ISSN : 1226-9654
Motion repulsion is a visual illusion in which perception of moving dots is shifted away from its actual direction with the presence of another field of dots moving in a different direction. Kang et al. (2011) have demonstrated that the motion repulsion also occurs for the perceived field of dots when subjects hold another field of moving dots in working memory. Here, it was tested whether the perceptual shift induced by working memory is resistant to the demand characteristics, subjects’ tendency of conforming to the expected hypothesis of the experimenter. Subjects were tested over two separate days. On the first day of participation, they were presented with a sequence of two random-dot motion displays and performed a perceptual judgment task for the second motion display while holding the first display in their working memory. On the second day of participation, the same experiment was run; but the subjects were informed that their performance was inaccurate (inaccuracy instruction group) or judgments were shifted away from the direction of the other motion stimulus (repulsion instruction group). Despite these instructions, perceptual repulsion was robustly reproduced. This result indicates that our visual working memory representation robustly alters perception, providing converging evidence for a close relation between working memory and perception.
Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321(5890), 851-854.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433-436.
Edin, F., Klingberg, T., Johansson, P., McNab, F., Tegnér, J., & Compte, A. (2009). Mechanism for top-down control of working memory capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16), 6802-6807.
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. (2014). “Top-down”effects were none should be found: The El Greco fallacy in perception research. Psychological Science, 25(1), 38-46.
Harrison, S. A., & Tong, F. (2009). Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas. Nature, 458(7238), 632-635.
Huang, J., & Sekuler, R. (2010). Attention protects the fidelity of visual memory:behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(40), 13461-13471.
Kang, M.-S., Hong, S. W., Blake, R., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Visual working memory contaminates perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 860-869.
Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2011). Mental imagery and visual working memory. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e29221.
Marshak, W., & Sekuler, R. (1979). Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. Science, 205(4413), 1399-1401.
McDermott, K., & Roediger, H. (1998). Attempting to avoid illusory memories: Robust false recognition of associates persists under conditions of explicit warnings and immediate testing. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 508-520.
Mendoza, D., Schneiderman, M., Kaul, C., & Martinez-Trujillo, J. (2011). Combined effects of feature-based working memory and feature-based attention on the perception of visual motion direction. Journal of Vision, 11(1), 1-15.
Olkkonen, M., & Allred, S. R. (2014). Short-term memory affects color perception in context. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e86488.
Orne, M. (1979). Social psychology of the psychological experiment - with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American psychologist, 17(11), 776-783.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437-442.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(3), 341-65.
Roediger, H., & McDermott, K. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not present in the lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
Scocchia, L., Valsecchi, M., Gegenfurtner, K. R., & Triesch, J. (2014). Differential effects of visual attention and working memory on binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 14(5), 1-15.
Serences, J. T., Ester, E. F., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2009). Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychological Science, 20(2), 207-214.
Shiffrin, R., & Atkinson, R. (1969). Storage and retrieval processes in long-term memory. Psychological Review, 76(2), 179-193.
Soto, D., Hodsoll, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 342-348.
Supèr, H., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. (2001). A neural correlate of working memory in the monkey primary visual cortex. Science, 293(5527), 120-124.
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438(7067), 500-503.
Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8), 1293-1313.
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(2), 363-377.
Zhang, W., & Luck, S. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453(7192), 233-235.