임희석 (고려대학교)
남기춘 (고려대학교)
강진원, 남수린, 임희석, & 남기춘. (2016). 의미 및 철자 정보와 구분되는 한국어 고유 접두사의 형태소 ERP 지표. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 28(3), 409-430, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2016.28.3.002
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

Morphemes are combinations of meanings, grammatical information, and linguistic forms like orthographic and phonological components. This study aims to verify the priming pattern index of morpheme-specific independent Event-related potentials(ERPs), which differ from semantic and orthographic components. We conducted a priming lexical decision study comparing a morphologically related(e.g. 날계란-날고기), semantically related(e.g. 번데기-애벌레), orthographically related(e.g. 통신기-통나무) and unrelated control condition(e. g. 광역시-개죽음) with 57ms SOA(Stimulus Onset Asynchrony). The behavioral data showed the facilitatory priming effect only in the morphologically related condition, but not in the semantically and orthographically related conditions. In comparison with the unrelated condition, N250, N400, and P600 components were indicated significant in the ERP data. For the N250 ERP component, all three related primes produced a significantly less negative amplitude compared to the ones from unrelated primes. Moreover, the morphologically related primes caused the least negativity. For the N400 ERP component, the morphologically related condition had shown similar aspects as the semantically related condition. However, the morphologically related condition showed only meaningful amplitude difference clearly compared to the unrelated condition. In the case of the P600 ERP component, the morphologically related condition presented a contrast to semantically, orthographically, and unrelated conditions. Overall, it appeared that there had been three information processing steps in the morphological processing. This result implicates that the semantic and orthographic components of the morphemes occur in the early processes, including N250 and N400, and the other components, such as derivational and other grammatical information; these are reflected in the late process of P600.

keywords
cmorphological processing, derived noun, Korean prefixed word, ERPs, 형태소 처리, 파생 명사, 한국어 고유 접두어, 사건관련전위

참고문헌

1.

Barber, H., Domınguez, A., & de Vega, M. (2002). Human brain potentials indicate morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 318(3), 149-152.

2.

Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs. Neuroreport, 15(3), 545-548.

3.

Beyersmann, E., Iakimova, G., Ziegler, J. C., & Colé, P. (2014). Semantic processing during morphological priming: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1579, 45-55.

4.

Chauncey, K., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2008). Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An event-related potentials (ERP) investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 183-200.

5.

Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unraveling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influence in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 75-114.

6.

Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory and Cognition, 36(6), 895-908.

7.

Dominguez, A., de Vega, M., & Barber, H. (2004). Event-related brain potentials elicited by morphological, homographic, orthographic, and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 598-608.

8.

Feldman, L. B., Soltano, E. G., Pastizzo, M. J., & Francis, S. E. (2004). What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing?. Brain and Language, 90(1), 17-30.

9.

Friederici, A. D., & Weissenborn, J. (2007). Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax-semantic interface. Brain Research, 1146, 50-58.

10.

Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, & morphological factors. Memory and Cognition, 28(8), 1277-1288.

11.

Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What we can learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23(4), 829-856.

12.

Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4-5), 421-444.

13.

Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(1), 127-131.

14.

Gold, B. T., & Rastle, K. (2007). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(12), 1983-1993.

15.

Gouvea, A. C., Phillips, C., Kanzanina, N., & Poeppel, D. (2010). The linguistic processes underlying the P600. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 149-188.

16.

Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). An ERP investigation of orthographic priming with relative-position and absolute-position primes. Brain Research, 1270, 45-53.

17.

Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysology, 55(4), 468-484.

18.

Havas, V., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., & Clahsen, H. (2012). Brain potentials for derivational morphology: an ERP study of deadjectival nominalizations in Spanish. Brain and Language, 120(3), 332-344.

19.

Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2006). On the time course of visual word recognition: An event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1631-1643.

20.

Hutzler, F., Bergmann, J., Conrad, M., Kronbichler, M., Stenneken, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllablefrequency in lexical decision: An event related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 372(3), 179-184.

21.

Jung, J., Lee, H., Moon, Y., Kim, D., Pyun, S., & Nam, K. (1999). Hemispheric asymmetry in processing semantic relationship shown in normals and aphasic. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Human and Cognitive Language Technology, 359-367.

22.

Kang, B., & Kim, H. (2009). Use frequency of Korean. Seoul: Hankook Munhwasa.

23.

Kielar, A., & Joanisse, M. F. (2011). The role of semantic and phonological factors in word recognition: An ERP cross-modal priming study of derivational morphology. Neuropsychologia, 49(2), 161-177.

24.

Kolk, H. H., Chwilla, D. J., van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 85(1), 1-36.

25.

Kwon, Y., Lee, Y., & Nam, K. (2011). The different P200 effects of phonological and orthographic syllable frequency in visual word recognition in Korean. Neuroscience letters, 501(2), 117-121.

26.

Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 866-877.

27.

Lee, J., Choi, J., Yoo, J., Kim, M., Lee, S., Kim, J., & Jeong, B. (2014). The effect of word imagery on priming effect under a preconscious condition: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 35(9), 4795-4804.

28.

Lee, Y. (2002). Dictionary of derivative nouns in Korean. Seoul: Kookhak Jaryowon.

29.

Leinonen, A., Brattico, P., Järvenpää, M., & Krause, C. M. (2008). Event-related potential(ERP) responses to violations of inflectional and derivational rules of Finnish. Brain Research, 1218, 181-193.

30.

Longtin, C. M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 26-41.

31.

Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Bozic M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 394-421.

32.

Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3.

33.

McKinnon, R., Allen, M., & Osterhout, L. (2003). Morphological decomposition involving nonproductive morphemes: ERP evidence. Neuroreport, 14(6), 883-886.

34.

Morris, Frank, Grainger, & Holcomb (2007). Semantic Transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 44(4), 506-521.

35.

Morris, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2008). An electrophysiological investigation of early effects of masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7-8), 1021-1056.

36.

Münte, T. F., Heinze, H. J., Matzke, M., Wieringa, B. M., & Johannes, S. (1998). Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: No evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia, 36(3), 217-226.

37.

Nam, S., Baik, Y., Lim, H., & Nam, K. (2014). Different time courses of orthographic, morphological, and semantic activation during Korean prefixed derivational word recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 26(1), 1-20.

38.

Newman, A. J., Ulman, M. T., Pancheva, R., Waligura, D. L., & Neville, H. J. (2007). An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection. NeuroImage, 34(1), 435-445.

39.

Palmović, M., & Maričić, A. (2008). Mental lexicon and derivational rules. Collegium Antropologicum, 32(1), 177-181.

40.

Petit, J. P., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2006). On the time course of letter perception: A masked priming ERP investigation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(4), 674-681.

41.

Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445-486.

42.

Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4-5), 507-537.

43.

Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morphoorthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(6), 1090-1098.

44.

Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2008). Association and not semantic relationships elicit the N400 effect: Electrophysiological evidence from an explicit language comprehension task. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 50-59.

45.

Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 353-361.

46.

Shelton, J. R., & Martin, R. C. (1992). How semantic is automatic semantic priming?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(6), 1191.

47.

Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 638-647.

48.

Yi, K., & Bae, S. (2009). Effects of orthographic and morphological frequency of a syllable in Korean word recognition. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(3), 309-333.

49.

Yi, K., Jung, J., & Bae, S. (2007). Writing system and visual word recognition:Morphological representation and processing in Korean. The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19(4), 313-327.

50.

Yi, K., & Yi, I. (1999). Morphological processing in Korean word recognition. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11(1), 77-91.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책